- This topic has 329 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
betsypaige24 wrote: Pretty sure Belle is safe – Em wouldn’t be doing this if she were being fired
Emilie de Ravin @emiliederavin<#oncers I’m so looking forward 2 #FairyTalesII convention! Paris-June 21st&22nd hope 2 see u there! http://www.xivents.com #ouat #belles
No, but she’d still do it if she chose to leave in order to keep up appearances. Actors who work sporadically on ONCE go to the cons all the time–Eion, Keegen, Anders, Sarah Bolger, ect I wouldn’t put much stock into anyone’s schedule or “where are they now” because we’ll go nuts.
I don’t think she’d confirm it…..why bother? I mean, we already know she was going. Also, those actors you referenced are all recurring, they’re not regulars. I think if I were being fired (I don’t believe this big death is related to an unhappy actor), I would not be promoting the show or even going out of my way to appear as if I were promoting it. Even if she were leaving, Em wouldn’t have to say a word; if she never said a word, fans would still know she was making that appearance. There’d be no need to confirm.
I guess it could still be Belle, but Em did talk in that TV Guide interview with Bobby as if she was sticking around….and while I think that it’s always possible she’s gotten tired of not working, I’d have to ask why she’d choose to leave now and certainly why Adam/Eddy would make it a permanent thing? I mean, if she wanted to leave to find work, you’d think that they’d leave Belle’s return open in case Em wanted to come back. I haven’t in the past hought that her relationship with Bobby would be enough to keep her, but they do appear to be very close and she adores working with him. I just don’t think she’s leaving on her own.
I guess all we fans can do is hope that our favorites don’t get the axe. I can’t imagine they’d kill Belle off………sigh.
[adrotate group="5"]Nobody ever said a main actor was being fired. Please, that’s really speculation. An actor/actor is leaving the show. We have no idea what agreements have been made between actors and producers, whatever.
Using the term “fired” is inappropriate and misleading. For example, someone may have signed a two year leading actor contract which gives them benefits etc. We have no idea from which side the choice to kill off a character came from, the actor/actress, or the producers.
Using the term “fired” is inappropriate and misleading. For example, someone may have signed a two year leading actor contract which gives them benefits etc. We have no idea from which side the choice to kill off a character came from, the actor/actress, or the producers.
Well said!
Does anyone know if this has come to pass yet?
Does anyone know if this has come to pass yet?
The last time I saw Auseillo asked about it (maybe two-ish weeks ago in his Tuesday spoiler article) he said it hadn’t come to pass yet.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"kranen wrote: Does anyone know if this has come to pass yet?
The last time I saw Auseillo asked about it (maybe two-ish weeks ago in his Tuesday spoiler article) he said it hadn’t come to pass yet.
Hmm. I was convinced when it first came out that it wouldn’t be for ONCE. Now I’m starting to rethink that…
I think is really odd that one week after the ouat death spoiler, appears online a article saying that an actor in a tv drama show and that is going to die on screen just receive a proposition to star in a new show, and according to the article we may find out soon. Probably they will spoile who it is after the actor film his death scene.
If this is about OUAT, maybe that is the reason why they gave away the death spoiler so soon, and why adam and eddie say that the actor/actress wont be available for flashbacks.
Not saying that is OUAT, but this is a huge coincidence.
I think is really odd that one week after the ouat death spoiler, appears online a article saying that an actor in a tv drama show and that is going to die on screen just receive a proposition to star in a new show,
It’s not a new article, it’s from October, which is why Kranen asked if the truth behind it has been revealed yet.
I’d like it to be for one of our guys because that would mean that we may get to see them again in something else soon. Though that article does say, “I hear he won’t have to keep his trap shut for much longer,” and like I said, that was written way back in October, and the death won’t be happening on Once until, what, April? But if like RG said, it was mentioned just two weeks ago that it hasn’t happened yet, then I guess our guys are still in the running.
The last time I saw Auseillo asked about it (maybe two-ish weeks ago in his Tuesday spoiler article) he said it hadn’t come to pass yet.
Very interesting!
"That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
I read in a Ask Ausiello that it did come to pass… I’ll update when I find the actual one.
EDIT: I found the article, and I’ve included a screenshot of the question. The post is from his December 17th “Ask Ausiello” post. Picture:
Keeper of Thor’s Hammer, Will Scarlet’s Genie Bottle, Emma’s Gun, Emma and Henry’s Moment at the Castle, Cora, and the infamous Family Tree!
The topic ‘TVLine Jan 20: A Death is Coming’ is closed to new replies.