Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
sciencevsmagicParticipant
…is Cinderella carrying a gun?
Yup, definitely looks like a rifle.
[adrotate group="5"]sciencevsmagicParticipantMaybe each savior is unique and like there is a savior for each realm / kingdom or whatever
I hope not! Nor do I want the role of Savior to be passed down through death. The only way I can imagine the idea of multiple Saviors working is if a Savior is created every time some powerful evil magic (like a curse) is performed. It could be a magical law that such dark magic always results in a Savior, kind of like the key to a code being contained within the code itself. The destruct mechanism for the curse would come into existence along with the curse itself.
But honestly, I’m quite wary about ‘delving into Savior mythology’. They’ve already confused things a bit by stating that it’s the Savior’s job to give everyone their happy ending. To me, putting this responsibility on the shoulders of one person is ridiculous. What if some people don’t want a happy ending? What if some don’t deserve it? What is a happy ending anyway? This is a job for someone omnipotent, which Saviors clearly aren’t. It makes much more sense for a Savior to give everyone a chance to get their happy ending. This would fit in with Emma lifting the first curse, as the whole point of that was to keep everyone from what they loved. A Savior should restore free will/memories or whatever, but each person should always be resonsible for their own happy ending.
July 29, 2016 at 10:21 pm in reply to: EW 7/29 – Spoiler Room – Belle Getting Out of the Box #326201sciencevsmagicParticipantI like all of it! It’s everything I could have hoped for for Belle! Looking forward to her centric now!!
July 27, 2016 at 5:11 am in reply to: New OUAT Novel: Disney Releasing Once Upon A Time: Regina Rising #326177sciencevsmagicParticipantCould be. I am expecting it to be another fairytale character though. Honestly, if it wasn’t for that travesty of a “backstory” for Maleficent, this would have been an awesome time for this story to be about how Regina met and became friends/enemies with her. I remember people once speculated Maleficent was once her fairy godmother :/ If its Daniel, that’s cool too, but we already know how that story ends so I don’t think it’ll be him for that reason but it could be.
It sounds like the story is mostly set when Regina was ‘young, pure and innocent’. So I doubt she was friends with anyone shady – unless of course, it was someone who later developed into a villain. If it was someone other than Daniel who was a nice person, I can’t help but think that we’d have heard of them. Regina didn’t seem to have many people in her life at that stage. A good friend would have been a HUGE supporting factor for her. That’s why I can’t get past Daniel. Either way, reading about Regina developing a friendship will definitely be interesting.
sciencevsmagicParticipantYes! 100 is actually unexpectedly good.
Cool! So there’s at least 3 watchers here. I’m curious to see whether S3 maintains the high standard.
I suggest everyone to see Stranger Things
Yep, planning to.
July 27, 2016 at 4:41 am in reply to: New OUAT Novel: Disney Releasing Once Upon A Time: Regina Rising #326174sciencevsmagicParticipantI wonder who this new friend is.
Daniel?! Lover and only friend. Would explain why it took her 40 years to get over him.
sciencevsmagicParticipantYou watch it too? If we have several fans here, we should start up a discussion thread.
sciencevsmagicParticipantI’ve started watching ‘The 100’ on Netflix. So far, I’ve made it through 2 seasons. It’s good! Lots of action, interesting characters, complex themes, strong female leads, morally ambiguous behaviour which has consequences. It has so many things that we’ve been pining for on OUAT.
sciencevsmagicParticipantYou see in these types of things, there are always ABc people with them, the so called PR people, the persons that according to adam make the marketing and publicity of the show, they are the bosses, so if they say, u have to pretend u are really hook and emma, there is no Jmo or colin, they cant say no.
But how is it that Bobby can not even show up at some PR events without consequences? Same with Ginny. Doesn’t that show that these guys have at least some autonomy in how they present themselves? I’m genuinely confused.
sciencevsmagicParticipantColin probably wouldn’t get fired but that doesn’t mean ABC doesn’thave other ways to punish “bad behavior.” I’m not justifying Colin or JMo but we do hear stories all the time from, say, the music industry about producers holding on to the reigns of the singer; they may not lose their contract but the producer/company can threaten everything else—family, money, tour dates, ect.
This is where their unions should step in. Is there such a thing as an actors’ union? Also, are you serious about their family being threatened?!!
-
AuthorPosts