[adrotate group="5"]
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast
Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show
Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Character discussion › Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire › Reply To: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire
I was going to write in another thread, but decided not, so i will write here.
Is about AU finale promo.
Some of people say that is a AU bc the writer doesnt change the past , so is not real, i wonder if they saw that they are contradicting themselves here, if the writer can make Rumple born 300 years later, because is a AU, there not real, the writer for sure could have give Belle and Rumple a son called Baelfire( bringing Dylan), so yeah, that whole explanation Bae could not have existed bc the writer cant change past and bring back death doesnt fit here because like they say said it is AU , that is exactly why Bae could exist in this , bc is Au, so not really changing the past, or bringing back the dead. He simply is not there, bc they dont want it( which will cost them major problems with the fandom and GA, that im already seing people mad by bae being erased and there are 2 hours if they see that they dont like the 1st hour they wont go for the second one) and also bc probably Henry would ask for his help( and we cant have that, Henry can bond with his father even if is the young version, he should just bond with hook bc he such a great parental role model). Also, most likely Emma wont be daughter of Snow, they have the same age, there is no curse to stop the time, so not related, again bc is AU, there not real, so there they can do what ever they want, since wont stick in the end.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".