ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast

Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show

  • Home
  • Once Upon a Time
  • Wonderland
  • Forums
    • Recent posts
    • Recent posts (with spoilers)
  • Timeline
  • Live
  • Sponsor
    • Privacy Policy

Reply To: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire

Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Character discussion › Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire › Reply To: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire

March 3, 2014 at 12:56 am #249521
RumplesGirl
Keymaster

No matter how Emma gets it back, the important part is that she’s wearing it again. She’s keeping Neal close–just like she’s always done. Even going into the heart of darkness in NL, she kept his sword strapped to her back. If Emma has ZERO feelings for Neal, she really did only keep the necklace to remind herself never to trust anyone ever again, then why would she be wearing it now?! If Neal meant nothing to her–just a former flame and Henry’s father–if she REALLY WANTED TO MOVE ON, why take that symbolic object and put it back on? If the object had lost it’s symbolic significance to her (she no longer cared for Neal, she could never forgive him, she rejected the idea of a second chance) she wouldn’t wear it again. In other words: Emma Swan has never stopped loving Neal. She will never stop loving Neal. And she will show that to the world by wearing her swan pendant

#BOOM

[adrotate group="5"]

"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"

Design by Daniel J. Lewis | D.Joseph Design • Built on the Genesis Framework