Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

  

Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

Postby weedith » April 30, 2012, 7:01 am

We saw August adding to the book, which Henry noticed in last night's episode. But why was his story left out in the first place? If Rumplestiltskin wrote the book, as some have theorized, surely he would have known Pinocchio's story. Why would he leave it out? If it was just a regular book of fairy tales, it would have been in there because it is a popular story. I get why the modern part of the story (Pinocchio and Emma arriving in the real world) wouldn't be in there, but the original part should have been. Did they explain this last night and I just missed it?
Keeper of Rumplestiltskin's spinning wheel, Regina's lipstick, Mary Margaret's apartment, Mr. Gold's accent & Archie's session with Mr. Gold.
User avatar
weedith
 
Posts: 174
Joined: February 27, 2012, 9:37 pm

Re: Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

Postby hjbau » April 30, 2012, 7:08 am

The original part was there i think. In Ep 5 Henry knew that Geppetto and Jiminy were best friends so part of their story had to have been in the book. It may have just been that the part after wasn't all the way finished like they showed Pinocchio go in the wardrobe now, but not what happened afterwards.
User avatar
hjbau
 
Posts: 2402
Joined: February 7, 2012, 8:01 pm

Re: Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

Postby DanaNich » April 30, 2012, 10:52 am

I had assumed that the book was some sort of chronicle of the curse, and who had been affected by it. If Pinocchio wasn't there when the curse happened he may not have been in the book. This would be especially true if Snow White and company had some hand in creating the book, since they had no idea that Pinocchio went through the wardrobe.
DanaNich
 
Posts: 2
Joined: April 30, 2012, 10:47 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

Postby belleoftheball » April 30, 2012, 11:01 am

Hmm, I hadn't thought about this. We know that Pinnoc was at least mentioned in the book because we saw him in the pilot with Gepetto. So whoever wrote the book knew that he at least existed in FTL. As to why his story wasn't included, it could be no one knew it. Other than the Blue Fairy and Jiminy, how many people knew that Gepetto had a puppet that was turned into a real boy? Or, perhaps the story wasn't included because at the time of writing the book, someone thought the story wouldn't be important to Emma knowing about the curse (assuming they knew nothing about Pinnoc going through the wardrobe as well).
User avatar
belleoftheball
 
Posts: 46
Joined: March 17, 2012, 3:24 pm

Re: Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

Postby darcyfarrow » April 30, 2012, 6:11 pm

In an early episode, Henry tore some pages out of the end of the book to keep Regina from seeing the. Emma threw those pages into a fire. Maybe Pinoccio's story was in those pages.
"I chose it once. Now I choose you."
User avatar
darcyfarrow
 
Posts: 424
Joined: March 4, 2012, 1:42 pm

Re: Why wasn't Pinocchio in the book?

Postby hjbau » April 30, 2012, 7:01 pm

Pinocchio's story was in the book. Henry said that it was a new story about Pinocchio after the story we know. That was my understanding of what he said. The new story was about Pinocchio being put in the wardrobe and the end of that story wasn't finished.
User avatar
hjbau
 
Posts: 2402
Joined: February 7, 2012, 8:01 pm


Return to 1x20 "The Stranger"

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests