Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@tiara_rose wrote:
Like in the movie “Hook”. When Peter go away. Somebody else get the PAN.
If that where the case. It could be that Hook and Bae was once the Pan. First Hook then Bae and now Felix.
Everyone would be right and it is logically too. 😀Interesting idea!
[adrotate group="5"]“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
I think the writers could have fun with it because Ariel is a blank slate right now in the Onceiverse. In the traditional Hans Christian Andersen version, though, the mermaid’s love is unrequited. I don’t want too many new characters as permanent recurring additions, but Ariel is an exception!
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
I could see them skipping time at some point in the series, because Henry/Jared Gilmore might hit a growth spurt. Then they would have to flashback to what happened when gone.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
We don’t have an explanation. My theory is that maybe Regina never asked for help, or her misery over losing Daniel was not something the BF could have helped.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
I think Regina’s goal was to be the happiest person in Storybrooke by taking away everyone else’s happy endings. It did not quite work out that way. I don’t think she was happy. Plus, some people who were not happy before, well they were not made even more miserable.
Ruby and Whale kind of allude to that unintended consequence in their conversation at the dock. Archie was more or less what he was before. He lost his cricketness, but now was friends with Marco without the guilt of having turned Gepetto’s parents to Puppets. Gus was now human (and until George got him) did not seem particularly miserable. Maybe he was cursed to be lactose intolerant and have pet cats, but we are not shown the obvious downside for him. Same with Johannna (until Cora got her)–looked like she had a fancy house behind her so maybe her curse was to have servants rather than be one? Then there is Dr. Whale. He was no longer tragically mourning his brother. Ruby lost her loving relationship with Granny, but she was no longer a feared werewolf.
George/Spencer and Sydney/Genie were kind of allies to Regina, and were not happy before in FTL. They did not seem to have an ironic fate in store for them either in pre-Emma Storybrooke.
The people who did not go to Storybrooke were saved because they happened to be in Cora’s anti-curse bubble. Regina would have taken them too otherwise.
Anyway it is kind of funny to think what the writers might have chosen for other characters.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
@Faux Pax wrote:
I saw this theory on Tumblr and I wish I could find the original post because it explained it so much better then i can. Pretty much what it said was that BF fell in love with a man and tried to make him immortal so that he would live as long as she did and whatever she did resulted in him being the first dark one. It would help explain why she was so against Nova and Dreamy being together. She understood how dangerous it was (at least in her mind) for fairy to fall in love.
I like that theory–anything that gives new meaning to filler episodes–make them plot hole fillers.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
@MysteryKat25 wrote:
Depends on how they handle it but I could see both being intriguing.
Absolutely! As Rumpel said to the Seer, “pesky details” make a big difference. Just look at what they did with Greg. I thought he was just going to be some trouble making random, but his connection to the town and Regina’s character is heartbreaking.
If they introduce Pan, I bet they will weave it in a way that impacts more than just one charcter’s development, regardless if he is Neal, Killian or his own unique self.“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
Does he want to expose them? Far as he knows, no one can get into that town. I imagine he has spent years driving down that road trying to break the barrier. Remember, at the moment he broke through, Rumpel and Belle were standing ON the line, like keeping a door open. So he is probably doubtful about getting outside help. He probably wants to figure out exactly what he is dealing with, so he can find his father and get out safely. The other thing, he is a sci-fi fan (star wars ring tone) so maybe he is thinking they are aliens or something. Even seeing Regina levitate things might make him think of the “force” rather than magic. Similar I suppose but magic is crazier!
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
Wasn’t the actress playing Tamara on Walking Dead too? I thought I read that.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
@craxyfox wrote:
Those look like “Tamara bagels” on the cream cheese containers
I’m withhdolding judgement for now!What does that even mean?
I was hoping Tamara would be a normal real world person so we could get some comic reactions here and there in the show to the whole idea of fairytale characters. Kurt/Emma/Owen–it all changed too quickly and got too serious and scary by the time they knew there was magic and fairytale characters (if Kurt and Owen even knew that).Anyway, I can’t tell much from those pictures. But I doubt all the writers have planned for Tamara is just a convenient reason for Neal to ride off into the sunset and out of the lives of Emma, Henry and Rumpel.
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn't be. And what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?” -- Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland & Through the Looking-Glass
