Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Three › General S3 spoilers › Adam Answers Twitter Q’s!
Tagged: adam horowitz, twitter
- This topic has 860 replies, 48 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 3 months ago by obisgirl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 12, 2013 at 1:54 am #200229JosephineParticipant
Duplicate post
[adrotate group="5"]Keeper of Rumplestiltskin's and Neal's spears and war paint and crystal ball.
July 12, 2013 at 1:58 am #200233HappyEndingsSpectatorOk, thank you Josephine and Phee now I see where you all got that believing in Fairy thing. 😉
July 12, 2013 at 2:03 am #200234kfchimeraParticipantI missed the Emma’s laugh made Tinkerbell theory–oooh, interesting. That would mean Tink hasn’t been around all that long though, certainly not when PP began to hunt for Bae back in the day. So I’m not sure I like Tink being so “new” as all that.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
July 12, 2013 at 2:16 am #200235HappyEndingsSpectatorOnce Upon A Time are currently casting for the role of Violet. It’s a recurring role, starting in Episode 3.03.
She is in her 20’s, and is a head-strong party girl and often lands in trouble due to her inability to pass up a challenge or a prank.
If she is in her 20’s then couldn’t she be the same age as Emma, then maybe Tinkerbell was born the same time Emma was huh? If that is the case then Bae would have ever met her(Tink) wasn’t he in the states then?
July 12, 2013 at 2:25 am #200237PheeParticipantI missed the Emma’s laugh made Tinkerbell theory–oooh, interesting. That would mean Tink hasn’t been around all that long though, certainly not when PP began to hunt for Bae back in the day. So I’m not sure I like Tink being so “new” as all that.
Agreed. I’d like to see her being one of the oldest characters, on par with Blue.
July 12, 2013 at 2:56 am #200239HappyEndingsSpectatorOnce Upon A Time are currently casting for the role of Violet. It’s a recurring role, starting in Episode 3.03.
She is in her 20′s, and is a head-strong party girl and often lands in trouble due to her inability to pass up a challenge or a prank.
********If she is in her 20′s then couldn’t she be the same age as Emma, then maybe Tinkerbell was born the same time Emma was huh? If that is the case then Bae would have ever met her(Tink) wasn’t he in the states then?*********
Question: Are the rumors true about Once Upon a Time introducing Tinker Bell? —Bonnie
Ausiello: I’ll answer that question by describing to you the new character of Violet and letting you draw your own conclusions. How about that? Vi is a mischievous twentysomething whose penchant for troublemaking belies the heart of a true survivor. (Interesting side note, especially for Hook if she is Tinkerbell: She never lets a slight go unpunished!)
http://tvline.com/2013/07/09/bones-season-9-spoilers-the-secrets-in-the-proposal/***Hook, was frozen for 28 years so maybe Tink isn’t the same age as Emma but it is kind of a good theory though I think.*** 😉
July 12, 2013 at 3:06 am #200240kfchimeraParticipantCasting calls are not accurate character descriptions. They want an actress in her 20’s, but that does not mean the character is that age. Then we have the whole mental age versus biological versus chronological age thing. She could look 25, be over millenia old, and act about 5.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
July 12, 2013 at 3:11 am #200241HappyEndingsSpectatorCasting calls are not accurate character descriptions. They want an actress in her 20′s, but that does not mean the character is that age. Then we have the whole mental age versus biological versus chronological age thing. She could look 25, be over millenia old, and act about 5.
Yes, that is so true but the BF was frozen for 28 years and time is different in NL right?
Also, can we really believe what these spoilers say after all TV Line, vs. TV Guide information was different example: TV Line added that Hook comment did he have more information or was that just his own opinon?
July 12, 2013 at 3:22 am #200242kfchimeraParticipantHook being frozen would have no implication for necessarily concluding anything about Tink’s age, as he was frozen in a small bubble in FTL while Emma went from birth to 28. Everyone in SB also did not age during that time.
So if Tink was born, then got frozen in the bubble or cursed SB, she would be chronologically 1 or so. But fairies are shown as arriving the physical age they are, not as growing from baby to adults in the Disney Fairies version anyway. They pop out fully formed.
So OUAT could write fairies as originating that way (they showed Dwarves hatching fully grown, remember). If so, her age could be 1, but she’d look mid 20’s and act …well, it is Tinkerbell. She could be written as acting like anything from a mature woman to a small child, depends on how they want to go in OUAT.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
July 12, 2013 at 8:08 am #200250HappyEndingsSpectatorBut if Tink was born in NL and since NL is on another time schedule plus not being affected by the curse then she would be in her 20’s – 28 perhaps but that is why I don’t know if TV Line really knew about Tink and Hook or was that just another opinion?
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘Adam Answers Twitter Q’s!’ is closed to new replies.