Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I actually think is also funny his opinion about love triangles, how he is not excited about them, which is hilarious since in GoS there is a Love Square, but if is done like the turkish version, then i guess is like he says, serves a purpose on the story, bc i have to say that the Love square/triangle/pentagon that happened on the Turkish verson of GoS, was without a doubt the best writing ever for these types of relationships i ever saw, was so well done that in the end u didnt even kwew who to ship, you just wanted all the characters to be happy.
But either way, i also somehow sense that his words about the love triangle was the same as saying that triangles are good when they serve a end and are well done, aka, ouat one didnt served a purporse and was really bad written.The triangle never had a purpose other than to have a triangle and fanservice. I could never understand why would Emma be invested in Hook or even why would Hook be invested in Emma, and if you have to kill one guy so the girl would end up with the other guy, then something is wrong.
OUAT’s overuse of triangles is tiring and unrealistic and that trope really needs to fade. With that being said, I don’t think that love triangles are necessarily bad, there were some that I liked such as Peeta-Katnis-Gale, but in order for a triangle to be executed properly, the writer needs to put a lot of effort into developing each character on their own, developing each connection with each of the couples and letting the reader/viewer understand why there is a dilema. In the case of CSF, we had a really well developed character – Emma, we had a really good set up with SF, and then they suddenly inset Hook into the mix and we’re supposed to pretend as if He and Emma have this huge deep connection and that she would actually choose him over Neal, who had a really good set up. In addition, if you take out Emma, Neal still has a lot of other aspects to his character, while Hook has none.[adrotate group="5"]"All your questions are pointless"
Merlin said that to Emma when they were alone just the two of them having a conversation while Belle was probably on her way to Camelot, I wonder how she knows about it. Oh, the audience knows about it so it means every character on the show knows that too, some viewer must have told her.
"All your questions are pointless"
Why does Hook have to be a jerk to all of them? Do they purposefully write him like that? Does he not realize they are in this situation because of him? I get writing a “sassy” line sometimes for fun, but doing it all the time is ridiculous.
"All your questions are pointless"
I always said would be Dorothy and Ruby, many reasons, 1st Mulan never was declared in show canon Bi or lesbian and after bc they have more freedom with Dorothy and Ruby that have no Disney live action movies coming, unlike Mulan and neither the other 2 have animation movies where they were given male love interests so Disney may not let them do that twist and show Mulan as a lesbian. Especially bc they never said in interviews that Mulan would be part of the lgbt couple. I even say that since Mulan, Ruby and Dorothy wont appear past this epi, Ruby and Dorothy may end dying and they will parallel Hercules and Meg story epi, and will show them both together movin on to heaven, that will appear to have rainbows, lol.
Unlike Belle, Aurora, Ariel, Jasmine, Tiana, Elsa, Anna and Merida, Disney does not own Mulan, she’s a public domain character and OUAT can do whatever they want to do with her regardless to what Disney want as well as Snow White, Cinderella and Rapunzel.
"All your questions are pointless"
It will be Dorothy and Red because they want to do “what?! Mulan is not the one to be in the gay relationship?!” twist for the sake of shock value and nothing more, that of course if the relationship will be something more than just ambiguous.
"All your questions are pointless"
If it’s Ruby and Dorothy who wants to place a bet that “Ruby Slippers” is the writers cutesy attempt to name the ship?
They “don’t write ships”.
"All your questions are pointless"
Some things I’m thinking about today –Was anyone else super annoyed at Hook’s impatience with Henry and the stories Henry was writing? Like it wasn’t good enough that the newly minted Author and 13 yr old couldn’t zap them out of the Underworld already? –To add insult to injury, Emma doesn’t even rebuff Hook’s meanness to her son, but instead makes Henry out to be a sullen teenager when Henry gets upset and walks out. I mean, geez, Swan. You’re asking your 13 yr old to do something that no one has ever done before and he’s doing his best and he clearly doesn’t have control over this power yet and all you’re doing is sitting around the Death Apartment fretting with your boy toy. Maybe you cut the kid some slack????
Did you really expect Emma to be mad at her super perfect super hot BF that can do no wrong?
This whole scene was inserted so A&E could have Henry as their proxy and tell the audience “we’re doing the best we can so stop ‘criticizing’ us”. Wasn’t impressed to be honest. I thought the scene where Isaac told a fan to … was more truthful to who A&E are.
"All your questions are pointless"
Is anyone else bothered by Fictional Kansas? How many fictional lands are there? When it was lands like Wonderland, Oz, and Neverland, it made a lot of sense (those are actual fictional worlds) but Kansas, London–Victorian and Jazz Age–and it’s getting extremely silly.
I’m bothered as well. Adding more pointless worlds ruin the worldbuilding. I never understand why some characters need to have a world of their own.
"All your questions are pointless"
