Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Five › 5×07 “Nimue” › Timeline Of The Dark One
- This topic has 31 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Keb.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 9, 2015 at 7:32 pm #312068Heart of DarknessParticipant
Oh gosh, the hat. Yes, we’ve never gotten a proper explanation for the hat/dagger connection.
I think it was just that the cleaving ritual needed a ton of magic, and the hat was needed to collect it all.
As for why the hat was made… Perhaps Merlin intended to use it to remove the dark magic from Nimue’s heart like was done with Rumple. Problem is that unlike Excalibur, the hat can’t actually destroy the darkness nor even store it, so it’ll go around causing havoc unless tethered to a human again.
[adrotate group="5"]November 9, 2015 at 7:34 pm #312070Jiminy’s JournalParticipantMy guess? The people doing the captions aren’t the writers. Or writers cannot do math.
Oh gosh, the hat. Yes, we’ve never gotten a proper explanation for the hat/dagger connection.
I think it was just that the cleaving ritual needed a ton of magic, and the hat was needed to collect it all.
As for why the hat was made… Perhaps Merlin intended to use it to remove the dark magic from Nimue’s heart like was done with Rumple. Problem is that unlike Excalibur, the hat can’t actually destroy the darkness nor even store it, so it’ll go around causing havoc unless tethered to a human again.
We need to cleave Merlin from the sword.
November 9, 2015 at 7:42 pm #312074RumplesGirlKeymasterAs for how long Rumple was the dark one, based on several pieces of evidence, I have his becoming the Dark One in 1860. Yes, yes, I KNOW that’s not 300 years. Guess what? They play fast and loose with the timeline a LOT
1000 years before the age of Arthur is roughly 500 B.C.
Guess what wasn’t around in 500 BC?
If you said either Jesus or the Holy Grail, you are correct.
Fast and loose is one thing. This is bizzaro world where down is up and up is down.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"November 9, 2015 at 8:13 pm #312083Jiminy’s JournalParticipantAs for how long Rumple was the dark one, based on several pieces of evidence, I have his becoming the Dark One in 1860. Yes, yes, I KNOW that’s not 300 years. Guess what? They play fast and loose with the timeline a LOT
1000 years before the age of Arthur is roughly 500 B.C.
Guess what wasn’t around in 500 BC?
If you said either Jesus or the Holy Grail, you are correct.
Fast and loose is one thing. This is bizzaro world where down is up and up is down.
If you ask me, these captions have made the timeline more confusing.
November 9, 2015 at 8:46 pm #312089MatthewPaulModerator1000 years before the age of Arthur is roughly 500 B.C.
Guess what wasn’t around in 500 BC?
If you said either Jesus or the Holy Grail, you are correct.
Fast and loose is one thing. This is bizzaro world where down is up and up is down.
Here’s something about the Holy Grail that needs to be considered. They never outright said it was the same Holy Grail that Jesus apparently drank from. I mean, Merlin said it was from “the Gods”, implying that this particular Holy Grail wasn’t even given by a monotheistic God that Christianity is known for. So this could be an alternate unique interpretation of the Holy Grail that exists specifically in FTL, and is not the same as the traditional Holy Grail as we know it. In fact, they combined the Holy Grail with the concept of Elixir of Life from other stories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elixir_of_life. This grail could be from the Gods of Greek mythology for all we know, given all the ties to it this Season.
November 9, 2015 at 9:00 pm #312090RumplesGirlKeymasterHere’s something about the Holy Grail that needs to be considered. They never outright said it was the same Holy Grail that Jesus apparently drank from. I mean, Merlin said it was from “the Gods”, implying that this particular Holy Grail wasn’t even given by a monotheistic God that Christianity is known for. So this could be an alternate unique interpretation of the Holy Grail that exists specifically in FTL, and is not the same as the traditional Holy Grail as we know it. In fact, they combined the Holy Grail with the concept of Elixir of Life from other stories: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elixir_of_life. This grail could be from the Gods of Greek mythology for all we know, given all the ties to it this Season.
I said this in the fav/least fav threads: it’s a cup, with crosses, in Arthurian mythology/with Arthurian characters, and being called The Holy Grail. All that combined means it’s the Holy Grail. There aren’t multiple Holy Grails. It’s a unique item. They aren’t making a unique interpretation; they are taking VAST liberties with a relic in order to force it into the narrative because everyone knows that the Grail is *the* quest object in Arthurian mythology.
If they wanted just some Greek/polytheistic relic to bestow immortality, have Merlin drink some Ambrosia/Nectar from an sort of cup. Easy peasy. We know Greek gods exist in this world. We’ve established that and it’s a nice way to combine the Arthurian mythology and Greek myth, which we’ve been doing all season and is what you’re actually suggesting they are doing here–except for the the object, the narrative, and the situations reads otherwise.
Having THE Holy Grail (whatever “unique interpretation” you want to fan wank, it was very clearly supposed to be THE Grail) is super problematic because it raises so many FREAKING questions and issues. I have no problem with there being a magical cup in OUAT and, more specifically, in Arthurian mythology, but to call it THE Holy Grail is incredibly problematic because it suggests that Jesus existed in and had the same influence on the Enchanted Forest as he did in our very real world.
