- This topic has 660 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Rumple: It’s a cloaking spell. It’ll shield the town, make it impossible for anyone to find.
Belle: Then how will you find your way back to me?
Rumple: *awkward and sad*
Belle: You’re not coming back, are you?Belle knew they were going to another world, so having her ask that question says to me that SB is invisible to everyone, everywhere, so it can’t be located, even by portal.
[adrotate group="5"]Everyone is dying to learn more about Once Upon a Time’s twisted version of Peter Pan, but the writers are keeping most info about Season 3’s apparent villain under wraps. Fortunately, in a recent interview Lana Parrilla had some good news about when we can expect to learn more about this mysterious version of the iconic character.
E! caught up with the Once Upon a Time cast at Comic-Con 2013. Lana was asked when we’re going to find out who’s playing Peter Pan, and she promised, “Definitely in the first five episodes.” Yay! This doesn’t come as a huge shock, but we’re glad to know the Peter reveal isn’t being held to the end of the season or anything like that.
Exactly how evil is Peter, anyway? When asked if Peter will be badder than Regina, Lana said she hopes not, but then quickly revised that: “Maybe the audience hopes so, because there’ll be some serious battles!”
She added that part of the fun is that Peter is “so mysterious, and this land is so foreign, that we just have no idea that we’re going to encounter.”
Meanwhile, Jennifer Morrison said that she’s just as curious as the fans to learn more about Peter and why he’s so different from the storybook version of the character we all know and love. “Emma does point out very quickly — she’s like, ‘listen, I’ve read these stories, and he’s always nice. I don’t get it, why are we so afraid of this guy?'”
Of course, as Jennifer went on muse, “a villainous 17-year-old boy does sound kind of terrifying.”
http://www.wetpaint.com/once-upon-a-time/articles/2013-07-26-season-3-spoiler-peter-pan
See the “HE” isn’t PP, it is someone else that is meaner.
What in that article do you think suggests that “he” isn’t PP?
Exact dialogue from ASOTM…
Random Lost One: If that’s not the boy he’s looking for, do you think we’ll be able to find him?
Felix: Of course we will, it may take time, but Peter Pan never fails.That dialogue seems pretty straight forward to me. Felix’s line reveals that the “he” the other guy mentioned is PP. That’s who they’re working for. That’s who wants the kid in the picture.
If you wanna go back to the scene immediately before that, when they’re on the boat, about to go down the portal…
Charming: Who are we up against? Who are Greg and Tamara?
Rumple: They’re merely pawns, manipulated by forces far greater than they can conceive, with no idea who they’re truly working for.
Emma: And who’s that?
Rumple: Someone we all should fear.That leads directly into the scene where that person who should be feared is named as PP.
At 3:30 in this interview, speaking about GOAT…
Adam: They were anti-magic, very fundamentalist against magic, and yet, they did not realise, as we learned at the end, that they are actually working for Peter Pan.
GOAT were unwittingly working for PP.
GOAT took Henry to NL for PP.
The Lost Ones had been searching for Henry to take him to PP.
PP is the “he” that all of them are working for, helping him to get the kid in the picture.Exactly how evil is Peter, anyway? When asked if Peter will be badder than Regina, Lana said she hopes not, but then quickly revised that: “Maybe the audience hopes so, because there’ll be some serious battles!”
Because of this Regina can defeat him.
Of course, as Jennifer went on muse, “a villainous 17-year-old boy does sound kind of terrifying.”
Isn’t this the kid that was just cast with the big ears?
Yes, we all know that Tamara and Owen are working for PP and they don’t know it, again to me that isn’t the “HE” that they are talking about I could be wrong but I think it is PP and then there is “HE” two separate people.
Because of this Regina can defeat him.
We don’t know if Regina can defeat him. Lana doesn’t know if Regina can defeat him. Like all the actors said in every interview that all they know for sure is what’s in the scripts for the first 2 episodes. Of course Lana will say that she hopes PP isn’t badder than Regina, because if PP is bigger and badder than Regina, it’s gonna make it harder for Regina to get her son back.
Isn’t this the kid that was just cast with the big ears?
We are assuming so, yes. Robert said the young actor playing PP looks like him even without makeup, right down to the big ears.
Yes, we all know that Tamara and Owen are working for PP and they don’t know it, again to me that isn’t the “HE” that they are talking about I could be wrong but I think it is PP and then there is “HE” two separate people.
Well IMO the dialogue in the finale is clear cut. Felix names PP as someone who never fails in his response to the guy who says: “If that’s not the boy he’s looking for, do you think we’ll be able to find him?” Why would Felix name PP if he wasn’t the “he” that their conversation was about?
Exactly how evil is Peter, anyway? When asked if Peter will be badder than Regina, Lana said she hopes not, but then quickly revised that: “Maybe the audience hopes so, because there’ll be some serious battles!”
Because of this Regina can defeat him.
Of course, as Jennifer went on muse, “a villainous 17-year-old boy does sound kind of terrifying.”
Isn’t this the kid that was just cast with the big ears? Yes, we all know that Tamara and Owen are working for PP and they don’t know it, again to me that isn’t the “HE” that they are talking about I could be wrong but I think it is PP and then there is “HE” two separate people.
I honestly don’t understand why you’re confused. Lana Parrilla was supposing that Peter Pan could be so powerful that even Regina might struggle to defeat him. Also, the kid with the big ears (aka Robbie Kay) probably IS Peter Pan, according to an interview with Robert Carlyle. Peter is the “He” which Felix was talking about, and Peter Pan is also the villainous 17-year-old Jennifer Morrison mentioned in her interview. Peter and “He” are one-in-the-same.
"That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
From a storytelling point of view, having an extra villain when we are doing the “Neverland mythology” makes no sense. You don’t make Peter Pan the “extra” in his own story. And as Phee pointed out, the exact dialogue of ASOTM shows that HE and PP are the same. They are grammatically linked.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"HappingEngdings wrote: Yes, we all know that Tamara and Owen are working for PP and they don’t know it, again to me that isn’t the “HE” that they are talking about I could be wrong but I think it is PP and then there is “HE” two separate people.
Well IMO the dialogue in the finale is clear cut. Felix names PP as someone who never fails in his response to the guy who says: “If that’s not the boy he’s looking for, do you think we’ll be able to find him?” Why would Felix name PP if he wasn’t the “he” that their conversation was about?
Phee, I agree completely with you. To me, it’s an open-and-shut case. A Lost One uses “he” as a pronoun in a question, and Felix clearly answers using the proper noun, Peter Pan, in direct reference to pronoun “He” used in the question. Also, “He” was used so much in Second Star to the Right in order to build up the suspence and then that pronoun was finally confirmed as referring to Peter Pan in And Straight On “Til Morning. (It’s parallel to when “She” was played up so much to build suspense and then “She” was confirmed as referring to Tamara in Selfless, Brave, and True).
"That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
The topic ‘Comic-Con Date 2013: July 20 (SPOILERS)’ is closed to new replies.