Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Character discussion › Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire
- This topic has 25,813 replies, 124 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 10 months ago by
RumplesGirl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 13, 2014 at 11:43 pm #269336
Phee
ParticipantCorbin, I’m so sorry for what you’ve been through. *SUPER MASSIVE HUGS* Though some may leave this place, rest assured there will be those who stay. This forum has become like a home to me as well over the last couple of years, which is a contributing factor to why I can’t ditch the show.
[adrotate group="5"]May 14, 2014 at 12:02 am #269340RumplesGirl
KeymasterHook’s line in the finale (3×21), “One of these days, I’m going to stop chasing this woman.” Neal wouldn’t have ever said that. Neal would’ve let go the minute Emma did, because he loved her wholeheartedly. No snark needed.
I hated that line. Because it means that she was running and suddenly Savior-I-killed-a-freaking-dragon Emma Swan became a thing to be caught. Like a wild animal.
As to your other stuff
*huge massive hugs* We love you baby Bison. And yes. This is home. Always will be."He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"May 14, 2014 at 12:10 am #269342Corbin
ParticipantThanks guys, your support means the world to me 🙂
The entire episode just made me think, “This could’ve been Neal! This could’ve been Neal!!!!!!!”
Keeper of Thor’s Hammer, Will Scarlet’s Genie Bottle, Emma’s Gun, Emma and Henry’s Moment at the Castle, Cora, and the infamous Family Tree!
May 14, 2014 at 12:11 am #269344kfchimera
ParticipantCorbin, great big hugs, and I am glad this place gives you some solace and comfort when you need it.
I feel the same about the forum, but I feel I need a new show to discuss. I think I want to avoid the whole speculation angle but I enjoyed hearing others views and excitement, like a book club but for tv. I love fantasy and scifi, but the light, hopeful kind that reminds you there is good in the world.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
May 14, 2014 at 12:21 am #269345RumplesGirl
Keymasterfeel the same about the forum, but I feel I need a new show to discuss. I think I want to avoid the whole speculation angle but I enjoyed hearing others views and excitement, like a book club but for tv. I love fantasy and scifi, but the light, hopeful kind that reminds you there is good in the world.
Galavant!!! It’s start in Winter but I think it’s going to be so cheesy and corny that we’ll love it.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"May 14, 2014 at 12:35 am #269346lunatiger
ParticipantCorbin wrote:
Hook’s line in the finale (3×21), “One of these days, I’m going to stop chasing this woman.” Neal wouldn’t have ever said that. Neal would’ve let go the minute Emma did, because he loved her wholeheartedly. No snark needed.
Yep I didn’t care much for that line. It just reinforces Hook’s constant unhealthy push towards Emma. That and they purposely push Emma’s boobs up her corset for Hook to leer at. UGH…. unnecessary… seriously if they want to sell Hook’s goody two shoes role, stop reminding me he’s a misogynistic womanizing *beep*
Hugs to you Corbin. I’m sorry you had to go through that. We all have our share of life’s troubles, mine included. This is our home alright. Even though I’m not interested in catching the show on Sundays next season, I’ll still pop in this thread. But I’m still grateful that it introduces us to a great real life fairy-tale show while it lasted and made friends along the way that shared that passion.
May 14, 2014 at 12:57 am #269350Phee
ParticipantI was typing something larger on transit this morning and this part started happening. I don’t know yet if/where it will fit in the larger scheme of what I was writing, but I felt like sharing this now in case it turns into nothing.
I bought into the potential of their beautiful love story because I don’t have one of my own. I bought in to mantra of hope and happy endings because I live in fear everyday that I won’t get one of my own. I loved Neal and Swanfire for so many reasons, but among them being that I don’t need or want an epic love story with a charming and daring rapscallion or prince. I just want a solid love story, one that feels true down to my bones. I don’t need adventure, I just want home. I want to be with someone who’s arms feel safe, who is my equal. I want a love story with forgiveness and patience. I want to know that however we are separated, by time or by distance, that fate will bring us together again. It will take work, but we’ll be stronger for it in the end, and it will make us better people.
I have never seen a relationship on TV, a connection closer to what I want than Swanfire, and all the things it had the potential of being. Swanfire may not have gotten a chance to see through all these possibilities, but there was so much potential, so many ways it could have played out. Swanfire was my hope and my escape, but it is a story that will remain without the end I was so hoping for. It makes me look at my own life and wonder if that hope for a love story, that hope for a happy ending will be just as unfulfilled.
