Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › General discussion and theories › The problem with OUAT
- This topic has 19 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by Rainbow.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 18, 2016 at 7:51 am #332224PriceofMagicParticipant
This is probably going to sound crazy considering it’s a show about fairy tales, but I think the main issue with OUAT is its lack of realism. Season 1 is widely considered the best season but also you had the “normal” side of things when everyone was still cursed in Storybrooke eg with Snowing, you had the fairy tale “I will always find you” side of things but in Storybrooke with MM and David, you had the fallout of an ill advised affair. With Regina, you had the EQ side of things, but then you also had mayor Mills and her paranoia over the arrival of her adopted son’s birth mother. The paranoia wasn’t just over the curse being broken but also that Emma was going to take Henry away. There were real issues mixed in with the fantastical. As the seasons have worn on, the plot has gotten more outlandish and more unbelievable and the characters no longer feel like real people.
The other main issue with OUAT is that the characters are no longer important to the story. There is tons of potential for story that is based around the characters eg Rumple and his addiction to magic storyline. Addiction is a real world problem, and whilst Rumple’s addiction may be to magic rather than alcohol or drugs, there’s no reason why that shouldn’t be explored in a real way. It even provides story for Belle. As the wife of an addict, how does she cope with the addiction issue, what does she do to try and help Rumple? There is so much that could be explored with RumBelle that doesn’t involve a constant fight/make up/leave/ comeback every single season. Belle leaving Rumple because of his addiction shouldn’t be an automatic first response but a last resort when every other avenue has failed. Belle leaving should make Rumple realise he’s hit rock bottom and make him strive to get his life back on track and regain what he has lost including his marriage to Belle. He’s going to have slip ups along the way, particularly if he’s trying to give up magic but he’s required to use magic for whatever reason. As it is Belle leaves every time she and Rumple have an argument and thus her leaving actually loses any meaning because she does it so often.
With CS, a very divisive pairing, if that’s the way the writers wanted to go then they needed to own it and actually explore Emma and Hook getting from point A to point B and SHOW that progression rather than basically going “they’re together now, deal with it”. SF was always going to be a sticking point, and to say that the CS vs SF debate got nasty would be an understatement, but rather than running away from the issue and killing Neal off, the writers should’ve explored that, confronted the problem and overcome it.
If Neal had been kept alive, they could’ve shown Henry still wanting his parents to be together and disliking Hook because he believes he is standing in the way of that goal. They could’ve shown Neal and Emma working together to co-parent Henry despite not being in a romantic relationship with each other, a positive message to kids whose parents might be getting a divorce or who don’t live together. That could show that Emma and Neal, despite being in romantic relationships with other people, are still Henry’s parents and aren’t just going to ignore him for their new romantic partner.
If Neal had to die, they should’ve explored the ramifications of his death, not just ignore it which is the biggest mistake the show ever made. Rumple’s addiction storyline would take a turn for the worse as he is trying to deal with the loss of his son, Henry would hate Hook even more because he would feel that liking Hook is a betrayal of Neal (even though its not), or have Henry feel guilty for liking Hook because of the same reason. Have Hook actually make an effort for Henry’s sake rather than as a means to get to Emma.
The writers could’ve made CS an accepted ship within the fandom as a whole if they’d just put the effort in. It might not be the preferred ship of some, but it would’ve been accepted in a “CS is alright but I prefer SF” kind of way. As it currently stands, there is absolutely no reason why Emma would’ve been in a relationship with Hook before season 6 because his behaviour was not very becoming. Season 6 has actually portrayed Hook in a more genuinely positive light (feeling guilt for past bad actions and trying to make amends) and this sort of behaviour is what he should’ve been displaying before CS became a thing. The writers got lazy and it shows in terms of character actions and the storylines as a whole.
[adrotate group="5"]All magic comes with a price!
