- This topic has 68 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I included the link but for some reason the hyperlink I typed in didn’t work, so that is why it says “Source URL” instead of actually being a link to the url in the hyperlink. I apologize for doing that incorrectly but it seemed like a glitch from Caspar-Peeves our friendly forum ghost because it looked right in the edit screen. I still think that zooming in on the central part of the frame might create a misleading impression about Robin, but we will have to wait and see. Right now that is the only clue we have so I suppose it is fair to assume the person on the stretcher is important to him, and I imagine there are many other characters before Neal that I would think of as close to RH. I think it could be a merry man because they are expendable story-telling wise if they need to establish a serious deadly threat. Just not a named one like Little John or Friar Tuck please (and definitely we know it is not Will Scarlett!).
I agree Cinders–except the Solutions packet probably has characters we have not even met yet in it and weapons we do not even know exist (like magical tasers!).
Let’s have fun guessing, and respect that many things are possible right now and all we know for sure is we know nothing for sure.
[adrotate group="5"]“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
We’ve not seen Robin be cowardly. We’ve seen him break into both Rumple’s and Maleficent’s castles. So the cowardly lion wouldn’t fit Robin’s character IMO.
He wouldn’t have to be cowardly in order for it to apply though. Lana tweeted that Regina’s finally found a man who can handle her, which implies that Robin has some balls, which equals courage. We don’t know if they might give him an origin story that involves less brave times in his past, but even without that, I think just being able to take on Regina qualifies him for having courage as a theme of his character development.
Hook’s Girl pointed this out in another thread, but there is a man right behind RH (you get the briefest glimpse of him). He has somewhat curly hair and is bit larger. I think that’s Little John, so we can probably take him out of the running. And I agree with KFC that if it is one of the Merry Men chances are it’s not one that people already know from tradition.
Let’s have fun guessing, and respect that many things are possible right now and all we know for sure is we know nothing for sure.
This.
remember, we’ve all had theories that were silly, weird, crackish, and based off our own interpretations of ALL the things. Baelcchio the Wizard of Neverland or Undead Milah Mermaid, anyone???
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"It’s Will Scarlet! 😛 He’s lost his genie cuffs and got spit out into our world. 😉 How’s that for crack.
Yes, you’re right about Rumple. It probably isn’t him then with Whale asking who did this to him. This is going to drive us nuts. The only thing we don’t know for certain is it isn
't Charming, Hook, Robin or Whale.Keeper of Rumplestiltskin's and Neal's spears and war paint and crystal ball.
It’s Will Scarlet! 😛 He’s lost his genie cuffs and got spit out into our world. 😉 How’s that for crack.
😆 I would actually be totally fine with that, because I’d be very happy if they managed to work Will into the main show after Wonderland ends.
es, you’re right about Rumple. It probably isn’t him then with Whale asking who did this to him. This is going to drive us nuts. The only thing we don’t know for certain is it isn’t Charming, Hook, Robin or Whale.
We also know that it’s a man, so it’s not: Snow, Belle, Emma, Regina, the fairies.
I think we can count out Henry as well because Regina, Emma and Neal would be there.
For all we know it’s not actually one of main cast but one of the extras.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"I’m thinking that the new type of storytelling is putting the fairy tale in our time. WWW has made her yellow brick road, and it leads to storybrooke. OZ is storybrooke.
I also think that whoever is on that stretcher, and whatever happened to them is what led Hook to search for Emma and Henry.
Emma is Dorothy. Storybrooke is OZ. WWW is wreaking havoc on Storybrooke and nothing is as it should be.
( I’m bored, and just making up stuff to pass the time.)
For all we know it’s not actually one of main cast but one of the extras.
Perhaps it’s Claude’s brother or second cousin twice removed. Otherwise known as Guard #124. 😛
I think it’s time for some spoilers. We’re stir-crazy.
Keeper of Rumplestiltskin's and Neal's spears and war paint and crystal ball.
Emma is Dorothy. Storybrooke is OZ. WWW is wreaking havoc on Storybrooke and nothing is as it should be.
( I’m bored, and just making up stuff to pass the time.)
You could be onto something with Emma and Dorothy, because Emma is now a girl separated from her family who needs to find her way home.
I’m thinking that the new type of storytelling is putting the fairy tale in our time. WWW has made her yellow brick road, and it leads to storybrooke. OZ is storybrooke. I also think that whoever is on that stretcher, and whatever happened to them is what led Hook to search for Emma and Henry. Emma is Dorothy. Storybrooke is OZ. WWW is wreaking havoc on Storybrooke and nothing is as it should be. ( I’m bored, and just making up stuff to pass the time.)
That’s an interesting idea. Emma = Dorothy; Henry = Toto; Regina = Glinda (because of her conflict with the WWW); Rumple = the lion (?)….
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
The topic ‘Why/How Is Hook In Our Land? (Theories)’ is closed to new replies.