Christianity is not sui generis; it did not form in a vacuum completely devoid of outside forces and therefore could equally form in another universe. What outside forces you ask? Judaism, for one. Polytheism for another. History between those two forces, for a third. All of that (and so much more) led to the rise of apocalyptic Judaism and, eventually, to a preacher named Jesus who roamed around ancient Galilee, trying to tell people that times were ending. This is to say nothing of the apostle Paul who is responsible for Christianity going out to the Gentiles where it really took root (Jewish-Christianity fading away as the city of Jerusalem burned). If any of that–Judaism, Greco-Roman culture, the interaction between the two, and Paul–happened in the Enchanted Forest, then we’ve never seen it nor heard of it. And, like I keep saying, Jesus was not a realm jumper.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"November 9, 2015 at 10:18 pm #312100MatthewPaulModeratorI said this in the fav/least fav threads: it’s a cup, with crosses, in Arthurian mythology/with Arthurian characters, and being called The Holy Grail. All that combined means it’s the Holy Grail. There aren’t multiple Holy Grails. It’s a unique item. They aren’t making a unique interpretation; they are taking VAST liberties with a relic in order to force it into the narrative because everyone knows that the Grail is *the* quest object in Arthurian mythology.
If they wanted just some Greek/polytheistic relic to bestow immortality, have Merlin drink some Ambrosia/Nectar from an sort of cup. Easy peasy. We know Greek gods exist in this world. We’ve established that and it’s a nice way to combine the Arthurian mythology and Greek myth, which we’ve been doing all season and is what you’re actually suggesting they are doing here–except for the the object, the narrative, and the situations reads.
Having THE Holy Grail (whatever “unique interpretation” you want to fan wank, it was very clearly supposed to be THE Grail) is super problematic because it raises so many FREAKING questions and issues. I have no problem with there being a magical cup in OUAT and, more specifically, in Arthurian mythology, but to call it THE Holy Grail is incredibly problematic because it suggests that Jesus existed in and had the same influence on the Enchanted Forest as he did in our very real world.
Christianity is not sui generis; it did not form in a vacuum completely devoid of outside forces and therefore could equally form in another universe. What outside forces you ask? Judaism, for one. Polytheism for another. History between those two forces, for a third. All of that (and so much more) led to the rise of apocalyptic Judaism and, eventually, to a preacher named Jesus who roamed around ancient Galilee, trying to tell people that times were ending. This is to say nothing of the apostle Paul who is responsible for Christianity going out to the Gentiles where it really took root (Jewish-Christianity fading away as the city of Jerusalem burned). If any of that–Judaism, Greco-Roman culture, the interaction between the two, and Paul–happened in the Enchanted Forest, then we’ve never seen it nor heard of it. And, like I keep saying, Jesus was not a realm jumper.
I think this goes into the further complicated question of why FTL and these other realms exist at all in the OUAT universe. Why were the events of these realms unfolding many years after our own versions of the stories were written? Why did the Darlings live in the real Land Without Magic London instead of one of the “Fictional Londons”? Why are historical characters like Blackbeard in FTL? Mulan and Robin Hood are considered legends that could be based on real historical people, but there’s no doubt that Blackbeard (Edward Teach) was a very real person. Why do these realms just so happen to share the same spoken languages that exist in our world? Just like you mentioned with religion, each language “did not form in a vacuum completely devoid of outside forces.”
It’s probably way too deep for this show to ever explore, when the real world continues to question and debate the meaning of life. The closest answer we’ll likely ever get was when Isaac talked about these worlds as simply “realms of storytelling.” We’re both thinking deeper about this than the writers clearly are. *head explodes*
November 9, 2015 at 10:23 pm #312102RumplesGirlKeymasterWe’re both thinking deeper about this than the writers clearly are. *head explodes*
We are literally going to leave it there cause we agree and that’s clearly what it boils down to. 🙂
@Keb, godspeed to you on this one. I agree that there’s a typo on screen for 200 (be nice if Adam would admit it), but after that I’m going to have a hard time turning off my brain/educational background/ training in order to agree with anything you come up with for this one. So. Godspeed."He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"November 9, 2015 at 11:23 pm #312108KebParticipantThank you. I’ll do my best when I get this far.
Keeper of Belle's Gold magic, sand dollar, cloaks, purple FTL outfit, spell scroll, library key, copy of Romeo and Juliet, and cry-muffling pillow, Rumple's doll, overcoat, and strength, and The Timeline. My spreadsheet: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6r8CySCCWd9R0RUNm4xR3RhMEU/view?usp=sharing
November 10, 2015 at 12:32 pm #312139PowellfamilyParticipantMy problem is that even if the 200/500 year thing is a typo, Hook and Merlin clearly said that Merlin was in the tree for 1000 years.
500 years (200 year typo) is not a millennia.
Merlin should have drunk from the Grail around 1500 years ago, IMO.
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘Timeline Of The Dark One’ is closed to new replies.