- This topic has 42 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Sigh, nothing on Gold. As to Belle, it sounds like Lumiere was not the Beast’s friend, but hers……..,doesn’t sound like he has much to do with Rumbelle (even though the whiteboard was in purple writing, indicating Belle finds Lumiere/Candle – probably in the castle.
Of course maybe I’m misinterpreting……maybe this means Lumiere/Lawrence helps her out with Rumple? Nah, that doesn’t make any sense……….I wonder if there will be any Rumbelle at all in #15, Quiet Minds.
[adrotate group="5"]How many times do we have to explain that of course there isn’t going to be anything on Rumple because ABC would murder anyone that gives out any spoilers even hinting that he’s alive?!?! Honestly, It’s getting rather annoying when I read people whinging about no Rumple spoilers.
Horowitz: We’re answering your question with more questions. It’s not why Hook, but how Hook and when Hook? What does it mean? That’s something that we get to, again, pretty quickly.
Well I’m glad it’s cleared up quickly because that sentence just gave me a headache. Say what?
Kitsis: He’s an integral part of two characters’ lives.
Would they classify Henry as the second person, or is that too obvious, because if the guy knows Emma then duh of course he also knows Henry.
He could also be connected to WW through an Oz-ish connection. I’m still not sold on him being the Wizard though.
Kitsis: You know Regina. How do you think Regina will handle someone sitting in her chair looking through her stuff?
Horowitz: And eating her porridge?WW’s name will be Goldilocks? 😛 (Yes, I know Goldie was someone else in the Good Morning SB bit, I’m just joking.)
and Ariel
This was my highlight of the whole article. Been hoping we’d see her again!! 😀
Lumiere (Henri Lubatti) is one of our favorite characters. He’s really fun and interesting.
Horowitz: It’s a slightly different take than what you might expect from the movie. Alas, Jerry Orbach is not with us so we couldn’t bring him aboard to do it, but we have a take on the character that we think is fun. It’s fun to see him interact with BelleThis seems to confirm that Lumiere was a part of Belle’s household, not Rumple’s?
How many times do we have to explain that of course there isn’t going to be anything on Rumple because ABC would murder anyone that gives out any spoilers even hinting that he’s alive?!?! Honestly, It’s getting rather annoying when I read people whinging about no Rumbelle spoilers.
Um, DON’T speak to me like a child. I have NO idea who you are, you’re a total stranger to me – don’t talk down to me. If you’re annoyed or pissed off, that’s YOU’RE problem.
Sigh, nothing on Gold. As to Belle, it sounds like Lumiere was not the Beast’s friend, but hers……..,doesn’t sound like he has much to do with Rumbelle (even though the whiteboard was in purple writing, indicating Belle finds Lumiere/Candle – probably in the castle. Of course maybe I’m misinterpreting……maybe this means Lumiere/Lawrence helps her out with Rumple? Nah, that doesn’t make any sense……….I wonder if there will be any Rumbelle at all in #15, Quiet Minds.
They aren’t going to spoil anything on Rumple. Per 3×11 everyone thinks he is dead. Talking about him is a big red sign : “NOT DEAD!” We may know he’s not cause we’re smart that way, but A and E have to act like he really is dead.
This seems to confirm that Lumiere was a part of Belle’s household, not Rumple’s?
I think so. So, Belle pre-Skin Deep. Interesting. I wonder if Emilie is actually playing that version or if it’s really young Belle.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"I can’t see Lumiere being part of Belle’s life pre-Rumple. It sounds like she finds the candle……..why would Lumiere/Lawrence be in her own household/castle? Maybe she finds him in the Dark Castle in the missing year? Of course, I have no idea how he’d then turn back into a human, lol.
As to Gold, they’re not acting as if he’s dead. What about this?
“Keep watching…. The fate of Rumple and Belle is something that’s going to be explored. There’s plenty of story we have in mind for Belle, that we hope the audience likes. Emilie [de Ravin] is fantastic, doing some of her best work that we’ve ever seen.”
Loved the spoilers. Thank you it isn’t why Hook came BUT when and how.
I think this goes along with that scene they shot in the EF with all the fairy tale characters and Hook on the horse. Probably that’s when he foes as per how well, maybe some fairy dust along with some other things he used to transcend the realms to get to her.
Why Hook though, well I guess that’s gonna be answered in a flashback as well.
I also loved what he said about things never being easy with Emma. It’s okay though because Hook loves a challenge and he does succeed in the end. Hence the hug and the fact that he, Emma, and Henry get in the bug. Emma would not put Henry in the vicinity of a stranger if she did not remember him. So the lengths that Hook goes to get Emma to believe is probably gonna be interesting.
Called Gorham’s character being connected to Rapunzel, it added up with filming.
There IS a wedding coming up and a baby obviously.
All good spoilers.
he only issue I have with Lumiere being a part of Belle’s household is this. It sounds like she finds the candle……..why would Lumiere/Lawrence be in her own household/castle? Maybe she finds him in the Dark Castle in the missing year? Of course, I have no idea how he’d then turn back into a human, lol
We don’t know what the whole board says. It could be “Belle Find Staircase…Candle, Lumiere”
It’s possible that thee is a whole sentence written there and that the “candle” part starts a whole new sentence/thought.
Also, to the Rumbelle spoiler TVLine gave: different writers, different questions, different agendas.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Called Gorham’s character being connected to Rapunzel, it added up with filming
How? He wasn’t on set for 314.
Also, as to the Hook questions. Yes, the WHY isn’t important. It’s obvious : because Emma’s family is in danger. Someone had to get Emma. The bigger question is not WHY but WHY NOT someone else. The WHY is easy.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"hookian wrote: Called Gorham’s character being connected to Rapunzel, it added up with filming
How? He wasn’t on set for 314.
He was on set the same day they were filming sequences with Rapunzel. So I do think he’s indeed connected to her. There was a past tweet that did not specify whom was on set just that there was a new person and it was during the Rapunzel episode. A couple days later they said Gorham was filming with many people including Rapunzel.
The topic ‘TVGuide Spoilers Jan 19: S3B’ is closed to new replies.