Peter Pan – new clue?

[gypsy]

I think we will actually see Peter Pan.
He’s Adam’s favorite character.

K&H said in a past interview, that they weren’t able to get the rights to PP, so, Hook was on their shelf.
Given the fact that Hook has now made an appearance, and in a more recent interview, K&H said there’s a chance we’ll be seeing PP, so, I’m thinking they gained the rights.

[oncewatcher]

You may be right, because I don’t see how they could have used Captain Hook either, if they didn’t have the rights to Peter Pan. Then again, his name is Killian Jones, not “James Hook” as is canon. So either they have the rights now to Peter Pan, or they’re daring to graze the borderline for what is legal. If they can’t literally use “Peter Pan”, I think a character will probably be like Peter Pan — I think he will be at least, Peter-esque. Peter Pan will still be included into all this, in some way. It could be Neal, or I really love the idea of Hook being both Peter, and Captain Hook. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

That new clue is definitely interesting, but from what I saw from K&H in “Lost”, they do sometimes throw stuff out there (viral techniques) to throw the viewer off scent (I think that might be something they learned from JJ Abrams,. A lot of stuff like that was used in marketing his first Star Trek movie). I do not believe that was by accident, but whether or not it’s any indication of anything, it does keep things interesting.

[fairy dust]

@Oncewatcher wrote:

You may be right, because I don’t see how they could have used Captain Hook either, if they didn’t have the rights to Peter Pan. Then again, his name is Killian Jones, not “James Hook” as is canon. So either they have the rights now to Peter Pan, or they’re daring to graze the borderline for what is legal. If they can’t literally use “Peter Pan”, I think a character will probably be like Peter Pan — I think he will be at least, Peter-esque. Peter Pan will still be included into all this, in some way. It could be Neal, or I really love the idea of Hook being both Peter, and Captain Hook. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

That new clue is definitely interesting, but from what I saw from K&H in “Lost”, they do sometimes throw stuff out there (viral techniques) to throw the viewer off scent (I think that might be something they learned from JJ Abrams,. A lot of stuff like that was used in marketing his first Star Trek movie). I do not believe that was by accident, but whether or not it’s any indication of anything, it does keep things interesting.

I absolutely love JJ Abrams…and the Star Trek movie was such an incredible blending of old and new…with the brilliant twist of rewriting the entire timeline in a way that fans accepted.

[Phee]

@Oncewatcher wrote:

You may be right, because I don’t see how they could have used Captain Hook either, if they didn’t have the rights to Peter Pan. Then again, his name is Killian Jones, not “James Hook” as is canon. So either they have the rights now to Peter Pan, or they’re daring to graze the borderline for what is legal.

They’ve used the names Hook and Smee, and have mentioned Neverland by name. Think it’s safe to say they now have the rights to anything and everything Pan related.

[oncewatcher]

Yeah, it seems like they would already be in pretty deep trouble if they didn’t have the rights.

[maiqu20]

I still say Hook is a grown up Peter Pan..

and maybe the Hook we know is not the real Hook

[abowlingball]

Pretty sure we all seen this stuff in another one of fairy’s post about underground clues. Why the need to keep repeating themselves. I dunno.

[Author]

Posts