ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast

Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show

  • Home
  • Once Upon a Time
  • Wonderland
  • Forums
    • Recent posts
    • Recent posts (with spoilers)
  • Timeline
  • Live
  • Sponsor
    • Privacy Policy

OUAT at D23 2017 – Saturday, July 15th at 3:15pm (Pacific Time)

Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Seven › General S7 spoilers › OUAT at D23 2017 – Saturday, July 15th at 3:15pm (Pacific Time)

  • This topic has 98 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by thedarkonedearie.
Viewing 10 posts - 81 through 90 (of 99 total)
← 1 2 3 … 8 9 10 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 15, 2017 at 10:34 pm #340303
    hjbau
    Participant

    Another question that will be answered early will be whether Hook and Emma have a kid together. “[We’ll] answer that at the beginning of the season,” Kitsis confirmed.

    That seems to all but confirm that they do. The issue is time because none of the actresses cast so far can pull off a 14 yr old if CS had a baby right away or younger as is more likely the case. It’s the same reason why many of us believed none of the actresses could be baby Robyn.

    Quote

    Well even if they have a teenage baby two for Emma that doesn’t mean the actor has to actually be a teenager. There are a lot of 25 year old actors playing teenagers out there. I am not saying any of these actors are, but someone older could be playing younger.

    [adrotate group="5"]

    July 15, 2017 at 11:06 pm #340305
    RumplesGirl
    Keymaster

    I am not saying any of these actors are, but someone older could be playing younger.

    Oh to be sure. Adelaide Kane did just spend 4-5 yrs playing a 16-19yr old and she’s actually 26. So it’s possible, just maybe not with these recently announced ones since CS baby could only be 14 yrs at max.

    "He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
    July 15, 2017 at 11:14 pm #340306
    RumplesGirl
    Keymaster

    Kinda. All should become clearer soon. But yes, previous Ella still exists on the show.

    — Adam Horowitz (@AdamHorowitzLA) July 16, 2017

    "He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
    July 15, 2017 at 11:16 pm #340307
    TheWatcher
    Participant

    we’ll actually see different iterations of some of the characters we’ve come to know and love over the years.

    I’m…..kind of intrigued by this….. There are different versions of lots of stories told all across the world….hmmm… I’d love to see a more story accurate version of the little mermaid… Or even Snow White….. Maybe not Sleeping Beauty though.

    Having more Disney accurate versions of some characters (like Rapunzel) would be fun, but it would also be really cool to have darke versions of others aswell. But my biggest optimistic view about this:

    IT WILL HELP US SEE THIS SHOW AS SOEMTHING ENTIRELY SEPERATE AND DIFFERENT THAN THE PREVIOUS OUAT.

    If we have a new Cinderella, new snow white, new everyone, we can all just pretend this is a different show altogether.

    With Emma only being there in 1ep how will Hook act

    The fact they even decided to ask this question is lowkey hilarious. If Hook’s really a changed man, his actions shouldn’t be dependent on whether or not Emma is present. Same issue I have with Rumpel.

    they are soulmates and the Hook we know only has eyes for Emma

    Yeah, the Hook we know. This is a new, cursed, memory-less Hook. So he will have eyes for someone else? Great. I bet a thousand cookies Hook is gonna be written as ship-bait once more this season, falling for some woman is obviously a villain. Henry will have to convince him to leave her because his true love is really Emma, blah blah. Gah. I had hope for this guy this season.

    "I could have the giant duck as my steed!" --Daniel Radcliffe
    Keeper Of Tamara's Taser , Jafar's Staff, Kitsis’s Glasses , Ariel’s Tail, Dopey's Hat , Peter Pan’s Shadow, Outfit, & Pied Cloak,Red Queen's Castle, White Rabbit's Power To World Hop, Zelena's BroomStick, & ALL MAGIC

    July 16, 2017 at 2:00 am #340308
    Michael
    Blocked

    I don’t think Hook will fall for anybody at all. I think a person will try to flirt with him or something but he won’t do anything because a part of him knows it’s wrong. Similar to Charming from S1. I imagine Lucy will wake up Hook not Henry. Once Hook is awake I imagine his priority will be getting back to Emma and the cs child.

    July 16, 2017 at 5:46 am #340310
    Rainbow
    Participant

    I don’t think Hook will fall for anybody at all.

    well the thing is, if this is not original Hook, but another version, this HOOK may fall for 1000 women, bc in this version Emma means nothing to him.

    "I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".

    July 16, 2017 at 9:56 am #340313
    RumplesGirl
    Keymaster

    I imagine Lucy will wake up Hook not Henry.

    You mean through TLK with Henry?

    "He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
    July 16, 2017 at 10:25 am #340317
    Slurpeez
    Participant

    I think it’s so silly that the writers have basically run out of ideas but that they chose to persist with the show rather than simply end it. They chose to re-set the show but with the same old memory-erasing curse and re-cast the same old Disney characters but with different actors. I get that it’s basically a parallel universe, but it seems really boring to me. Why go the route of Cinderella when there are still plenty of other fairy-tale characters, legends, and folklore to draw from? Why not make Tiana the main princess since we haven’t seen her? The writers could have introduced a Spanish or Russian fairy-tale or something new. They could have kept Violet as a new, original character or introduced someone else as Lucy’s mother. *sigh*

    "That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy

    July 16, 2017 at 1:35 pm #340319
    ry4christ
    Participant

    I think it’s so silly that the writers have basically run out of ideas but that they chose to persist with the show rather than simply end it. They chose to re-set the show but with the same old memory-erasing curse and re-cast the same old Disney characters but with different actors. I get that it’s basically a parallel universe, but it seems really boring to me. Why go the route of Cinderella when there are still plenty of other fairy-tale characters, legends, and folklore to draw from? Why not make Tiana the main princess since we haven’t seen her? The writers could have introduced a Spanish or Russian fairy-tale or something new. They could have kept Violet as a new, original character or introduced someone else as Lucy’s mother. *sigh*

    Quote

    Completely agree. There is SO much untapped literary and Disney material to pull from. I don’t want a different Cinderella, or Red Riding Hood, or Peter Pan – their stories have already been established in the OUAT universe. Now people are going to be constantly comparing the new version of the character to the old.

    July 16, 2017 at 2:19 pm #340320
    Michael
    Blocked
    Michael wrote:

    I imagine Lucy will wake up Hook not Henry.

    You mean through TLK with Henry?

    Quote

    No through the same means Emma did in the finale. With the book, and probably the story of him and Emma.

    I imagine the same will be said for Regina and Rumple as well.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 81 through 90 (of 99 total)
← 1 2 3 … 8 9 10 →

The topic ‘OUAT at D23 2017 – Saturday, July 15th at 3:15pm (Pacific Time)’ is closed to new replies.

Design by Daniel J. Lewis | D.Joseph Design • Built on the Genesis Framework