- This topic has 679 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 11 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
[adrotate group="5"]
Lemme guess. The Brothers Grimm live inexplicably in NYC
OR: Mufasa and Scar do! NYC is often called a Jungle after all
Have to say i find it odd that these NY location is back, taking in consideration the name of the episode, Rumple being in NY, and those Set pictures from fans, that saw sets of Camelot, UW and OZ, but somehow they also took pics of boxes mentioning Neal`s apartment, when that set was not used this season, and i doubt that they have those boxes, in the mid of the studio, for a set that is not being used, i mean if was used last season, has to be hidden away, not in places where fans can covenient take pics, so wonder if that was there bc they would construct that set again.
If this NY trip is related to the brothers, maybe they were Neal`s bosses, LOL, bc totally makes sense on ouat scheme of things."I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
x
Awe! This adorable pic is so bittersweet, especially if the filming set reports turn out to be true. Seriously, if the writers think killing off yet another honorable thief and father in favor of a pirate who nearly got the town all killed is a good idea, then I have to seriously question their morality."That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
Awe! This adorable pic is so bittersweet, especially if the filming set reports turn out to be true. Seriously, if the writers think killing off yet another honorable thief and father in favor of a pirate who nearly got the town all killed is a good idea, then I have to seriously question their morality.
I just don’t think we can look at it like that. Major deaths of “good” people and keeping a “bad” person alive, is not a reflection of the writer’s morality. That’s not fair. I’m assuming Robin’s alleged death will be important and will affect the story, especially Regina’s. As long as his death isn’t for nothing, I can’t put the writer’s morality in question.
I just don’t think we can look at it like that. Major deaths of “good” people and keeping a “bad” person alive, is not a reflection of the writer’s morality. That’s not fair. I’m assuming Robin’s alleged death will be important and will affect the story, especially Regina’s. As long as his death isn’t for nothing, I can’t put the writer’s morality in question.
With all due respect, I can look at it however I want. I do have to question the writers’ judgement if that in fact does occur. I never said anyone else had to question it. I just said I did.
"That’s how you know you’ve really got a home. When you leave it, there’s this feeling that you can’t shake. You just miss it." Neal Cassidy
With all due respect, I can look at it however I want. I do have to question the writers’ judgement if that in fact does occur. I never said anyone else had to question it. I just said I did.
Still don’t understand why you take a personal offense to things I say sometimes. I am simply commenting on what you said, and I happen to disagree with it. Has no one disagreed with you on here until now? I use the word “I” many times because it is what I think. I, emphasis on I, don’t think it’s fair to call their morality in question simply for killing off a good person and keeping a bad one, especially if the killing off of the good one moves the story and affects characters in a profound and interesting way. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t believe I ever said you weren’t allowed to look at it with your own perspective or feel differently. Or that you were wrong. But aren’t I allowed to disagree without getting a snarky “with all due respect, I can look at it however I want,” comment? Sheesh.
With all due respect, I can look at it however I want. I do have to question the writers’ judgement if that in fact does occur. I never said anyone else had to question it. I just said I did.
Still don’t understand why you take a personal offense to things I say sometimes. I am simply commenting on what you said, and I happen to disagree with it. Has no one disagreed with you on here until now? I use the word “I” many times because it is what I think. I, emphasis on I, don’t think it’s fair to call their morality in question simply for killing off a good person and keeping a bad one, especially if the killing off of the good one moves the story and affects characters in a profound and interesting way. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t believe I ever said you weren’t allowed to look at it with your own perspective or feel differently. Or that you were wrong. But aren’t I allowed to disagree without getting a snarky “with all due respect, I can look at it however I want,” comment? Sheesh.
In all fairness, it is somewhat eyebrow raising that the writers would (potentially) kill off Robin, a father of two whose worst crime is being not very dynamic compared to other characters, yet they are willing to bring back Hook who we’ve been shown is a less than stellar guy yet gets treated by the show as the greatest thing since sliced bread.
At this stage, it seems like Hook is solidly entering creator’s pet territory
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CreatorsPetAll magic comes with a price!
Keeper of FelixI’m assuming Robin’s alleged death will be important and will affect the story, especially Regina’s.
If we hadn’t seen, in the past, deaths that were totally unimportant and did not affect the story of characters, then I’d agree that this is a fair assumption. Death in narrative can absolutely mean something. It can have weight and power and drive storyline for a long time.
However, that’s not what we see in OUAT a fair amount of the time. I’m not even just talking about Neal’s death. Many deaths get reflected upon for maybe one episode (and even, maybe only a fraction of that episode) and then the story tends to forget how death impacts people because shiny shiny plot.
If Robin is dying (and goodness knows it looks that way now) then I have serious reservations that the show will “make it count” as it were.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
The topic ‘Who Is Filming Now? Season 5 (PART 3)’ is closed to new replies.