- This topic has 131 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
@RumplesGirl wrote:
Yes, A and E have said there won’t be time travel and I think we need to remember that they need to keep it simple enough for the causal viewer to understand.
Yeah. More to the point, while the personality of pre-Milah’s death Hook resembles greatly Peter Pan’s, this take of Peter has him being this overlord so powerful, controlling an army fiercely devoted to him and having plans that spans centuries and involves other realms, that even Rumple fears him; that goes completely against the portrayal of Captain Hook we’ve been seeing, who Rumple finds so laughable as a threat that he even chose to use the cane of pain to deal with him instead of magic once..
[adrotate group="5"]Maybe I written it wrong, but Ii didn’t mean a time travel.
Century 1700: Hook was born and get lost, rescued by a fairy. Then his father searched for him, steal the magic beans from the darkOne. Found his son on Neverland, build a Jolly Roger, then runaway cause he was found. Goes to the enchanted forest were he start over and get Rumplestiltskin and has to flee again when he is a boy. Then returned to Neverland, found the way of the DarkOnes undoing, learned magic and searched since then for the boy “Henry”. On the 19th century he convinced Wendy to help him with the home office, that her family would be safe. In Neverland you didn’t grow old so he is still their and wants to get rid off the man who is always the reason why he has to lave his children.
Hook is not talking of Peter because it is a old part of him that was betrayed and he left the boy, who was so naive and get him the new name Killian Jones and start over that no one will ever fool him again. He don’t want that everybody knows him.
Also the leader of the last boys said to Hook: “If you find him, you know to whom he belongs to.” OK he was refering to Bae, but still he maked it clear that if he found any boy should be given to him and in the end he said also. “Peter Pan never fails.”, so it could be that he is reffering to Hook too.
I know it could also be the leader or HIM, but I still hope that PP is not the bad boy.Th really Problem in my idea is that i don’t know hoe the time i work in Neverland. Is it stuck, but if then Neal would be dead by now, cause if it doesn’t go further like the other realms he would be still in the 19th century.
Heros don't get their Happy Ending!
I don,t think Hook will be Peter I think Peter may be his son. After all Hook said the things we do for our kids and when he handed Bae over to the Lost Boys he said I hope this pleases him. Maybe that,s why Peter does not show his face in NL he does not want to face his Father. Also I think Peter may be Rumple,s secret apprentice 😮 who is also Hook,s son Rumple wanting to teach Bae about magic but Bae did not want to learn it. What if Hook had a son that Cora got from the black market and gave him to Rumple 😮 so Rumple teaches Peter about magic while Hook teaches Bae to hate magic. Also I think it would be cool if Bae and Peter was like brothers in NL then Henry could call Peter uncle Pete Henry needs a uncle fingue so why not Peter 😀
I kind of like your idea. Would that mean that hooks story were true, but he was the father not the child? trying to make it right with bae.
Heros don't get their Happy Ending!
What i,m saying is Rumple wanting a baby from Cora her baby but she tricked him but still she own him a baby so what if that baby was Peter 😮 who may be hook,s son maybe that,s why Pan,s shadow look like Hook because Peter is Hook,s son.
@batclaw wrote:
What i,m saying is Rumple wanting a baby from Cora her baby but she tricked him but still she own him a baby so what if that baby was Peter 😮 who may be hook,s son maybe that,s why Pan,s shadow look like Hook because Peter is Hook,s son.
Cora doesn’t not owe Rumple a baby anymore. He only said that she could give him his (Rumple’s) baby. He changed the contract when she wanted to run away with him.
I still think it’s possible that PP looks exactly like Henry so there actually wouldn’t be a casting call for PP. If they said that role didn’t need a casting call then that would be a big spoiler. Just my thought.
"We were happy."
"Because... it was born out of true love."While it is possible that they’ll just double cast Jared to play Peter Pan, if they intend him to look identical to Henry, but I would rather they cast someone new.
I agree we need someone new to play Peter Pan I also hope they get a grown up Peter Pan not a kid because if he is the one Greg and Tamara is working for we need a grown up Peter Pan.Also I have this feeling Peter Pan and Blue may be dating in secret 😮 Peter can come and go from NL to Storybrooke whenever he wants so maybe he is meeting Blue in Storybrooke in secret he could be the one who gave her a wand since she said she lost her wand maybe that,s why she had a wand in the cricket game he went to the town and met her in secret and gave her a back up wand to use. Watch in one of the episodes for season 3 it will show Blue in Storybrooke then a guy will walk up to her and ask her he need,s help then she ask with what then he will say help me find my shadow then she will say of course I will then the guy who is Peter Pan will say that,s my Tinkerbell then they start kissing 😀 fades to black screen 😮
If they wanted to cast an older actor who appears childish enough to be Peter Pan, I was considering maybe Andrew Rannells (Elder Price in “The Book of Mormon” and Bryan Collins in “The New Normal”). I definitely think he has a Peter Pan look to him, and he has a rather high pitched voice that could fit the part. Also helps that since “The New Normal” got cancelled, Andrew should theoretically be free for work.
Here’s a video of his Tony Awards performance to get an idea of him in motion, and to listen to his voice:
The topic ‘Peter Pan Confirmed To Be Played by a New Male Actor’ is closed to new replies.