- This topic has 221 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Ahhh–Frozen storyline on producers wishlist for season 4—-I’m so excited—but also secretly hoping for it to be a #WickedSisters flashback:) Also, it I would love love lover a Rumbelle wedding—unless it’s an Outlaw Queen wedding and then I really think I will melt into a little puddle:)
ME TOO KG!!! OUTLAW QUEEN AND WICKEDSISTERS!!!! This only builds up more excitement for these two happening!
[adrotate group="5"]"If you go as far as you can see...you will then see enough to go even further." - Finn Balor
RumplesGirl wrote: The March 9 episode will also incorporate the fact that real-life couple Ginnifer Goodwin and Josh Dallas (Snow and Charming) are expecting a child. The baby will have a connection to the impending progeny of Sleeping Beauty (Sarah Bolger) and Prince Phillip (Julian Morris), though producers promise there won’t be a soap opera-like baby switch.
So does this mean that Aurora doesn’t have twins?
i think so.
As for Frozen: that’s be interesting, but I have to see the movie. Guess I have a year?
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"We’ve been talking about this in chat so I’m going to throw it out there.
Is it possible this wedding is a hoax?
Cause think about it: why would they spoil the SEASON FINALE when all the other spoilers are from the episodes they’ve written/shot already. Nothing about what is beyond 315, which they are currently working on.
Why would you spoil the finale in January? When it isn’t even written?
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"RumplesGirl wrote: The March 9 episode will also incorporate the fact that real-life couple Ginnifer Goodwin and Josh Dallas (Snow and Charming) are expecting a child. The baby will have a connection to the impending progeny of Sleeping Beauty (Sarah Bolger) and Prince Phillip (Julian Morris), though producers promise there won’t be a soap opera-like baby switch.
So does this mean that Aurora doesn’t have twins?
i think so.
As for Frozen: that’s be interesting, but I have to see the movie. Guess I have a year?
I haven’t read though this entire thread, but the fact that Keck referred to Snow’s baby as “baby” and Aurora’s baby as “progeny” struck me as odd. So, I double checked, and sure enough, “progeny” can refer to one or multiple offspring. Aurora could be having twins.
I haven’t read though this entire thread, but the fact that Keck referred to Snow’s baby as “baby” and Aurora’s baby as “progeny” struck me as odd. So, I double checked, and sure enough, “progeny” can refer to one or multiple offspring. Aurora could be having twins.
Great catch. It’d be a nice call back to the original story.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"The original spoiler about growing by two spaces said taking into account Pan and a Snowing baby I believe, so it doesn’t automatically rule out this wedding somehow being tied into the family wreath.
I am wondering if maybe the connection between Philora’s kids and Snowing’s could be something in line with the Sleeping Beauty story, that is that a …shall we say.. Wicked fairy shows up to curse them instead of bless them like the fairy godmothers. What if that happens to Philora’s babies (I like the idea of them being twins named Anna and Elsa!) and so the only solution to the curse is to bless Snowings 2nd child to be another savior (let’s say its a boy called Kristoff). I don’t think they’d be that close on Frozen though.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
Cinders wrote: I haven’t read though this entire thread, but the fact that Keck referred to Snow’s baby as “baby” and Aurora’s baby as “progeny” struck me as odd. So, I double checked, and sure enough, “progeny” can refer to one or multiple offspring. Aurora could be having twins.
Great catch. It’d be a nice call back to the original story.
I don’t think they mean twins. I think when they say “impending progeny” they mean expectant offspring and they might be talking about having their baby on site with them and perhaps the connection is that the baby will play both Charmings & Aurora/Philip’s child OR maybe both babies will have some sort of curse put on them. WWW did use poppies to put Dorothy & company to sleep. Sounds a lot like Mal, doesn’t it? Sisters? Just another crack theory to throw into the pot. 🙂
Keeper of Pandora's Box & The Yellow Brick Road.
Please! No cursing babies! Prophecies about babies’ futures is cool. Cursing babies NOT cool.
And no to Aurora’s babies being from Frozen. I don’t want to wait till they grow up to see that story. I’d rather have new kids play the Frozen sisters next year
The interesting thing with using the characters from Frozen is that the film is pretty much an entirely different story than the original fairytale! It’s not even really a new take on the same story- it’s a whole alternate plot!
The interesting thing with using the characters from Frozen is that the film is pretty much an entirely different story than the original fairytale! It’s not even really a new take on the same story- it’s a whole alternate plot!
Am I only one who would want them to go original? I love Disney and all but it’s starting to feel like Once Upon a Disney. There are fairy tales and legends from all over the world without having to pull out what is newest and shiniest at the moment. It’s not surprising that ONCE is doing Oz with other big networks set to begin production on Oz dramas.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
The topic ‘Keck Exclusive: Season 3B (now up!)’ is closed to new replies.