This is beautiful, and sad, but such a perfect and beautiful explanation of the appeal of SF, and how it could inspire people. *HUGS*
Speaking for myself, I was in love once, I was married, I took it for granted that we would have a forever future and a happy ending. Then I ended up on the receiving end of “I love you, but I’m not in love with you,” (*barf*) and all the love, all the hopes, all the dreams, all the extended family, went *POOF* outta my life. Since then I’ve come to envy couples who go the distance, who get that dream I used to have of sharing a lifetime with someone and growing old with them, no matter the obstacles along the way. But I didn’t envy SF, instead they just made me appreciate that kind of enduring love. I didn’t begrudge them for having it, I wasn’t bitter, instead I was elated for them that they still had it, and it was a beautiful and powerful thing and it just made me happy that that kind of love exists. But I guess at the end of the day, enduring love doesn’t really matter and the happy ending still can’t happen. Oh well. *sigh*
May 14, 2014 at 1:16 am #269354Phee
ParticipantYou know who would’ve been the right person? Neal, would’ve been, as Henry’s father and as the son of Rumple. Emma and Neal could’ve talked about their lives in NYC and how great it was, but then Neal could’ve told Emma about his own reconciliation with his dad. Neal could’ve been the one to help reconcile with her own parents. Neal could’ve talked about the importance of family, and how he’d always wished he’d had it and he wished that for Henry. Even aside from their own potential romantic reconciliation, Emma and Neal both had multiple ties to SB. Neal being the one would’ve just made sense, since he was the one who told her about missing home in the first place.
*sobbing because of how accurate this is* They even touched on it in the scene on the boat as they were about to leave NL, when Emma watched Neal reconcile with Rumple. THEY WERE ALREADY LAYING THE GROUNDWORK FOR THEM TO BOND OVER THIS STUFF SO WHY DID THEY JUST TRASH ALL THAT POTENTIAL?!?!? *tears out hair*
I’m taking a ride on the conspiracy train, back to the Tent of Doom, after MRJ nodded to on the Waterfront–a story about a guy forced to lose a fight because of corruption and unfair dealing.
I can’t blame you for being on that Conspiracy Train. MRJ choosing to ad-lib the nod to that movie does feel like it would be a bit of a middle finger to events that saw Neal written out.
More than that though? I don’t think they do have deep plans. I think it was disturbing in the last interview when they talked about how they felt like taking another toy off the shelf so now we get Frozen. I felt this moment I do with my children–NO, put the other toys away FIRST, then take another! That’s why their story is off kilter, they are like children grabbing at the shiny stuff, and while at first there’s fun and whimsy in that, eventually its chaotic and contradictory, because there’s a lack of cohesion in the story.
Yeah that comment made me groan as well. I know they’ve used the “we have so many toys to play with” line before, and it didn’t bother me in those other instances, but in this particular case it just smacks of “OOOOO SHINY TOY WANT TO PLAY NOOOOOWWWWWW” and it just bugs that they can be so easily convinced to sway the story in a new direction.
Yet it won’t be TOLD on screen why Robin and Marian suddenly mean zip to each other. And the way it is written, they will probably be used as proof that even if Neal lived, that Emma wouldn’t have wanted to be with him. I’m sure she’ll end up saying that more or less.
I’m bracing myself for that. It’s sad that I have to emotionally detach myself from Emma who was once one of my fave characters, just so I can get through seeing how everyone else’s stories play out. That’s how I’m gonna have to watch S4, detached from Emma, just letting her do whatever and writing her off as not being relevant. I fear it’s the only way I’ll get through each ep without wanting to break things.
May 14, 2014 at 1:24 am #269357Phee
ParticipantWhat are they talking about this is EXACTLY how it HAPPEN!
http://swanfireheart.tumblr.com/post/85660477646/so-how-about-that-drink-tallahassee-baby
Oh, what could have been! This would have been perfect!
May 14, 2014 at 1:32 am #269359Phee
ParticipantThank you, Phee, for helping me figure out how I can cope with continuing to watch the show! It’s always been very difficult for me to give up on stories I once loved even when they get really silly; I’m, unfortunately, just in too deep with OUAT lol
Glad to be of assistance. We can live in blissful delusion together! LOL
Hook’s line in the finale (3×21), “One of these days, I’m going to stop chasing this woman.” Neal wouldn’t have ever said that. Neal would’ve let go the minute Emma did, because he loved her wholeheartedly. No snark needed.
I hated that line. Because it means that she was running and suddenly Savior-I-killed-a-freaking-dragon Emma Swan became a thing to be caught. Like a wild animal.
If I hadn’t already known the ending when I got to watching it, I’d have considered that foreshadowing that Hook was gonna grow up and back off. But nope. In the end, their inclusion of that line only serves to enhance how he eventually wore her down. Which is gross.
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire’ is closed to new replies.