Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Two › 2×16 "The Miller’s Daughter" › Spoilers for 2×16
- This topic has 101 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 8 months ago by MysteryKat25.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 21, 2013 at 4:51 pm #136048SlurpeezParticipant
From E!Online:
Thomas: I’ll take some Once Upon a Time spoilers!
In the March 10 episode “The Miller’s Daughter,” Rose McGowan kills it as a young Cora and we get to see how Regina’s evil mother became the power-hungry person she is today. We’ll also see her first meeting with Rumpelstiltskin, which is, in a word, seductive http://www.eonline.com/news/390148/spoiler-chat-scoop-on-revenge-community-hart-of-dixie-once-upon-a-time-and-moreFrom Entertainment Weekly:
We saw Cora kiss Rumple in In the Name of the Brother, so we knew there was a romantic history there. I can’t wait to see the rivalry between the two of them. Cora is the only one we’ve seen cunning enough to take on the Dark One with his own tactics of manipulation.
[adrotate group="5"]"That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
February 21, 2013 at 5:10 pm #174663PheeParticipantThat dress looks fabulous.
February 21, 2013 at 5:18 pm #174666ser_dragonParticipant*Read the last line. Read it again. Freak out*
Please writers, please please please If it must be done OK, I can stand the Cora/Rumpel (see what I’ve done here?) But please for the love of all that this holly, please please No Regina= Rumpel daughter. Don’t, please seriously don’t.
Please it’s going too far. Really too far.
Too far for me at last.
February 21, 2013 at 6:20 pm #174674RumplesGirlKeymasterIf Regina is Rumple’s daughter, I’m going to have a fit.
Also, Cora is supposed to be the Miller’s Daughter..what is that dress?! Humble beginning, remember!
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"February 21, 2013 at 6:24 pm #174675PheeParticipant@RumplesGirl wrote:
Also, Cora is supposed to be the Miller’s Daughter..what is that dress?! Humble beginning, remember!
I thought that at first too, but if you look at the little bit of the set behind them, it looks like a humble dwelling, so I’m thinking perhaps he magic-ed her into that fancy dress, like he did with Cinderella, to give her a taste of what he could offer her. That could well be what the “seductiveness” in the scene is all about, not that he’s seducing her romantically.
February 21, 2013 at 7:44 pm #174691antbeeParticipant@Ser_Dragon wrote:
*Read the last line. Read it again. Freak out*
Please writers, please please please If it must be done OK, I can stand the Cora/Rumpel (see what I’ve done here?) But please for the love of all that this holly, please please No Regina= Rumpel daughter. Don’t, please seriously don’t.
Please it’s going too far. Really too far.
Too far for me at last.
If Regina is Rumple’s daughter, I’m going to have a fit.
This. While I don’t mind everyone being connected to each other already like they are, it does seem overkill imo to make Regina not only Snow’s step mother and adopted mother to Henry but also biological daughter of Rumple and half sister to Nealfire. It’s enough that they’re already connected through Henry without going overboard, and this is coming from someone who really wanted Neal to be Baelfire.
Mostly though, I don’t like the idea because of the relationship that Rumple and Regina have. It would be one thing if they were just frenemies with no sexual undertones at all, and Rumple had to deal with the fact that while trying to find one biological child, he ended up destroying another especially if it came out that maybe Nealfire isn’t really Rumple’s biological child. While I think in normal circumstances, it would be interesting to have a story line along those lines, for OUaT, I think it would be crossing a line since I don’t want to think about how disturbing it is that Rumple and Regina have this sexual chemistry between them, and we find out that they’re really father and daughter. I know the original fairy tales are dark and that they’ve had dark issues/scenes on the show before, but I don’t really want quasi-incest on this show at all.
February 21, 2013 at 8:42 pm #174707beastwhispererParticipant@Phee wrote:
@RumplesGirl wrote:
Also, Cora is supposed to be the Miller’s Daughter..what is that dress?! Humble beginning, remember!
I thought that at first too, but if you look at the little bit of the set behind them, it looks like a humble dwelling, so I’m thinking perhaps he magic-ed her into that fancy dress, like he did with Cinderella, to give her a taste of what he could offer her. That could well be what the “seductiveness” in the scene is all about, not that he’s seducing her romantically.
She’s holding a long contract and quill pen, so the comparison to Cinderella really resonates with what I’m seeing.
Totally agree with not wanting any father/daughter connection between Rumple and Regina. That would have multiple levels of creepy for me. Definitely too far.
February 21, 2013 at 9:28 pm #174723tiara_roseParticipantIf Regina is Rumples daughter. Henry would be to her: Adoptive son, step great-grandson and her nephew. 😆
Heros don't get their Happy Ending!
February 21, 2013 at 9:47 pm #174727MatthewPaulModeratorWhile I personally don’t want Rumple to end up being Regina’s biological father for all of the reasons stated above, I still wouldn’t put it past the writers to do this. They seem to love making everything twisted and complicated.
February 21, 2013 at 10:00 pm #174730hooks spyglassParticipantI would love to see it twisted around so that Cora doesn’t even want baby Regina at all & Rumple has to trick Cora into keeping her. I have no idea how it could fit/work but it would be a cool twist IMO
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘Spoilers for 2×16’ is closed to new replies.