Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Six › 6×01 “The Savior” › Morpheus
- This topic has 58 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 2 months ago by rainbow2.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 27, 2016 at 11:18 am #327800thedarkonedearieParticipant
Also theory thing fits, I even think some time ago they hinted that the prophecy could be mentioned again, wasn’t the prophecy saying that a boy would lead rumple to his son but that boy would be his undoing, or whatever was? So f they actually use that again, I may have to actual praise them for that, and at this point rumple dying, if that prediction is based on something real, is the only character I see going off. And if he dies at his son hand, is link to Star Wars and the theory on tumblr that Morpheus is like Kylo rhen. Also, maybe Morpheus is mr. gold first name and they said they have a specific time for belle to have the kid, means that probably btw winter finale and return may have a time jump.
I think all of this fits. There are reports that Robert Carlyle wants off the show. There was the prediction that a series regular would exit the show by the halfway point. A&E said we would see Morpheus again before it was revealed that it was their actual son. They also said that while there wouldn’t be a time jump to start the season, there could be later on. And then there’s the prophecy, which I have always said never really occurred in season 3a. All of this lends some strong evidence to the theory that Rumple will die around the midpoint of the season and the second half will be a time jump which will help with Henry’s aging but also age up their son to look like he did in Belle’s dream. And if the prophecy does come back into play and a “boy” leads him to his “son” but that boy will also be his “undoing,” then big props to the writers for having this planned all along.
[adrotate group="5"]September 27, 2016 at 11:48 am #327801rainbow2ParticipantAlso theory thing fits, I even think some time ago they hinted that the prophecy could be mentioned again, wasn’t the prophecy saying that a boy would lead rumple to his son but that boy would be his undoing, or whatever was? So f they actually use that again, I may have to actual praise them for that, and at this point rumple dying, if that prediction is based on something real, is the only character I see going off. And if he dies at his son hand, is link to Star Wars and the theory on tumblr that Morpheus is like Kylo rhen. Also, maybe Morpheus is mr. gold first name and they said they have a specific time for belle to have the kid, means that probably btw winter finale and return may have a time jump.
I think all of this fits. There are reports that Robert Carlyle wants off the show. There was the prediction that a series regular would exit the show by the halfway point. A&E said we would see Morpheus again before it was revealed that it was their actual son. They also said that while there wouldn’t be a time jump to start the season, there could be later on. And then there’s the prophecy, which I have always said never really occurred in season 3a. All of this lends some strong evidence to the theory that Rumple will die around the midpoint of the season and the second half will be a time jump which will help with Henry’s aging but also age up their son to look like he did in Belle’s dream. And if the prophecy does come back into play and a “boy” leads him to his “son” but that boy will also be his “undoing,” then big props to the writers for having this planned all along.
when I say time jump I mean months for the birth to happen, not years , bc with years that all regulars would have gone by now, replaced with middle age actors.
About the prophecy, I will not say they thought about this for now, bc they already said in the blu ray commentaries, that sometimes they mention things, move on, and later mentioned them again and they tell the fans that they planned which was not true, this was admitted by the writers. I think the prophecy was always meant to be about Henry, how we will never know, the thing is something changed closer to s3a finale that lead to all seasons of retcons, so I would praise them of bringing the prophecy to use, not by saying they always planed to use it for this, if rumple ends dying at the hand of his son or bc of his son.
September 27, 2016 at 11:54 am #327802thedarkonedearieParticipantAbout the prophecy, I will not say they thought about this for now, bc they already said in the blu ray commentaries, that sometimes they mention things, move on, and later mentioned them again and they tell the fans that they planned which was not true, this was admitted by the writers. I think the prophecy was always meant to be about Henry, how we will never know, the thing is something changed closer to s3a finale that lead to all seasons of retcons, so I would praise them of bringing the prophecy to use, not by saying they always planed to use it for this, if rumple ends dying at the hand of his son or bc of his son.
Idk though. If this is how the story plays out, it’s hard not to think they had this planned all along. And even if they didn’t, they deserve props for deciding to keep Rumple alive after 3a, and switch the narrative on how the prophecy plays out but still having it make sense based on what the Seer said. It would be harder to do that than just sticking with what they originally planned.
September 27, 2016 at 12:03 pm #327804PriceofMagicParticipantI’d be quite annoyed if Rumple misses out on being a father yet again. Why can’t RumBelle just be happy, are A&E allergic to the idea or something? They can’t even manage one episode. They could explore the reason WHY Rumple is so reluctant to give up power instead of just constantly casting him in a bad light because he’s not keen on giving up the thing that has protected him for years.
All magic comes with a price!
Keeper of FelixSeptember 27, 2016 at 12:05 pm #327805thedarkonedearieParticipantAs your bottom line quote says, “All magic comes with a price.” And his price for all the magic he’s used for evil, is his death.
September 27, 2016 at 12:09 pm #327806nevermoreParticipantThe only “evidence” against this theory is that it would be economically unwise when the new B&B is coming out in spring 2017. Killing Rumple off too early and aborting the OUAT_internal BB story might not jive well for promotional purposes for the new Disney product. And it means not capitalizing on the slice of the market/viewership potentially resulting from the film.
There’s $$$ to consider here, and as we’ve learned with the Frozen adaptation, OUAT keeps its eye on the prize.
September 27, 2016 at 12:17 pm #327807Bar FarerParticipantThe only “evidence” against this theory is that it would be economically unwise when the new B&B is coming out in spring 2017. Killing Rumple off too early and aborting the OUAT_internal BB story might not jive well for promotional purposes for the new Disney product. And it means not capitalizing on the slice of the market/viewership potentially resulting from the film. There’s $$$ to consider here, and as we’ve learned with the Frozen adaptation, OUAT keeps its eye on the prize.
Disney do not need and it has never needed OUAT to promote their products. It’s Beauty and the Beast, the Acadamy Award winner, best picture nominee and one of the most popular Disney films of all times. If it did’t need OUAT back then, it certainly doesn’t need it now.
It’s the other way, OUAT uses Disney franchises to get more ratings.
"All your questions are pointless"
September 27, 2016 at 12:17 pm #327808rainbow2ParticipantThe only “evidence” against this theory is that it would be economically unwise when the new B&B is coming out in spring 2017. Killing Rumple off too early and aborting the OUAT_internal BB story might not jive well for promotional purposes for the new Disney product. And it means not capitalizing on the slice of the market/viewership potentially resulting from the film. There’s $$$ to consider here, and as we’ve learned with the Frozen adaptation, OUAT keeps its eye on the prize.
yeah that was what I said a previous post, the Movie coming up on March 2017, killing rumple would go go against that promotion, of course they can’t do anything if Robert wants out,they can always say that, besides beauty and beast he has several other roles, I mean like belle get is simply belle, rumple is totally against canon story of B&B, bc he is part of other stories.
September 27, 2016 at 5:05 pm #327821shaunakParticipantI just need someone to explain why Morfetus could wake Belle with TLK in a dream world when Snow couldn’t wake Charming with TLK in the Burning Room in S2…
September 27, 2016 at 6:23 pm #327824Jiminy’s JournalParticipantI just need someone to explain why Morfetus could wake Belle with TLK in a dream world when Snow couldn’t wake Charming with TLK in the Burning Room in S2…
Because they were in the same world?
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘Morpheus’ is closed to new replies.