The main thing Jane Esperson said that is driving me up the wall with wonder is:
There’s more than one way to [give a] clue.
What does that mean? Are we supposed to disregard the obvious and look for the extremely subtle?
Translation: “Anything could be a clue, the obvious stuff and all the other stuff you’re totally overlooking too. And stuff you think means one thing, could actually mean the opposite. Or stuff could actually mean what it obviously looks like and we’re just making you think that’s too obvious, so it can’t be true….but maybe it still is. Basically, y’all have no hope and are completely at the writers’ mercy. BWAHAHAHAHAA” 😛