Belle’s absolutely right, but like Henry with Regina she’s probably going to have to accept SOME dark magic
Ahhh, but isn’t that dangerous? “Yes, dear. You can use dark magic for this case because of reason XYZ.” What happens next time? Should it really be a case by case basis or should be simply No Dark Magic, Full Stop.
I agree. Where do you draw the line? It’s a little bit here, a little bit there, then some more next time and more after that. In fact that is exactly how addictions start: you have a substance (alcohol, drugs) and you get a buzz so you keep doing it to get that buzz, however over time you body starts to build up a resistance so then it takes a little bit more of the substance to get that same buzz and over time it’ll just keep building and building until you end up with a full blown addiction.
My question would be what defines dark magic? what makes magic dark? Is it a force that can be used for good AND evil like the internet and it all depends on the user, or is there an actual this magic is bad/this magic is good mentality going on?
Rumple was the “light one” in the AU although in reality he was the “dark one” (he said in the AU that the magic had no price because it’s light magic yet throughout the show we’ve constantly been reminded that ALL magic comes with a price). The fairies use magic and there supposed to be good (although Blue is sneaky fairy). If light magic and dark magic are separate entities, why can’t Rumple just tap into light magic? What makes the dark one the “dark one”?
All magic comes with a price!
Keeper of Felix