Keeper of FelixDecember 18, 2016 at 8:06 am #332225Bar FarerParticipantI might elaborate later when I have time, but it all comes down to the writers becoming lazy since 3B. If the want to do something they do it even if it doesn’t make sense. If something complicates things, they ignore it etc…
"All your questions are pointless"
December 18, 2016 at 4:29 pm #332229hjbauParticipantThe characters no longer feel like real people. That is the problem with the show in a sentence. People do not behave the way the characters on this show behave. At the beginning of Season 2 Snow would die and kill for Emma, then in the last episode she is willing to risk Emma and everyone in the town to save Regina. Hook behaved like a misogynistic, sexist, pig in Season 2 and then he is randomly kissing and then dating Emma later on in the season. Emma spends her entire life wanting to find her parents and to have family and then once she does she spends no time getting to know them and is fine moving out without even a discussion. Regina was a abusive psycho mother in Season 1 and 2 then randomly she is accepted as part of the family by the family she has been trying to murder for years and years.
People don’t act like that. Sure people can be erratic and don’t always say the right thing, but the characters on this show come across as insane and stupid because they are so inconsistent. They waffle back and forth from one episode to the next. They are completely rewritten between seasons as if the writers forgot everything that the characters did in the season before. It just makes no sense.
I don’t think that there is any way that Hook can date Emma and it make sense. The only way is if Hook was from the beginning written as a completely different character then he was. He could not be the horrible, gross, misogynistic character that he was written as in Season 2 and date Emma. There is also no way that Neal could be alive and he and Emma not be together, not as the show was written since the beginning. Emma’s anger at Neal in Season 1, the way she talked about him back then, what happened with Bae and Rumpel, Emma and Neal falling in love in Tallahassee, them meeting again in Manhattan. If Neal was alive as he was written in the show, then he and Emma would be together.
The only way to change those two things and the show still be coherent and good and would be to completely rewrite those two characters from the beginning. That is why they killed off Neal. It just doesn’t work. A writer can’t make one plan and then change their mind mid show and then have the narrative make sense. The narrative of this show does not make sense and it never will because, as written, Emma would never date Hook.
December 18, 2016 at 6:54 pm #332230RumplesGirlKeymasterI agree that realism is a problem but I think the biggest is lack of coherent world building. Nothing plot wise nor character wise matters because the writers can change on a dime whenever they see fit, either for a better idea or because they simply don’t care to keep things consistent. This fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants world building doesn’t work because not only does magic not make sense (or just any random plot device) but it also means big concepts like what good or evil actually *is* are so ill defined that it’s hard (if not impossible) to tell a story.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"December 18, 2016 at 7:44 pm #332233AKAParticipantNothing plot wise nor character wise matters because the writers can change on a dime whenever they see fit, either for a better idea or because they simply don’t care to keep things consistent. This fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants world building doesn’t work because not only does magic not make sense (or just any random plot device) but it also means big concepts like what good or evil actually *is* are so ill defined that it’s hard (if not impossible) to tell a story.
Agree completely. I mean what happened to “dead means dead” or “all magic comes with a price” or “evil is not born it is made” they have completely disregarded all of these in the last three seasons, and that does not even include all the magical portals that have suddenly appeared. Another problem that I feel is central is a lack of creative writing when we have new worlds. I was so incredibly excited to see the inside of Jefferson’s hat, Camelot, OZ, and even the land of untold stories. They start these worlds, get us excited, and then loose focus completely. They never completely develop them and therefore we are left unsatisfied. I know we need to focus on our key players but we have seen them be able to connect characters and stories to our main characters in an effective way. I mean look at this season with the land of untold stories Hyde was connected to Rumple, Nemo was connected to Hook, and Cinderella’s sister of course was connected to her. I liked these episodes because they took the world that they were developing and connected them to our current main characters. Unfortunately that was it, the land of untold stories consisted of only three stories, that is sad. They could have done so much more with this as well as the other worlds that I am left with a “well that was okay” feeling. Instead we get rewritten story lines over and over again and characters that are completely out of character so that they can “move the plot along”
December 19, 2016 at 3:25 am #332235Bar FarerParticipantWhen I try to think when the problems of OUAT began, I think abput two options: the second half of season 2 (“2B”) and season 3B.
In season 2B, they decided to kill Cora early in order to get into the Peter Pan storyline, which made the end of season 2 feel anticlimactic in comparison to season 1. However, I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt because their main focus was still the characters, we got to see Emma dealing with her ex, someone she loved very much, her kid’s father and their relationship, their past and learning that he is connected to Storybrooke and her fate as the savior; we got to see Rumple dealing with finally finding his son, the fact that his son didn’t want anything to do with him; we got to see Snow trying to deal with the murder she committed; we got to see Regina dealing with her inner darkness (when it wasn’t so repetitive).
