- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Nevertheless, a big-time love hangover is bearing down on a veteran network drama series — and its arrival may produce aftershocks that extend to each and every player in the tangled web of relationships around which it revolves.
We’ve learned that while the health of the couple at the center of the maelstrom probably won’t hinge on this visit from the Ghost of Story Arcs Past, there will almost certainly be carnage once the truth comes out within the series’ next few installments.
More: http://tvline.com/2015/12/07/blind-item-drama-series-love-story-old-plot/
[adrotate group="5"]"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Most likely not OUAT, but with actual Ghosts of the Past coming to the show, I thought it might be good to keep an eye on it.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"I read this, and I think it applies to Once. It has to do with Milah.
1. Could cause trouble for both Rumbelle and Captain Swan, with the return of Milah.
2. TECHNICALLY, if they bring back a young Baelfire, then that still counts as a former “series regular.”
3. We’ll see Hook conflict with his feelings for both Emma and Milah, since those were reawakened with his darkness.
Keeper of Thor’s Hammer, Will Scarlet’s Genie Bottle, Emma’s Gun, Emma and Henry’s Moment at the Castle, Cora, and the infamous Family Tree!
A bit late, but I found out that this particular blind item was already revealed, and it didn’t have to do with OUAT. Just in the event that anyone was still theorizing about this:
Happy holidays, Good Wife fans! Hope you can hold out ’til Season 7 resumes on Jan. 10, 2016! (Oh, and yes, this was the answer to TVLine’s most recent Blind Item!)
http://tvline.com/2015/12/13/the-good-wife-recap-alicia-will-voicemail-deleted-eli-season-7/
Good to know that one item is over and done with. Means that Milah’s appearance (and the ever possible Neal appearance) is brief and perfunctory; nothing to cause angst to either CS or Rumbelle.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Good to know that one item is over and done with. Means that Milah’s appearance (and the ever possible Neal appearance) is brief and perfunctory; nothing to cause angst to either CS or Rumbelle.
I mean, Milah’s probably only appearing in 514, and that will be it for her involvement this Season. Emma and Milah’s meeting may play out as more so comedic, than actually causing long-term drama.
Emma and Milah’s meeting may play out as more so comedic, than actually causing long-term drama.
This is basically what I’m expecting:
Emma approaches Rumple and Milah having a heated conversation
Rumple (awkwardly): “This is Milah. My ex-wife.”
Emma (understanding washing over her): “Milah. That’s the name Killian has on his wrist.”
Milah: “Killian? Killian Jones? You know him?”
Emma: “I’m here to save him. I love him.”
Milah: “I loved him too. We were together for many years.”
Rumple: “She’s also Baelfire’s mother”
Emma (taken aback): “Hook’s first love is Neal’s mother?”
Rumple: “What’s a few lovers between family?” (or something equally sarcastic)
Scene Change. We never see Milah again.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
The topic ‘TVLine Dec 7: Another Potential Blind Item’ is closed to new replies.