Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
kfchimera
Participant@ltlbearlaw wrote:
He says, when asked if he can find Henry : “It may take some time but I’ll find him. Peter Pan never fails” (clearly meaning “I” never fail).
Except that A&E said he wasn’t speaking the third person. I can’t remember where that was now, some interview.
@Phee wrote:
This is why I’m still thinking that that particular shadow belonged to Felix. Felix’s shadow lost Bae, so Felix had to find Bae, and Felix had to compare Bae to the pic to see if he’d hit the jackpot.
Great connection with the glowing eyes being similar to the glowing hearts!
I’m not sure, since we see Felix has a shadow attached to him in the scene in the below-deck cabin with Hook. All the lost boys walk out, and their shadows reflect on the door opposite, including Felix. It’s the scene right after he tells Hook about the “rrrrripp” so, it would have been a prime moment to edit out HIS shadow verus all the other boys as they pass the door. It could be his shadow if after it is ripped, it hangs around with him unless sent to another world I guess. Sort of an assumption that after a shadow is ripped, that one no longer makes shadows.
[adrotate group="5"]“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantThat’s a good question–but I think whatever it was, GOAT may have defeated her. I thought A&E implied both the dragon and Mally were gone in some interviews/tweets they have done but I can’t remember where.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantPerhaps Smee called the lost boys, and so Hook wasn’t expecting it, but rolled with it, since the damage was done and Bae didn’t want to stay. I’m hoping we get more of the story, since Smee and Hook are not together when the curse hits, and it didn’t seem like Smee knew (rather than knew but wouldn’t tell). They never show Hook as being concerned about looking for Smee (or other crew) when he was in SB–he was sailing away alone. So I wonder, did he know they were not there, or did he not care, perhaps because Smee led a mutiny ? I’m still hoping a certain rat jumped on his ship and won’t turn up until NL 😆
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantThe Pan connection was something brought up briefly when people thought “the Pan” might be a title passed down, but I hadn’t thought of connecting the “unholy” to him–that is a clever connection there Clessidor.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantNo, I don’t think it is a “set up” but there are a lot of people who aren’t keeping track of what HAS been asked before, and who also ask some pretty obvious “it’s a future story they can’t tell us” questions. I really would prefer people could ask only those little things they’ll never show (does no one care that Henry miss so much school, and MM too!). Stuff that might give insight into the characters and world, not the future plot.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
Participant@Phee wrote:
Found those tumblr posts I mentioned in my previous post, with the gifs where Eric has been edited to look Hook-ish:
Those are hilarious. 😆
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantWell it wasnt just shipper people–you get people complaining about all kind of issues, from adoption, women’s rights, race–you name it. It’s ok to as fans maybe discuss it a little bit but the tiny little character limit on twitter prevents people from saying something of much value there without it looking like an attack at A&E /writers/actors. Some things I know they aren’t going to touch–it’s not an “issues” type drama like Good Wife or a police procedural ripped from the headlines kind of show.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantI think one reason I loved Disney’s version so much is that I had read the original as a child and it had in a way stuck with me, rankling until I saw the Disney version. You can read the original online for free–Hans Christian Anderson’s little mermaidl It has the coda version where the mermaid becomes an air spirit bound to do service for 300 years –I have seen a critic call it emotional blackmail to get kids to behave.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantColin did his best answering without giving a spoiler from within Hook’s current POV. Hook has a connection with Emma, but Regina is …well let’s just say the last time Regina had a “Romantic” relationship post-curse, it looked like Graham-toy or Glass 😯 I don’t see Hook as the Sydney Glass type you know (magical carpet to be walked all over–see he was three characters in one!) but Regina could whammy Hook magically, though I don’t see her doing THAT again. I’m not sure Regina would start anything with Henry missing like this.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
kfchimera
ParticipantGood point MysteryKat and Demileto. I liked how short the Katherine and Tamara “triangles” were. I understand them teasing for a season but this is not How I Met Henry’s Mother ! I am trying to enjoy the angst within the show but the fan drama makes me want to say give us the fairytale not the soap opera regardless of who is with who.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
-
AuthorPosts