My major issue was with 220, if you want to make Regina sympathetic, it is best not to show her ordering the massacre of an entire village (something that later becomes a major problem because the writers THINK the audience doesn’t care about the smallfolks, thus the writers don’t care about them, translated into the characters not caring about them so why exactly are they considered heroes? Because they care about Hook?).
Then came season 3A and I was willing to forgive them about the problems of season 2B. I see that this season is not among the favorable seasons and it’s a shame, it really is underated. What is so great about 3A is that it had a strong theme of family and parenthood that held the plot and characters really tight, we saw it in Emma and Snow’s conversations and how Emma feels that she’s a lost girl, we saw it in Emma’s drive to save her son (“I choose Henry”), we saw it in Regina in “Save Henry” (“All I have is him”), we saw it in Neal and Henry, and the parallels to Rumple and Baelfire and of course Pan and Rumple. This season was great on its own and in how it connects to the overall thems of the entire series (1-3A) which ultimately gave the most satisfying and the best conclusion of all the seasons.
Then came 3B and it went downhill ever since. My biggest problem is the way they handled Neal. In the beginning of the season we had Regina teasing Emma about Hook being her “boyfriend” and Snow said “she just lost Neal”, Emma’s reaction was “how can you be so insensitive after I lost someone I love and care about”, but when Neal actually died, approximately 3-4 days after according to the shows timeline she got together with Hook, how is this consistent in anyway?! You want them to be together? Fine, but do it organically, otherwise ot doesn’t make sense. Keep them apart long enough for Emma to grieve and for Hook to make amends with the people he hurt like Archie and Belle, and perhaps even Rumple. But that’s not the only thing, it seemed like they didn’t want to pay attention to details in order for things to make sense in the larger scope of the series so we get weird stuff like Cora being betrothed to Leopold even when it didn’t make sense with 118, we get splitting heart “twist” even if it doesn’t align with what we know about magical hearts and it contradicts the dead is dead rule, we get scenes like the heroes starting shooting flying monkeys, which we learned (in the same episode) that those are innocent people who got turned into flying monkeys by Zelena, and then no reaction by them after learning that they killed innocent people (these peasants nobody cares about). But the worst thing is how they turned Emma into a huge mcguffin that never had any significant role in the arc, except her becoming Hook’s girlfriend. They never needed to cast the DC again, all they needed to do was give Regina a pep talk and then she’s good to defeat Zelena (that’s what actually happened). Emma got shoved aside in order to focus on the fan favorites Regina and Hook. By the end of season the forcibly got the characters to where they wanted them to be and now they go through a recycled character arc that gets resetted each season, they ignore past events, they ignore what the characters used to be and what motivated them like Rumple who was turned into a different character entirely, or Snow and Charming who suddenly have no reaction towards Ingrid, a woman who raised their long lost daughter for a time, which not being able to raise their child was a key element in their characterization and arc.
The showrunners gave into fanservice and their decision making is based on that, the fans want CS -kill Neal and pretend like he never existed, the fans want SQ – lots and lots of queerbaiting, the fans like Disney – Frozen and Brave fanfics with ridiculous blue hair for Hades. Robin is boring (because they didn’t make the effort to develope him properly) – Kill him off, fans are angry that Robin was killed – bring him back.
In conclusion, they don’t try to tell a compelling story with compelling characters. They try to have the series as long as they can by doing fanservice time after time in the hopes it would give them high enough ratings to get renewed. That is really the problem with OUAT.
"All your questions are pointless"
December 19, 2016 at 5:07 am #332236WickedRegalParticipantIn conclusion, they don’t try to tell a compelling story with compelling characters. They try to have the series as long as they can by doing fanservice time after time in the hopes it would give them high enough ratings to get renewed. That is really the problem with OUAT.
You hit the nail on the head with this truth!
In the struggle to keep their ratings at least halfway decent, Adam and Eddy are trying to make every corner of the OUAT Fandom happy and interested even at the cost of their show becoming even more confusing and ruined.
