Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Vancity and others have said she drinks the potion.
Emma’s not easily charmed by Hook in NYC. Well, our first clue came when she kneed him in the jewels in 3.11. But beyond that, we have the spoilers pics (which Adam and Eddy may or may not know are out there) which show Hook getting arrested, presumably after bugging Emma in the park. Just because it said Emma’s not easily falling for his charm does not mean she won’t in the end. Ultimately they hug, and they both leave w/ Henry in the Bug. No way would she do any of those things if she did not remember him. Besides Hook loves a challenge, so he’s not gonna give up.
Hook knows Emma, so he knows that she’s gonna be stubborn. I mean he’s the one that without even knowing her for ten hours told her she’s an orphan, that’s whom she is. It wasn’t until season three that Emma couldn’t admit that she truly is one so that’s pretty awesome for not knowing someone in ten hours not to mention the whole “being in love” thing and trust issues. He read her like an open book, so of course he knows now getting her memories back isn’t gonna be easy.
Thankfully he has the potion.
2. There’s a “good reason” why Neal didn’t come to NYC.
I still think this is one of two things: either Charming, Snow & Co. find out about the jail OR Neal and Belle get a clue where Rumple is.
Emma’s response to seeing Neal would probably be worse than her reaction to Hook because her last memories of him are not good.
3. Outlaw Queen
The fact that it’s now confirmed that Regina and Robin’s story begins in episode 13 that to me makes it more likely that the person on the gurney is Roland or one of Robin’s merry men and this will somehow connect to Regina/Robin in the past. Perhaps Regina helped then as well and that’s how their story/romance begins in the past/present.
[adrotate group="5"]I laugh when people try to use things from over a year to go to show their arguments.
I still remember that quote Adam said about Hook could be good in Vegas but he’s not father material, that was AFTER QOH aired. So we didn’t know much about what was coming for Hook(or the broken leg that would side-line Colin for most of the remainder of the season).
Personally I’m gonna go with what the writers are saying now, over what they said over a year ago. I figure that was common sense but IDK.
Also I really would like to know why Hook is categorized as the obstacle to SF and not the other way around. In the canon of the show when it comes to the triangle this has been what has happened.
It was Hook that was told Neal was still alive after the kiss he had with Emma by Pan and essentially it ruined his mood and his hope.
It was Hook that confessed his feelings for Emma in the cave knowing that it could in part end up with him getting broken hearted and he did it for Emma.
It was Hook whom the camera focused on during the reunion of Neal and Emma and also when Neal and Emma were having their private moment, which Hook eavesdropped and the camera showed us his reaction.
It was Neal whom interrupted the moment Hook and Emma were having and this was shown by the music of the CS kiss playing in the background and stopping immediately when Neal came back.
It was Hook whom upon arrival to SB told Neal that he was gonna step aside for Henry’s sake. He believes Henry deserves his chance at family.
So how exactly is Hook being portrayed as the obstacle? If he’s the one that’s doing things that is either gonna hurt him willingly or he’s always doing things to give Neal the edge.
How is HE the obstacle? I’m not even counting the Hook and Emma moments or anything, I just want to know how is Hook an obstacle?
PriceofMagic wrote: CaptainEala is welcome to come to the SwanFire thread and defend her points if she so chooses. And just for the record, Hookian, CSers have gone to the SwanFire thread before and taken my opinion and brought it back here and called it things such as “invalid”. I have not called CaptainEala’s opinion “invalid”, I have merely disagreed with it.
Why should she have to come to your thread to defend her post? Why can’t her post just be posted here(which it is) and be left alone, without you having to come in here and scrutinize her with it? Rumple’s Girl even said that it’s not a good thing to come into one or the others thread to copy posts then bring them back to your respective thread and then disprove them. Let them have their opinion, she shouldn’t have to defend her post for anything. She posted her post for CS shippers, HER post that YOU copied and brought to the SF thread and deconstructed it. Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Really? I seem to remember I posted something in the SwanFire thread for the SwanFire shippers and yet it somehow magically found its way over here and was called “invalid” by CaptainEala. Hypocrisy is not a nice trait.
