ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast

Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show

  • Home
  • Once Upon a Time
  • Wonderland
  • Forums
    • Recent posts
    • Recent posts (with spoilers)
  • Timeline
  • Live
  • Sponsor
    • Privacy Policy

Did Tinker Bell lie?

Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Three › 3×04 “Nasty Habits” › Did Tinker Bell lie?

  • This topic has 7 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by RumplesGirl.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 23, 2013 at 7:52 am #218148
    lyanna
    Participant

    I’ve been thinking about what Tinker Bell said in this episode about Greg and Tamara. That she took the watch from Tamara and it was covered in blood, but we saw Rumple killing her and it wasn’t bloody, neither was the arrow wound. And Greg had his shadow ripped but the rest of his body was “intact” and Tinker Bell said there wasn’t much of him left. Was she lying to discourage the others from entering the camp?

    I don’t know if this makes any sense but it got me thinking. I would like her to be secretly working for PP.

    [adrotate group="5"]

    October 23, 2013 at 8:36 am #218150
    swanning-off
    Participant

    I assumed that other beasties on the island (not the Lost Boys, actual animals) had nommed on GOAT’s remains before Tink got to scavenge them.

    October 23, 2013 at 8:42 am #218152
    PriceofMagic
    Participant

    I was thinking that too swanning-off. I would like to see Neal come across Tamara’s remains so he can get closure over what she did.

    All magic comes with a price!

    Keeper of Felix
    October 24, 2013 at 6:45 am #218425
    kpercyman
    Participant

    In the context it sounded as if she referred to the Lost Boys because it was after they said they didn’t have an exit plan.

    This is the part of the show that freaked me out. It was a gut wrenching comment and makes me feel even worse for Greg and Tamara.

    October 24, 2013 at 7:03 am #218427
    Phee
    Participant

    I assumed that other beasties on the island (not the Lost Boys, actual animals) had nommed on GOAT’s remains before Tink got to scavenge them.

    This is what I assumed too. Also, “nommed on GOAT’s remains,” made me laugh. Om nom nom.

    October 24, 2013 at 7:25 am #218428
    lyanna
    Participant

    In the context it sounded as if she referred to the Lost Boys because it was after they said they didn’t have an exit plan.

    That’s what I thought. “This is what Pan does to people he employs, what do you think he’s going to do to you?” It seemed to me she’ was referring to the Lost Boys and not beasts.

    October 24, 2013 at 8:13 am #218433
    kfchimera
    Participant

    Tink is a wild card still.  Why does Pan trust her?

    “If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass

    October 24, 2013 at 8:59 am #218438
    RumplesGirl
    Keymaster

    Tink is a wild card still. Why does Pan trust her?

    Yeah I agree with this. While I think we *can* trust her–based on how she spoke about PP, with a sort of fear–the fact that PP does trust her means we need to keep a close eye on her, because she may switch sides.

    "He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

The topic ‘Did Tinker Bell lie?’ is closed to new replies.

Design by Daniel J. Lewis | D.Joseph Design • Built on the Genesis Framework