"If you go as far as you can see...you will then see enough to go even further." - Finn Balor
December 19, 2016 at 6:43 am #332237MattParticipantWhen I try to think when the problems of OUAT began, I think abput two options: the second half of season 2 (“2B”) and season 3B. In season 2B, they decided to kill Cora early in order to get into the Peter Pan storyline, which made the end of season 2 feel anticlimactic in comparison to season 1. However, I was willing to give them the benefit of the doubt because their main focus was still the characters, we got to see Emma dealing with her ex, someone she loved very much, her kid’s father and their relationship, their past and learning that he is connected to Storybrooke and her fate as the savior; we got to see Rumple dealing with finally finding his son, the fact that his son didn’t want anything to do with him; we got to see Snow trying to deal with the murder she committed; we got to see Regina dealing with her inner darkness (when it wasn’t so repetitive). My major issue was with 220, if you want to make Regina sympathetic, it is best not to show her ordering the massacre of an entire village (something that later becomes a major problem because the writers THINK the audience doesn’t care about the smallfolks, thus the writers don’t care about them, translated into the characters not caring about them so why exactly are they considered heroes? Because they care about Hook?). Then came season 3A and I was willing to forgive them about the problems of season 2B. I see that this season is not among the favorable seasons and it’s a shame, it really is underated. What is so great about 3A is that it had a strong theme of family and parenthood that held the plot and characters really tight, we saw it in Emma and Snow’s conversations and how Emma feels that she’s a lost girl, we saw it in Emma’s drive to save her son (“I choose Henry”), we saw it in Regina in “Save Henry” (“All I have is him”), we saw it in Neal and Henry, and the parallels to Rumple and Baelfire and of course Pan and Rumple. This season was great on its own and in how it connects to the overall thems of the entire series (1-3A) which ultimately gave the most satisfying and the best conclusion of all the seasons. Then came 3B and it went downhill ever since. My biggest problem is the way they handled Neal. In the beginning of the season we had Regina teasing Emma about Hook being her “boyfriend” and Snow said “she just lost Neal”, Emma’s reaction was “how can you be so insensitive after I lost someone I love and care about”, but when Neal actually died, approximately 3-4 days after according to the shows timeline she got together with Hook, how is this consistent in anyway?! You want them to be together? Fine, but do it organically, otherwise ot doesn’t make sense. Keep them apart long enough for Emma to grieve and for Hook to make amends with the people he hurt like Archie and Belle, and perhaps even Rumple. But that’s not the only thing, it seemed like they didn’t want to pay attention to details in order for things to make sense in the larger scope of the series so we get weird stuff like Cora being betrothed to Leopold even when it didn’t make sense with 118, we get splitting heart “twist” even if it doesn’t align with what we know about magical hearts and it contradicts the dead is dead rule, we get scenes like the heroes starting shooting flying monkeys, which we learned (in the same episode) that those are innocent people who got turned into flying monkeys by Zelena, and then no reaction by them after learning that they killed innocent people (these peasants nobody cares about). But the worst thing is how they turned Emma into a huge mcguffin that never had any significant role in the arc, except her becoming Hook’s girlfriend. They never needed to cast the DC again, all they needed to do was give Regina a pep talk and then she’s good to defeat Zelena (that’s what actually happened). Emma got shoved aside in order to focus on the fan favorites Regina and Hook. By the end of season the forcibly got the characters to where they wanted them to be and now they go through a recycled character arc that gets resetted each season, they ignore past events, they ignore what the characters used to be and what motivated them like Rumple who was turned into a different character entirely, or Snow and Charming who suddenly have no reaction towards Ingrid, a woman who raised their long lost daughter for a time, which not being able to raise their child was a key element in their characterization and arc. The showrunners gave into fanservice and their decision making is based on that, the fans want CS -kill Neal and pretend like he never existed, the fans want SQ – lots and lots of queerbaiting, the fans like Disney – Frozen and Brave fanfics with ridiculous blue hair for Hades. Robin is boring (because they didn’t make the effort to develope him properly) – Kill him off, fans are angry that Robin was killed – bring him back. In conclusion, they don’t try to tell a compelling story with compelling characters. They try to have the series as long as they can by doing fanservice time after time in the hopes it would give them high enough ratings to get renewed. That is really the problem with OUAT.
