Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jolly rogerParticipant
Thanks for posting HappyEndings.
[adrotate group="5"]jolly rogerParticipantI agree with obisgirl. It has been confirmed that Emma has no feelings for Neal (and it’s pretty obvious), so why would she want to make him jealous or prove it to him – there’s no need for it. The only reason Emma is going to be with Hook is because she falls in love with him and vice versa. He is exactly what she needs and she is exactly what he needs. 🙂
jolly rogerParticipantThanks for posting that RumplesGirl 🙂
jolly rogerParticipantWow, Thanks for posting DannyDubner! I remember from previous spoilers, Sherrif Graham and Regina were in the police car with the sirens going and they sped down the street. Maybe they were chasing this car that lost control or went over the line..? That’s all I can think of. We don’t really know much about this episode.
It looks intersting though. Thanks again! 😀
jolly rogerParticipantHappyEndings why so negative? You’re supposed to be happy, hence your name. 😀
I think people are being way overly crictical, it’s starting to get on my nerves to be honest. Just because 2 characters don’t ‘really add to the story’ doesn’t mean the whole show is bad. I don’t see any problem with the show, I think they’ve put in a lot of effort and it has certainly paid off. Each to their own I guess. But just give them a chance.
And I’m curious and a bit confused. If you don’t like Hook, why go on a thread about him. Do you see the humour there 😆And I’m pretty sure it’s Belle, not Bella. 😀
jolly rogerParticipantThanks for the info thatheles. I tried to resist but I couldn’t help it. I did already suspect that it would be Cora though. So now Regina is evil again I guess. I wonder how that would go down with Henry. I thought that Henry was number 1 in her life, he’s not going to like her going evil again.
I am so SICK of seeing the hateful tweets sent at Adam Horowitz and he’s actually responded to tons of it. Poor guy. Hope he realizes that a lot of us love & appreciate him for giving us a show we can love and be passionate about. We’re not all crazy…or at least, not hateful crazy. We do love our Once Upon A Time.
I’ve seen these too. They’re probably immature young people who haven’t been taught how to respect others. Unfortunately though, you can’t please everyone and some people can’t just be happy with what they got, they always need more or they want it their way. And I’m sure Adam and Eddy know that and were prepared for that. But the majority of viewers love this show and I’m sure the amount of viewers will increase – especially after the next episode.
This show hasn’t started again yet in Australia though and it’s been 3 months. Once it starts here, the ratings should increase dramatically – it’s very big here in Australia.jolly rogerParticipantHook’s not good but he’s not bad either. The producers/cast/directors want us to believe that Hook is not evil because they had introduced him as a broken man who had lost his love. All the other ‘villians’ (Regina, Cora, Rumple etc.) have been introduced as evil villians, and it wasn’t until later in the series that we actually see why they are bad. Hook was different – and they did this purposefully. This was planned. It’s not like they took time writing the script and filming the episode, aired it, and then thought ‘Uh oh, we weren’t supposed to show his tragedy yet’. This is all purposefully done so that straight away the audience will sympathise him and whenever he does ‘bad’ things such as shooting Belle, we understand why he did it. When we see other people doing evil things such as Cora, we think she is just a twisted evil woman. And they want us to think that because they purposefully haven’t shown us why she does that. They want us to hate her, but want us to sympathise Hook.
I don’t care how many times people say ‘But he shot Belle! He captured Archie! He killed a guard!’. I don’t care! It’s not going to change my mind. And it’s not going to change the fact that this was all done purposefully.
If they really wanted us to believe that he is an evil person, they wouldn’t have shown us his tragedy straight away as they had done with every other character.All that matters to me is that he is the perfect match for Emma. I don’t care what arguments people come up with, it’s not going to change the fact that Emma and Hook will be together and I believe are true love. And it’s not going to change the fact that Hook will soon let go of his revenge for Emma.
And I just want to point out one thing- Before Hook’s episode even aired, Colin was bumped up to series regular. Hook’s hand was in season 1 in the episode where Rumple takes Belle to his castle. So they had planned him since season 1. Neal has been in 4 episodes and is still a guest star. These things aren’t done by accident. Just a little something to think about.
jolly rogerParticipant@The Auburn Girl wrote:
Hey everyone calm down 🙂 I actually sorta like the kissing because I think Rumple is sexy when he kisses people. I’m a huge Rumbelle Shipper, but this doesn’t really bother me. Want to know why?
I take heart in the fact that when she kisses him, his curse does not break. That is something we must hold on to 🙂 They did not truly love one another or else his curse would have broken (as it started to with Belle). AND there is going to be a scene with Gold and Belle in which he pours his heart out to her. Looking forward to seeing how Rumple and Cora’s chemistry/story moves forward and seeing Gold with Belle.
Oh, and does anyone think Regina just MAY BE his daughter now?
I love this! I think that Regina is his daughter, but there isn’t really any proof other than them kissing. I can’t believe how good this show is though! All these new revelations and changes to the family tree just make it more interesting 😀
And there should be no worrying about Bella and Rumple. They are true love – it’s already been stated. We all have our pasts, and this was just apart of his. Remember as well, that ever since Rumple lost his son he has done nothing but manipulate others so he can get his son back. And this was just apart of that plan. 🙂jolly rogerParticipantmyril – That was a very long answer, but thank you.
I stick by what I said though. But as SpinningGold said, there are no easy answers.
Killing the leader is always wiser and they should have aimed at that in the first place. Think of historical people who had done very terrible things (I won’t name them specifically). When people realised how much damage they had done, they were forced to kill them – it was the only way.
This is what I mean. I’m not saying that it’s not alright to kill a soilder. If you must, you must. However rather than sit around and thinking about what to do while Regina or Cora becomes more powerful and causes more pain, they should’ve just planned to end them. Not only would it benefit them, it would benefit everyone.So as I said before, if they were really against murder, they would’ve done this. Because they were murdering or causing pain to innocent victims (e.g. the hunstman, Hanstel and Gretels father etc.)
jolly rogerParticipantI have been thinking the exact same thing since the last episode. I really don’t understand it either.
Jbwood5 – You make a good point. But killing is killing. Doesn’t matter the situation. And Charming and Snow are against murder (they’ve stated this multiple times).
They contradict themselves. It would be wiser to kill the leader (Cora, Regina etc.) rather than ordinary people. Once the leader is dead, their followers will step down. Therefore rather than killing many people, they only kill 1 or 2. If they were truly against murder, they would have done this in the first place, rather than run amok and let them kill innocent people.I hope this makes sense, I don’t know how else to say it.
-
AuthorPosts