Emma Swan Character Analysis
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
hjbau wrote:I still don't think that Rumpel can see the future. If he made the curse then he caused it to happen and gave it to Regina and helped her to enact it. He collected ingredients and told her about using the heart of the one you love most. Rumpel caused the curse to happen so there is no reason for him to have seen the future. It is sort of like if i tell you that i am going to hit you and then hit you i didn't see the future i just made my statement come true.
Sorry but thats not the same thing - he didnt have SW & PC bring Emma into town on her 28birthday did he, he left that up to fate/his vision/feeling of the future ie. he said it would happen & it did. Robert stated Rumps/Gold 'woke up' when he heard the name "Emma", which indicates he didnt 'know' about FTL before that moment- why have anyone send the savior off, if you didnt know for Certain they'd be back & knew you couldnt influence their coming back???, Also I picked up Rumps calling out "I want her name" changing to I "NEED" her name just the once! if he didnt really know what was going to happen why would he NEED her name?-Personally I think we'll see in the next few eps that Gold isnt as happy as expected in town & so why would he want to stay there & never have a happy ending? He knows more than we currently think he does, its just which cards is he going to play next & how do they fall for Emma, SW/PC, EQ & Henry.
-

Surayya - Posts: 722
- Joined: April 4, 2012, 3:48 am
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
When it really comes down to it i think that it is Rumpel who is causing what he wants to happen to happen and i think their are more forces causing what is happen then just Rumpel. There is more to it then that.
-

hjbau - Posts: 2402
- Joined: February 7, 2012, 8:01 pm
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
Your example was made with if person 1 says they are going to hit person 2, then does thats not looking into the future - correct its not BUT if person one says to person 2 that person 3 (who hasnt meet either persons 1 or 2 & has no knowledge of their conversation) will smack them both in 2 days & it happens THAT is different & it is what Rumps did as he had no control over Emma's actions - in fact no one did & the fact Emma was protected & outside the curse means it could Not have acted on her at all- not until she entered SB at the very least anyway.
-

Surayya - Posts: 722
- Joined: April 4, 2012, 3:48 am
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
"You....you saved me!"--Snow
"Its the honorable thing to do."--Charming
-

charming - Posts: 548
- Joined: April 6, 2012, 7:56 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
-

hjbau - Posts: 2402
- Joined: February 7, 2012, 8:01 pm
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
hjbau wrote:What other purpose would Rumpel have for bottling Snow and Charming's love other then something to do with the curse? You are right we don't really know, but there has to be a reason, so what?
This is one of the tv situations. A character is not dea until you see a body. We never saw Kathryn's body and forums blow up about this and that her being dead, I hope they don't kill her blah blah blah. This is no different. Rumple is such that unless he says it we can't tell what he does is for that purpose. Any character in this story. Unless they say it or another character said so it may or may not be true. Imaginations are great to have because I want to grow wings and fly around all day but I will never grow wings. I may learn to fly a plane one day.
"You....you saved me!"--Snow
"Its the honorable thing to do."--Charming
-

charming - Posts: 548
- Joined: April 6, 2012, 7:56 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
-

hjbau - Posts: 2402
- Joined: February 7, 2012, 8:01 pm
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
hjbau wrote:I am not disagreeing that we don't know for certain that Rumpel bottled the love for the curse, but give us another reason? What purpose? The idea that it is for the curse fits the plot of the show. I would love to hear another reason.
I don't profess to know. Yes it does fit. No denial there or anywhere. It even makes sense too. The mere fact that no character made mention of it means to me that all of our theories can hold true and it can all be thrown out of the window because the reason he has the bottles are of a purpose none of us thought of. That's all. We can't predict death without a body and the things the character does is not so until confirmed by 2 characters one of which is themself.
That said Bae being August fit as does, Pinnochio, White Knight and maybe he's one of them or none of them. Just saying because the clues fit the conclusion but because there is no trail leading there you cannot say it is so until that trail is clear. All roads lead to Rome but but first you need to be on the road and heading in that direction.
"You....you saved me!"--Snow
"Its the honorable thing to do."--Charming
-

charming - Posts: 548
- Joined: April 6, 2012, 7:56 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
Me. I never saw King George die so surprised more like a whoa. Kath, I knew she was not dead but was expecting her to walk in the courtroom at MM's trial and say, "can I say something for the defense?" King Midas in SB. No. We do not know his fate nor did we on the two priors. There was no hard core evidence proving of their deaths. There was clear evidence of them being absent. Being absent does not make you dead in the tv world. That theory hold true for the bottles. We know the shoe fits but first you need the foot and then the shoe.
"You....you saved me!"--Snow
"Its the honorable thing to do."--Charming
-

charming - Posts: 548
- Joined: April 6, 2012, 7:56 pm
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Emma Swan Character Analysis
-

hjbau - Posts: 2402
- Joined: February 7, 2012, 8:01 pm
Return to Character discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest