Home › Forums › Once Upon a Time › Season Two › General Season Two spoilers › TVLine OUaT Spoilers!!
- This topic has 73 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by Demileto.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 8, 2013 at 12:53 am #136500RumplesGirlKeymaster
The OUaT spoilers start around 7:50 (the other stuff is an interview with the celeb star)
Discussion includes:
–Theories about Neal (oh man. We may all be wrong)
–Tamara theories (yeah…wow.)[adrotate group="5"]"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"April 8, 2013 at 1:26 am #184890DemiletoParticipantTruth be told, the moment we heard about the finale spoilers regarding the Lost Boys, I understood he wouldn’t turn out to be Peter. The flashback will clearly be in Bae’s POV, so it’d take a lot of story stretching not to make it clear to the audience that he was Peter Pan, a character we aren’t supposed to meet until season 3, not to mention the mysterious hooded guy, clearly the character named Felix in the casting call.
I’m actually relieved. I thought having him be Peter would only make sense for the parallels, as he hasn’t shown most of Peter’s defining character traits – cocky, boastful and careless, but brave -, he doesn’t seem like the type who would be a leader and it’d downgrade his relationship with Emma to a Peter Pan/OC one. Peter and Wendy are often portrayed as a young but true love that never lasts because Peter can’t accept that growing up is part of life, I’d think that should he ever become an adult Wendy’d be the one he’d want to be with, one of her descendants being the next best thing (hello, 1991’s Hook).
Where do we go from here? Well, Bae came to our world around 8 years after the curse brought everyone here. We’ve seen Dylan Schmid among the actors playing the lost boys in Stevenson, so perhaps Peter and the Lost Boys set off to find Hook because his abscense in Neverland left Peter incredibly bored. š That means we might be seeing Peter as an adult next season; wanna bet we’ll get a repeat of early season 2 where every dark-haired actor cast we speculated was Baelfire? š
As for Tamara, the lack of a FTL connection to her definitely strengthens the possibility that she has a secret organization backing her up IMO.
April 8, 2013 at 1:29 am #184892RumplesGirlKeymasterSince Matt (the interviewer) quoted Adam and Eddy saying that they’ve seen a lot of theories and none of them are right, I think we can take both Peter Pan and a Lost Boy off the table since those are the most popular. (OMG. Daniel won’t have to drink coffee! This is the truly horrible news!!) But we do know that he knows Hook, presumably from Neverland. Did he crew for Hook? Maybe he fought against Pan and the Lost Boys?
Tamara. I have no theories anymore regarding her. The corporation thing is starting to look better than it did before I heard this interview cause I was all set with daughter of Robin and Marian.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"April 8, 2013 at 2:17 am #184906DemiletoParticipant@RumplesGirl wrote:
Since Matt (the interviewer) quoted Adam and Eddy saying that they’ve seen a lot of theories and none of them are right, I think we can take both Peter Pan and a Lost Boy off the table since those are the most popular. (OMG. Daniel won’t have to drink coffee! This is the truly horrible news!!) But we do know that he knows Hook, presumably from Neverland. Did he crew for Hook? Maybe he fought against Pan and the Lost Boys?
Maybe at the beginning, I guess; I’d certainly give depth to a relationship between them. But he has to have joined the Lost Boys at some point because Dylan has filmed scenes with them, hasn’t he?
April 8, 2013 at 2:25 am #184908RumplesGirlKeymasterWe know he’s filmed scenes with boys. But we don’t know that they are the Lost Boys, though we all thought it was a safe bet. Now I don’t know. They boys were supposed to be about 16 and have a leader so we all assumed Lost Boys.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"April 8, 2013 at 2:34 am #184913MysteryKat25ParticipantHmm, that does throw a wrench into things doesn’t it? Nothing’s canon til it’s on the show so it’ll be interesting to see how they show it one way or the other (showing someone else as Peter, probably season 3, or perhaps there’s just a lot more to the NealFire story than anybody has been able to guess yet. They didn’t exactly say it was all wrong, just that nobody guessed the main twist of it from what I understand at least.) Looking forward to getting more Neverland story whatever it is and I’m actually intrigued by the fact that maybe we have all gotten it completely wrong. Would be nice for something to still surprise us.
However…if he spent any time at all in Neverland, Daniel still has to drink coffee (yuck), he’ll just get to have something in it to make it taste better when it’s proven that NealFire isn’t Peter. At least that’s my understanding.
Keeper of Hook's Trenchcoat.
April 8, 2013 at 2:43 am #184917DemiletoParticipant@RumplesGirl wrote:
We know he’s filmed scenes with boys. But we don’t know that they are the Lost Boys, though we all thought it was a safe bet. Now I don’t know. They boys were supposed to be about 16 and have a leader so we all assumed Lost Boys.
I still think they are, but Bae doesn’t necessarily have to have an enmity with Hook since ever. Hook spoke fondly of the Lost Boys in Tallahasse and hinted that Bae didn’t want to be found by Rumple in “The Outsider”; clearly both had a relationship in Neverland, but by “The Queen is Dead” it seems to have ended for him to carelessly leave him locked in NY. Maybe Peter Pan played into this; the beginning of Peter and Hook’s rivalry could be what led Bae to cut the contact with the captain.
BTW, are we sure the characters are the ones supposed to be 16? Couldn’t it be just the actors, and the characters themselves are slightly younger?
April 8, 2013 at 3:20 am #184925SlurpeezParticipantOh well. Still, I’ll carry the hope of Nealfire Pan until disproven entirely. š I saw someone write on Tumblr:
Point of clarification: So what they actually say is that they havenāt seen anyone get the theories on Nealās backstory right yet. NOT that no one has gotten a Peter Pan theory right.
So, we could have Neal being Peter Pan, but the details are what’s different….some twist on the original tale.
Or, Neal could’ve been a pirate. Maybe he was turned into a merman by a sea witch. š
"Thatās how you know youāve really got a home. When you leave it, thereās this feeling that you canāt shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
April 8, 2013 at 3:54 am #184931kfchimeraParticipantMaybe the twist is there never was a “peter pan.” Perhaps all the lost boys were just like that, without a leader until Hook took them under his wing as part of his crew.
āIf I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?ā -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
April 8, 2013 at 4:03 am #184933HappyEndingsSpectatorBTW, are we sure the characters are the ones supposed to be 16? Couldn’t it be just the actors, and the characters themselves are slightly younger?
Once Upon a Time’s finale!
The ABC fantasy hit is currently casting three 16-year-old boys who are part of a sinister group. The leader Felix is tough, while the other two are identical twins and all three roles could becoming recurring. Hmmā¦could we be meeting the Lost Boys?!What if Felix the leader is Peter Pan?
For Once Upon a Time episode 2.21, the role of Heidi is being cast. She’s 13, British, and also described as being compassionate, mischievous, and somewhat naive about how dangerous the world can be
-
AuthorPosts
The topic ‘TVLine OUaT Spoilers!!’ is closed to new replies.