Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
i didn’t mind it but it would have been nice to see Emma and Snow really talk about their lives so we could have gotten some more answers as to what happened to Emma. The SB stuff was dumb with David being in charged and the Dr Story etc. but it is over with hope they do better in Season 3
[adrotate group="5"]Remember we never found out what happened to Cinderalla’s husband at the well when they try to break a deal.
I also think the reason they didn’t have money is because of David’s dad didn’t want to receive money for what he just did.
Ruth and David are Bible names so there must be a connection some how with this line. Ruth married a close rich relative named Boaz per the Bible, then had a son named Obed who was the father of Jesse who was the father of David.
1) Ruth and Boaz
2) Obed
3) Jesse
4) David and JamesBut in this case they skipped Obed or maybe Jesse or both of of them in order for Ruth to be the mother of David, other wise she would have been David’s, Great Grandmother instead of mother.
1) Ruth and ?
2) David and James@KFChimera wrote:
Maybe they would have been set up, if the father hadn’t died. Do we know when that happened? It’s possible that Ruth was left alone with just little kid David, and ran it into the ground until he was old enough to help but by then it was just barely enough to survive.
Remember the father had remorse after he did it what if he went to Rumble and told him he didn’t want to do it and Rumble killed him
I think David’s may match his fathers life when David had a chance to be King but gave it up for a women so did his father sort of like they did with Snow and Emma parallel.lives.
But I still want know why they were broke if James deal was the same as David’s then Ruth should have been set up for life.
His father could have given up his throne in order to marry Ruth,. I wonder why they were still broke if the deal with KG was to take care of them? Do we have to see David in that curley hair style again?
So from July through April that is 10 months right but don’t you have to take out the Holidays, last year didn’t they take Dec off pretty much the whole month and I can’t remember the other month that we hardly saw Once.
@Josephine wrote:
I think what’s confusing people also is that the show has moved a lot of it’s filming to a soundstage. They’ve recreated much of Storybrooke elsewhere. We’ve known that since before the finale. I’m okay with that because it seems like there will be less spoiler leakage from places like VanCity Filming.
I’ve read quite a few articles where people are saying we’re done with Storybrooke, even on the last podcast for the finale they mentioned it probably wouldn’t be featured, but I think we’re still going to see it. Emilie is still a regular, the dwarfs are still employed, and Eddy and Adam have said we’ll be seeing lots of Belle and Neal. Although Eddy and Adam not come through on promises before, I really can’t see them abandoning the town completely.
And remember, Rumple’s dagger is still in Storybrooke. What happens if the dagger is in a world separate from him. Would it still control him? (Okay, I just got some thoughts that revolve around Belle, Rumple and the dagger 😉 )
Thanks J, that is what I thought too
According to the Director’s Guild of BC Production List, Once Upon a Time season three will only shoot for seven months!
That’s a whole three months without our favourite cast members in Vancouver. So why the change in filming schedule for the hit ABC TV show?
http://vancityfilming.com/category/once-upon-a-time/
