- This topic has 98 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 3 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I think it’s so silly that the writers have basically run out of ideas but that they chose to persist with the show rather than simply end it. They chose to re-set the show but with the same old memory-erasing curse and re-cast the same old Disney characters but with different actors. I get that it’s basically a parallel universe, but it seems really boring to me. Why go the route of Cinderella when there are still plenty of other fairy-tale characters, legends, and folklore to draw from? Why not make Tiana the main princess since we haven’t seen her? The writers could have introduced a Spanish or Russian fairy-tale or something new. They could have kept Violet as a new, original character or introduced someone else as Lucy’s mother. *sigh*
Completely agree. There is SO much untapped literary and Disney material to pull from. I don’t want a different Cinderella, or Red Riding Hood, or Peter Pan – they’re stories have already been established in the OUAT universe. Now people are going to be constantly comparing the new version of the character to the old.
They already have an in every single thing they prefer the original OUAT to the new OUAT. So epic fail on Adam and Eddy’s part.
People are now saying this is the Wal Mart OUAT.
[adrotate group="5"]The "blonde chick" is @jschramer, a beloved part of the Once family forever. There is >1 version Of Cinderella. New book!
— Jane Espenson (@JaneEspenson) July 16, 2017
Besides race, I wonder how this version of Cinderella will differ from our original. Maybe her stepsisters aren’t wicked; maybe her wicked stepmother is really a wicked stepfather.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Maybe her stepsisters aren’t wicked; maybe her wicked stepmother is really a wicked stepfather
Oh. Ooooooh!!!! Her wicked stepmother is the Lady Tremaine from WONDERLAND!!!!!! OOooh.
No, but seriously, her dress looks mildly similar to the one from the live action Disney movie. I wonder if that’s intentional. Not a lot like it, but similar. Hmm.
"I could have the giant duck as my steed!" --Daniel Radcliffe
Keeper Of Tamara's Taser , Jafar's Staff, Kitsis’s Glasses , Ariel’s Tail, Dopey's Hat , Peter Pan’s Shadow, Outfit, & Pied Cloak,Red Queen's Castle, White Rabbit's Power To World Hop, Zelena's BroomStick, & ALL MAGICOh. Ooooooh!!!! Her wicked stepmother is the Lady Tremaine from WONDERLAND!!!!!! OOooh.
No, but seriously, her dress looks mildly similar to the one from the live action Disney movie. I wonder if that’s intentional. Not a lot like it, but similar. Hmm.
Someone else already mentioned too, that maybe Ana is from this version of Cinderella. Bringing back her and Will as regulars would be awesome in my opinion, but overall this is just such a bizarre choice to me. Having Cinderella 2.0 is one one thing since we only saw the first one in 4 episodes, but are they going to have a new Snow, Rumple, Evil Queen, Wicked Witch, Cruella, Pan, etc? I just can’t see the audience going for that.
The problem is though that they have already done a Cinderella. This Cinderella needs to be different then the one they have already done, but she can’t be that different or she isn’t really Cinderella. It is just a weird choice.
I agree though, they cannot have a new Snow, Charming, and Evil Queen. It is one thing for a minor character, but not for those.
I agree though, they cannot have a new Snow, Charming, and Evil Queen. It is one thing for a minor character, but not for those.
I agree with this but I wonder how they go about explaining that in the universe.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"I agree though, they cannot have a new Snow, Charming, and Evil Queen. It is one thing for a minor character, but not for those.
I agree with this but I wonder how they go about explaining that in the universe.
Good point. I don’t know how they’re going to do all this.
The topic ‘OUAT at D23 2017 – Saturday, July 15th at 3:15pm (Pacific Time)’ is closed to new replies.