Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I think what they meant was that they don’t write these characters solely with the “ship” they are attached to. As they say in the first answer to the first question, the relationship they are in is just one part of the character they are trying to tell the story of.
Maybe back in season 1…
Sometimes (a lot of times) I think A and E need to stop talking. Just full stop.
And writing.
[adrotate group="5"]We never created “Swan Queen” or “Snowing” or “Rumbelle” or “Captain Swan” or any of the ships, subtextual or not—our fans took our stories and ran with them. We fully expect them to continue to do so.
….what?
SwanQueen, maybe, since a lot of it is subtextual but they are really going to say that they didn’t create Snowing, Rumbelle, or CS (and more)? That they don’t write for those ships? Did…did they watch the S5A finale?Well, they arguably didn’t create CS, either, but that’s a discussion for a different thread.
But they definitely created Rumble (or would that be Jane, since she wrote “Skin Deep?”).
I made some of mine own. Cruella, because she’s such a delight (I may do Ingrid and Ursula, too), Christopher Walken, because I can, Dustin Hoffman, because we must, and Jason Isaacs, because he really played up the creepiness of Captain Hook.
Personally, I am not too fond of my work on Jason Isaacs’; it was from a nighttime screenshot, so I had to use false color.
Another possibility: Emma journeys to the underworld because she has something very important to tell Hook.
Something that cannot be repeated on this forum?
Or it could be a flashback with Dylan Schmid and Abby Ross, and the warning is about some security guard.
Has anyone seen the spoiler Mark Isham posted? again?http://storybrookemirror.tumblr.com/tagged/5.12-souls-of-the-departed
I did see it.
I thought I posted this in the SFer thread, but heres the one I made, just because I think itd be cool.
Graham!