Like I said POM, two wrongs do not make a right.
Since you are quoting what I said, you better be careful because I have never ever said that anyone’s opinion is invalid. I have always allowed everyone their opinion.
This is the CS thread and I know that you’re posts are helpful in a way. It does allow us to still be the biggest thread on the entire forum so that is much appreciated. 🙂
However if you’re not here to discuss CS in a positive way then this isn’t the thread for you.
CaptainEala is welcome to come to the SwanFire thread and defend her points if she so chooses. And just for the record, Hookian, CSers have gone to the SwanFire thread before and taken my opinion and brought it back here and called it things such as “invalid”. I have not called CaptainEala’s opinion “invalid”, I have merely disagreed with it.
Why should she have to come to your thread to defend her post? Why can’t her post just be posted here(which it is) and be left alone, without you having to come in here and scrutinize her with it?
Rumple’s Girl even said that it’s not a good thing to come into one or the others thread to copy posts then bring them back to your respective thread and then disprove them.
Let them have their opinion, she shouldn’t have to defend her post for anything. She posted her post for CS shippers, HER post that YOU copied and brought to the SF thread and deconstructed it.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
In OUAT (and OUATIW) we have consistently been shown: that TL does not move on it always finds each other when it is separated, it ruins the couples lives that both partners need to believe in their love SF literally fits NONE of these criteria. I mean, you could ignore it not meeting one or two, but ALL FOUR? NOPE.
Does anyone care to elaborate on these points?
PoM has made a post about this in the SF thread saying that SF meets all four criteria. I know and no offense but I don’t care to elaborate on any points nor do I care what POM said to try to deconstruct CaptainEala’s opinion. I think it’s kind of childish for people whom clearly doesn’t ship CS to come in here and read our posts then go back to the SF thread and disprove it in front of everybody else without having the person whom wrote it in the first place have a chance to defend the new allegations the person has placed on her. I could deconstruct what POM said but I’m not going to do that because she is entitled to her opinion, just the same as anyone else.
I say that the other way around as well with people whom ship CS to go in the thread and then to come here and laugh at what they’re saying. It’s why I don’t ever go in the SF thread for anything and I hope POM sees this because it IS childish!
I found out through someone PM’ing me.
hookian wrote: The funny thing was I didn’t even mention CS yet they were like “oh you’re a Hooker which normally means CS”. Way to judge someone. People are unbelievable.
Well your name on your avatar kind implies that you are a Hook fan so I am guessing they assume you are shipping Hook and Emma as well.
But someone shouldn’t make that kind of judgement especially when they don’t even bring up Hook/Emma.
The funny thing was I didn’t even mention CS yet they were like “oh you’re a Hooker which normally means CS”. Way to judge someone. People are unbelievable.
Emma & Hook that is very doubtful since the the triangle between Emma/Neal/Hook hasn’t even really had time to get going since Neverland.
If you can even call that a triangle, it’s been a pretty pitiful excuse for one so far.
JMO said in the NYCC comic con that by the end of the season Emma will wear a dress, hmm interesting.
Well if it’s gonna be Hook/Emma or Robin/Regina I expect it to to be a flashforward kind of like how HIMYM did Robin and Barney’s wedding reveal. Then the seasons upcoming would build towards the wedding.
If it’s not the obvious Rumbelle.
Elsa coming on to OUAT is a big hell yes because Frozen is an epic movie.
Love that Emma and Hook are paired up with the other potential weddings. 😆 The only way Emma’s gonna be included is if they do the cliche “I object” route and she’s getting married to Gorham’s character.
Regina and Robin is definitely a possibility and Regina is definitely one for a fancy wedding but that would mean Robin and Roland would join the family.
Rumbelle is the obvious choice. As far as people being confused by splashy wedding to me that just means that it’s gonna be on the Jolly Roger and Hook as Captain has the power to officiate it. Talk about a heck of a end point to Rumbelle and Hook’s feud. Hopefully if this happens people will let the bad blood with Rumple and Hook finally go which IMO it already has.
The babies, I’m thinking they’re gonna be betrothed to one another from birth. That’s the logistics behind these kind of things back then at least.