I completely agree with everything you have said. The season 3A finale for me was amazing, and so bittersweet. I had memories of not liking the Peter Pan arc but having gone back and watched from the beginning, I too feel that 3B is where the show started to go down hill. I couldn’t believe how much like old school Once the show felt when Emma, Snow, Hook, Charming and Neal were in the cave having real conversations about how they felt and the events that have shaped their lives. I really miss that. I feel like the show is trying to get back to that but I really don’t think that they will ever fully succeed, which is really sad. I also never bought Emma and Hook, and as much as they keep throwing that in the fore, I don’t think I ever will. Her chemistry with Neal just leaps off the screen and doesn’t feel forced or theatrical, I unfortunately don’t feel that at all with her and Hook. I want to, because then I would enjoy the show more, but as it has been pointed out – it doesn’t feel organic. I really enjoyed a lot about the Frozen arc, but I do wonder if actually they should have just gone the snow queen route and left out the stunt of using Frozen to promote the show.
December 19, 2016 at 1:05 pm #332238PriceofMagicParticipantThen came season 3A and I was willing to forgive them about the problems of season 2B. I see that this season is not among the favorable seasons and it’s a shame, it really is underated. What is so great about 3A is that it had a strong theme of family and parenthood that held the plot and characters really tight, we saw it in Emma and Snow’s conversations and how Emma feels that she’s a lost girl, we saw it in Emma’s drive to save her son (“I choose Henry”), we saw it in Regina in “Save Henry” (“All I have is him”), we saw it in Neal and Henry, and the parallels to Rumple and Baelfire and of course Pan and Rumple. This season was great on its own and in how it connects to the overall thems of the entire series (1-3A) which ultimately gave the most satisfying and the best conclusion of all the seasons.
I disagree to an extent. I think 3A and the Neverland arc had potential to be fantastic but instead the writers squandered it. CS vs SF became the main plotline, it was dark all the time so you could barely see what was going on despite Neverland having been seen in daylight before, they didn’t explore Baelfire’s time in Neverland despite that being the perfect opportunity to do it also you’d get Hook’s back story as well considering that’s the tale he originated from. For me, Neverland could’ve been amazing but it wasn’t so it’s the season with the most wasted opportunity.
Then came 3B and it went downhill ever since. My biggest problem is the way they handled Neal. In the beginning of the season we had Regina teasing Emma about Hook being her “boyfriend” and Snow said “she just lost Neal”, Emma’s reaction was “how can you be so insensitive after I lost someone I love and care about”, but when Neal actually died, approximately 3-4 days after according to the shows timeline she got together with Hook, how is this consistent in anyway?! You want them to be together? Fine, but do it organically, otherwise ot doesn’t make sense. Keep them apart long enough for Emma to grieve and for Hook to make amends with the people he hurt like Archie and Belle, and perhaps even Rumple.
Agreed. The writers throwing Neal under the bus and not dealing with the ramifications of his death is the biggest mistake the writers ever made on this show. Baelfire was the whole reason for the show to begin with.
But that’s not the only thing, it seemed like they didn’t want to pay attention to details in order for things to make sense in the larger scope of the series so we get weird stuff like Cora being betrothed to Leopold even when it didn’t make sense with 118, we get splitting heart “twist” even if it doesn’t align with what we know about magical hearts and it contradicts the dead is dead rule, we get scenes like the heroes starting shooting flying monkeys, which we learned (in the same episode) that those are innocent people who got turned into flying monkeys by Zelena, and then no reaction by them after learning that they killed innocent people (these peasants nobody cares about).
The moment there were other ways to get to our world, the show betrayed its original premise. The dark curse was supposed the only way hence why Rumple spent his time trying to create it. The “heroes” became very unlikeable from season 3B onwards. Snow was the worst because she became completely thick and was a bit of a harpy.
But the worst thing is how they turned Emma into a huge mcguffin that never had any significant role in the arc, except her becoming Hook’s girlfriend. They never needed to cast the DC again, all they needed to do was give Regina a pep talk and then she’s good to defeat Zelena (that’s what actually happened). Emma got shoved aside in order to focus on the fan favorites Regina and Hook.
Agreed. In fact, if Regina had just got her act in gear, the events of 3B could’ve been avoided. Also Regina never did that particular magic again, it was such a crappy plot device. The split seasons did not do OUAT any favours at all when the writers tried to condense a 22 episode arc into 11 episodes. The writing became sloppy, the story became plot driven rather than character driven and overall everything just became shallow with no real depth to it.
