ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast

Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show

  • Home
  • Once Upon a Time
  • Wonderland
  • Forums
    • Recent posts
    • Recent posts (with spoilers)
  • Timeline
  • Live
  • Sponsor
    • Privacy Policy

Reply To: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire

Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Character discussion › Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire › Reply To: Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire

November 20, 2013 at 3:41 am #225217
Phee
Participant

You will never convince me that Neal’s “Believe in Second Chances” poster wasn’t a real one. I don’t care who says it or what they do with it…that poster was never claimed to be created by anyone in the fandom and at one point, Adam did confirm it was real (which has always stuck with me). I think ABC chickened out on using it because they want their Hook angle and showing anything like that for Neal would disrupt their current marketing strategy. I really wish they would get their nose out of OUAT and let Adam & Eddie tell their stories without the marketing push for something they may or may not have planned this season.

AGREED!

The post is essentally arguing that: if we were use symbology… *ahem* something that happens on this show *ahem*

David’s Poison = Emma’s endgame ship

Hook’s cure = temporary and immediate. Enough to last to #SaveHenry

Neal’s Cure/Solution = the forever fixer, guaranteed to keep “David” safe and alive forever

https://www.tumblr.com/schmacky/67485319453/this-just-came-to-me-bewarethere-be-triangles

No idea if it carries any weight but I found it interesting and least better than groaning over internet hoards and their rumor mills

If you click the link and check the post, it was actually written by a CSer, who ends the post with, “And I call myself a Captain Swan shipper… I should be ashamed of myself… (This did start with the thought, “Aww… both sides of the triangle are contributing to her daddy’s cure,” and then quickly descended into, “Uh oh…”).” So it didn’t even start out being written from a SF biased viewpoint. Obviously I DO have a biased viewpoint, so it just sounds like a perfectly logical explanation to me, but the fact that it was written by someone who has the opposing ship view makes it an all the more interesting analysis to me.

[adrotate group="5"]

Design by Daniel J. Lewis | D.Joseph Design • Built on the Genesis Framework