ONCE - Once Upon a Time podcast

Reviews, theories, and talk about ABC's Once Upon a Time TV show

  • Home
  • Once Upon a Time
  • Wonderland
  • Forums
    • Recent posts
    • Recent posts (with spoilers)
  • Timeline
  • Live
  • Sponsor
    • Privacy Policy

TVGuide Spoilers Jan 19: S3B

Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Three › General S3 spoilers › TVGuide Spoilers Jan 19: S3B

  • This topic has 42 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by kfchimera.
Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 43 total)
← 1 2 3 4 5 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 20, 2014 at 12:51 am #238658
    HappyEndings
    Spectator

    There’s a possibility for a Snow and Charming baby. So Goodwin’s pregnancy is being written in?
    Kitsis: We definitely hinted that she wanted to have another child. They’re certainly going to try.
    Horowitz: We’ll deal with the realities of her pregnancy, but how we do it, we’re not ready to share. When you saw Snow saw her secret about that, it was well before we knew Ginny was pregnant. We’re telling the story that we’ve been setting up since the beginning of the season.
    Kitsis: But you know, every time Snow White gets pregnant, hell gets unleashed.
    Horowitz: Pregnancies tend to attract some chaos.

    What can you tease about the wedding?
    Kitsis: Yes, there may be a wedding, a birth and a lot of things.
    Horowitz: We’re not ready to send the save the dates out yet, but we can possibly expect some nuptials.

    Well gee wiz Snow and David can’t when each time they have a child something happens.

    The birth is Snows and Aurora’s babies, the wedding still betting on Emma. Ariel and Eric aren’t that important characters.

    I wish they would have explain what Emma was holding in her hands.

    [adrotate group="5"]

    January 20, 2014 at 12:57 am #238659
    Phee
    Participant

    I really, really hope that the Belle/Lumiere story involves a pre-Rumple Belle. I’d love to learn more about her past.

    It would be great to get an ep where all the flashbacks are 100% Belle centric, no Rumple involved. Would be a good opportunity to build up her character in her own right. Would still have Rumbelle stuff in present day because it’s impossible to show Belle in present day without Rumple being involved/referenced in some way, but the flashbacks just being all about her would be wonderful.

    January 20, 2014 at 1:10 am #238660
    HappyEndings
    Spectator

    Love this exactly many words but we got nothing.

    Geez. Never have two men used so many words to say so little.

    The only thing I got from that is that Hook possibly returns to find Emma from a time that is different than what has elapsed in New York. Unless they forgot about mentioning the time jump in the mid season finale which is entirely possible.

    Emma might not have memories, but she still has magic. Could she stumble upon that?
    Kitsis: We did see her drive out of town, so there’s no magic on that side. She is strong, but if we remember in Season 1, you have to believe in magic to see it.

    No magic on the other side but what happened at Henry’s birth with the lights? Didn’t Emma help Rumple at the airport? How did Emma get the apt after she left SB in NY?

    January 20, 2014 at 1:17 am #238661
    angiebelle
    Participant

    angiebelle wrote: I really, really hope that the Belle/Lumiere story involves a pre-Rumple Belle. I’d love to learn more about her past.

    It would be great to get an ep where all the flashbacks are 100% Belle centric, no Rumple involved. Would be a good opportunity to build up her character in her own right. Would still have Rumbelle stuff in present day because it’s impossible to show Belle in present day without Rumple being involved/referenced in some way, but the flashbacks just being all about her would be wonderful.

    Absolutely! So many fans are complaining that we’ve only seen her in relation to Rumple.  It would be so lovely to see her emerge as her own character. Only then will she had the opportunity to move into the front lines of the story arc. The flashbacks could show us who she was before…how she became the woman we met in Skin Deep.

    January 20, 2014 at 3:04 am #238678
    Cinders
    Participant

    Kitsis: We’re still going to get to see Tink (Rose McIver) again and Ariel (JoAnna Garcia Swisher) and some of the people we met in the first half of the season as well. Lumiere (Henri Lubatti) is one of our favorite characters. He’s really fun and interesting.

    I’m wondering who Kitsis is referring to when he says “and some of the people we met in the first half of the season”. Peter Pan? The Darlings?

    January 20, 2014 at 3:48 am #238680
    Phee
    Participant

    I’m wondering who Kitsis is referring to when he says “and some of the people we met in the first half of the season”. Peter Pan? The Darlings?

    Aren’t many other people he could be referring to, and I’d expect to see at least Pan if there’s a Hook or Tink centric in S3B. Guess Liam could come back if a Hook centric flashes back to pre-Good Form, (or maybe Liam’s undead, Davy Jones style, just give us a freaking Davy Jones connection already). If Ariel’s coming back, then Eric’s a given.

    January 20, 2014 at 8:31 am #238716
    RumplesGirl
    Keymaster

    I’m wondering who Kitsis is referring to when he says “and some of the people we met in the first half of the season”. Peter Pan? The Darlings?

    Totally missed that the first time around. I’d say Eric to go with Ariel; maybe PP if we get another Hook flashback. Other random lost boys (seriously…where are they???)

    "He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
    January 20, 2014 at 8:49 am #238719
    hookian
    Blocked

    So I read it all again and I loved that he said the question is not why Hook. It’s how Hook, and when Hook.

    Personally I believe this is in reference to the scene with Hook on the horse and no one else and I think that’s the scene where they decide he’s the one that’s gonna go. It’s not because Neal is injured because Neal looks perfectly fine in that sequence. That’s why they say it’s gonna be quickly revealed.

    Another reason why it’s Hook, he loves her.  It’s why he clearly looks as happy as he does the first time after he hasn’t seen her in a year, showing that he really did think of her every day. If this was lust, desire, or an infatuation, he didn’t see her for a year that’s plenty of time to move on. I’m NOT saying that Neal does not love her either.

    Hook goes in the name of her family but also he goes because he loves her. He tried TLK on her that should say without a shadow of a doubt the severity of his feelings for her and his year away from her.

    As for why Neal is not the one to go well I think that goes along with the Charmings finding out what he did to Emma in the past and it probably would not end up well for Neal if he was to go. A kick in the nuts from Emma would probably be the least of his worries.

     

    January 20, 2014 at 10:08 am #238736
    HappyEndings
    Spectator

    Totally missed that the first time around. I’d say Eric to go with Ariel; maybe PP if we get another Hook flashback. Other random lost boys (seriously…where are they???)

    I am wondering if this is just for the wedding.

    January 20, 2014 at 10:10 am #238737
    RumplesGirl
    Keymaster

    RumplesGirl wrote: Totally missed that the first time around. I’d say Eric to go with Ariel; maybe PP if we get another Hook flashback. Other random lost boys (seriously…where are they???)

    I am wondering if this is just for the wedding.

    I think so. Weddings tend to be large affairs where you’ll have the whole cast/town present. I’d say we see a lot o minor characters at the wedding.

    My fear is that they’ll bring back Red just for the wedding and have her standing in the crowd so that she’s present but not actually doing anything.

    "He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 31 through 40 (of 43 total)
← 1 2 3 4 5 →

The topic ‘TVGuide Spoilers Jan 19: S3B’ is closed to new replies.

Design by Daniel J. Lewis | D.Joseph Design • Built on the Genesis Framework