This was my issue before because I was such a big proponent of him going to Neverland and everybody said there’s no way he did because it’s a land without magic.
Then this week, everything I said about him coming here first and then getting transported to Neverland, just like Wendy and everyone else in the stories of Peter Pan, is shown and makes perfect sense OTHER than the fact that he made some weird comment about it earlier on.
All season long I’ve been fighting for Neverland because it DOES make sense that he came here first and then went there because we know how people from London travelled back and forth in that story. There wasn’t anything that didn’t make that possible from the traditional Peter Pan story.
But now we have it and it’s still confusing! If it weren’t for that one stupid line of NealFire’s it would all be fine because it would make sense. The only way it doesn’t is if it’s some alternate version of London but then how the heck does that fit in with anything?
Who wrote the episode with that line in it? I swear somebody just didn’t catch it and thought they were being so clever hinting at Neverland without realizing that they were actually contradicting earlier stuff and that he did come here ever so briefly before going to Neverland.
Keeper of Hook's Trenchcoat.