- This topic has 14 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
It’s less than a month until Once Upon a Time’s series finale. Is there anything you can tease with regards to Snowing? –Katrina
Heck, at press time we are now less than three weeks away! So I better hurry out this excerpt from my chat with Josh Dallas. Teasing the key role that Charming and Snow play in the two-night finale, he said, “We’ve got some nice moments — ones that pay homage not only to Once as a whole, but to those two characters.” (Dallas, who squeezed the encore in while filming his NBC pilot in New York, also eased my mind by confirming that Prince Neal is, finally, no longer a baby. “He makes an appearance, and he’s about nine or 10.”)Do you have anything on Sean Maguire’s return to Once Upon a Time? —–Sara
Lana Parrilla told me it was “a complete joy to have Sean back and to get to tell the Regina and Robin story again,” as the ABC series nears its very end. “I just love working with him, and I know how excited the fans will be when they see one of their favorite couples reunited.”Source: http://tvline.com/2018/05/02/lucifer-season-3-spoilers-deaths/
[adrotate group="5"]How can baby Neal be ten and Lucy be ten? And then Emma’s second child is a baby? I know that there is just no logical explanation here. If baby Neal and Emma’s second child are ten and a baby in Storybrooke where it is supposedly the past and then baby Neal and the second child are older later that could work, but i don’t really think they are doing that as far as we know.
Is it at all possible that Emma is in two scenes? Seems unlikely since Jennifer is so anti the show now and only filmed one day. They could film two things in one day though. Who knows. Her scenes are going to be terrible anyways.
How can baby Neal be ten and Lucy be ten? And then Emma’s second child is a baby? I know that there is just no logical explanation here. If baby Neal and Emma’s second child are ten and a baby in Storybrooke where it is supposedly the past and then baby Neal and the second child are older later that could work, but i don’t really think they are doing that as far as we know. Is it at all possible that Emma is in two scenes? Seems unlikely since Jennifer is so anti the show now and only filmed one day. They could film two things in one day though. Who knows. Her scenes are going to be terrible anyways.
My thoughts exactly. Prince Neal should be about Robin’s age or a little older. And as for Emma, there needs to be an explanation why she would not be part of helping Henry or others in this ep.
Though for Snowing, this seems to make me happy, and you wonder why they were teased to be the only ones who got our other Character’s call instead of Emma.
How can baby Neal be ten and Lucy be ten? And then Emma’s second child is a baby? I know that there is just no logical explanation here. If baby Neal and Emma’s second child are ten and a baby in Storybrooke where it is supposedly the past and then baby Neal and the second child are older later that could work, but i don’t really think they are doing that as far as we know.
Is it at all possible that Emma is in two scenes? Seems unlikely since Jennifer is so anti the show now and only filmed one day. They could film two things in one day though. Who knows. Her scenes are going to be terrible anyways.
Considering the promo for this week’s episode shows adult Henry calling young Henry, I think time travel is somehow involved. That’s why it is apparently only 2017 in Hyperion Heights, and why Regina said that those in Storybrooke couldn’t know. Cause theoretically, the past versions of Regina, Henry and the others should all be there. That’s also why Robin is an adult, while baby Neal isn’t. I think the writers just didn’t want to deal with future tech, while having an explanation for why everyone else in Storybrooke isn’t able to help out.
I know, but none of that is logical. Are they really going to have older Henry stay in Storybrooke with younger Henry? That makes no sense. Whatever they are going to do is going to be awkward and just why.
“He makes an appearance, and he’s about nine or 10.”)
…..
…..
so LOTS of time travel next week. No just a one off with the Henrys.
‘kay, then
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"It almost seems like the curse caused them to go back in time, but how do they know that? I doubt there is going to be a reason that this happened. It just did because plot and reasons.
Even if there was some time travel, I don’t get how Robyn–in Storybrooke, before she and Zelena went to the EF 2.0–is eighteen. She’s not that much younger than Baby Snowflake. They were only born about a year-ish apart.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"I told you guys…there has been a story here woven in…starting with the Pilot and when we rewatch the entire show we will see it has been there all along. I am not on here very much but I’ve said it for years…I trust Eddie and Adam to know what they are doing in the big picture. As long as the approach is negative you can never find the clues because you are not looking for them. My theories may not end up being right…but…I know there is an untold story. I believe it will go back to little monster Snow…it will have a Mary Shelley Frankensteinish twist and more. If I am wrong it will still be something huge. They have had ot planned since the beginning.
Twitter - @Milkglass123
The topic ‘TVLine Matt's Inside Line 5/2 – Snowing and Robin Hood Scoop’ is closed to new replies.