ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast

Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show

  • Home
  • Once Upon a Time
  • Wonderland
  • Forums
    • Recent posts
    • Recent posts (with spoilers)
  • Timeline
  • Live
  • Sponsor
    • Privacy Policy

2007?? What is the basis of this and is it still true?

Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › General discussion and theories › 2007?? What is the basis of this and is it still true?

  • This topic has 24 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 10 months ago by timespacer.
Viewing 5 posts - 21 through 25 (of 25 total)
← 1 2 3
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 4, 2013 at 1:24 am #176636
    stef
    Participant

    Am bumping this because a 2007-2008 date for the events of OUAT might be a shout-out to LOST.

    Emma arrives in Storybrooke in November 2007. The Losties return to the Island for their final big-boss battle showdown about the same time.

    Emma breaks the curse for good in early 2008 (late Feb or early Mar.) The big bad guy in LOST (the “man in black”) is defeated around that time as well, and a new leader/protector of the Island is chosen (Hurley, played by Jorge Garcia.)

    In other words, the two timelines are close enough for me to wonder if it’s another LOST reference.

    (dates are from the Lostpedia web site timeline (http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline:2005_and_beyond); they’re not exact calendar dates but are close enough.)

    [adrotate group="5"]

    March 4, 2013 at 2:49 pm #176896
    gypsy
    Participant

    In the Paleyfest interview it was confirmed that 1983 was the year of the curse.
    1983 + 28 = 2011.

    March 4, 2013 at 3:14 pm #176902
    TheGoldenKey
    Participant

    That’s right Gypsy. At PaleyFest, they were talking the upcoming ep. 2×17, Welcome to Storybrooke, Eddie Kitsis said” We are going to be seeing the first week of the curse……………and we are going to get more insight into what it was like that first week back in 1983…..”

    Keeper of Pandora's Box & The Yellow Brick Road.

    July 29, 2013 at 2:49 am #202574
    Nikki Gibbons Mirhosseyni
    Participant

    I think a fake story was put in the paper so as to not spoil the season 2 storyline.

    July 29, 2013 at 9:49 pm #202624
    timespacer
    Participant

    I think a fake story was put in the paper so as to not spoil the season 2 storyline.

    That’s the most likely explanation but I like to think that perhaps the paper was referring to another event we haven’t seen yet. Especially since Sidney knew in episode 2 of season one that “She had Henry in Phoenix” and the paper refers to Emma’s visit to Worcester, MA in 1996. Maybe we have yet to learn that someone was already manipulating events in her life when she was 16 (Peter Pan, maybe?)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 21 through 25 (of 25 total)
← 1 2 3

The topic ‘2007?? What is the basis of this and is it still true?’ is closed to new replies.

Design by Daniel J. Lewis | D.Joseph Design • Built on the Genesis Framework