agree. Everyone was happy to kill Pan when they thought he was a threat to Henry. They took him over the town line so he would be powerless and Emma planned to shoot him in the head.
1) We do not know that Emma was going to shoot him in the head. She had the gun for protection. Malevolent intent has not been established. In fact they take Panry out to the town line to TALK, because Emma is very suspcious that something is going on with Henry.
2) No one was planning on killing Pan. In fact we don’t know what the overall plan was. They might have just been planning to swap bodies and then put the real Pan in the box.
I bet if the heart of the truest believer had belonged to anyone else other than Henry who wasn’t in the CharmingMillsStiltskin family circle, the heroes wouldn’t have even intervened, Pan would’ve succeeded in living forever and everybody would’ve just gone about their daily business.
That is one big assumption that isn’t grounded in anything.
There should’ve been a trial but their wasn’t. There’s a reason why victims and the families of the perpetrators aren’t allowed to be on a jury at their trial.
There absolutely should have been a trial. But Rumple took the law and justice into his own hands. He wasn’t getting justice, he was getting revenge.