By the end of season the forcibly got the characters to where they wanted them to be and now they go through a recycled character arc that gets resetted each season, they ignore past events, they ignore what the characters used to be and what motivated them like Rumple who was turned into a different character entirely, or Snow and Charming who suddenly have no reaction towards Ingrid, a woman who raised their long lost daughter for a time, which not being able to raise their child was a key element in their characterization and arc.
Agreed. There was no time for the characters to actually emote any sort of feeling.
The showrunners gave into fanservice and their decision making is based on that, the fans want CS -kill Neal and pretend like he never existed, the fans want SQ – lots and lots of queerbaiting, the fans like Disney – Frozen and Brave fanfics with ridiculous blue hair for Hades. Robin is boring (because they didn’t make the effort to develope him properly) – Kill him off, fans are angry that Robin was killed – bring him back.
I hated Anna in the Frozen arc and the fact that it became so Frozen focussed makes Season 4A the weakest for me.
All magic comes with a price!
Keeper of FelixDecember 19, 2016 at 4:04 pm #332241RainbowParticipantI think 3A and the Neverland arc had potential to be fantastic but instead the writers squandered it. CS vs SF became the main plotline, it was dark all the time so you could barely see what was going on despite Neverland having been seen in daylight before, they didn’t explore Baelfire’s time in Neverland despite that being the perfect opportunity to do it also you’d get Hook’s back story as well considering that’s the tale he originated from. For me, Neverland could’ve been amazing but it wasn’t so it’s the season with the most wasted opportunity.
Agree with this, i mean instead of having stories about NVL characters, they had episodes about medusas, the only characters that had stories with NVL characters and was not even NVL, was Rumple/Bae in EF with Pan before Bae leaving EF. when pan was trying to take bae to EF, Regina that meet Tink in EF, however that timeline almost doesnt fits, bc Tink should have a story with Rumple not Regina, bc then means she didnt had time to meet Bae, bc probably when she went to NVL , was almost time to Bae to leave to LWM, Hook before being hook, there was no story explaining what the hell was the home office, how was that the darling brothers were stop in time in LWM and have the same look all this time( probably by having lots of portals to NVL, but again not fitting in to the show story), how is that Tamara and greg that were against magic decide to use magic beans to go to a magical place, who gave Pan henry pic, how is that Bae that was all those centuries in NVL, never knew Wendy was there too, how did Tamara knew who Neal was, what made Hnery the Truest believer, but no, we had no answers these questions.
In S3B was simply awful, not only they went with killing neal but they also cut Neal screen time, instead of pushing him, also lots of questions not answered, how did Zelena knew that they were trying to bring Rumple back , in order to set traps in the dark castle, if the only person canon wise to know that was HOOk, that by the way, could not know that, bc he was already to far to heard that, however he did sounded like he knew Neal was going to die on the jello scene.
Agree, as well with the problem that was ignoring Neals dead, like was no big, like he still didnt had a lot of his story to tell , but no, they did everything about SF, they forgot all the other connections the character had, so if ship was not happening, everything else had to end, the character had to be killed and ignored, i mean in other shows, they have no problem in using characters deaths to push the story, and even remember the character with meaning some seasons after many years have pass( not with some of the mentions that they some times have in ouat about Neal, like having CS using Neal/Bae name to trash Rumple), also in other shows, they would have use Henry to take Bae place as the light in Rumple `s heart, instead they totally pretend Henry has no relation to Rumple. I mean they even say that on interviews, like they sometimes forget the connection btw the 2, i mean if the writers forget, that means that the GA will forget it too.
Another problem after S3, like many said already here, the scenes are not natural, feel forced, is possible to see that the cast doesn`t believe in what they are saying or doing anymore, like there is no need bc in the next episode they will retcon the previous one.
Also, the timeline is the more horrible thing i ever saw, being the biggest examples , Henry age that every season they contradict, however they keep the year of SF meeting as 2001, which makes no sense Henry having 10 in the pilot, 11 in spring on 2012, then they hint his birthday is in August and after one year in 2013 has 13 years even tho only 2 years have pass since the pilot then that also means that he should have 12 and not 13, well he should have 11 if we count 9 months pregnancy, but moving on, this timeline also means that if we take 1 year on EF/NY, all these characters only know each other one year.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘The problem with OUAT’ is closed to new replies.