Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@MagicKingdomღ wrote:
He looks fine to me. Robert’s always been pretty skinny, so his appearance isn’t out of the ordinary. He’s also 51, so it’s not like he’s going to look as young and healthy as he did when he was a young man.
even as a young men… I don’t recall him ever looking… well… actually, he didn’t change that much did he? I mean the hair grew out, we have a nice salt&pepper thing going on right now in the beard… but aside from that, he seems… unchanged.
If he is in poor health, his body is not betraying him right now…
[adrotate group="5"]@TheGoldenKey wrote:
Marilou, I am francophone and fluent in both french and English. French is my mother tongue so I’m well versed in the language. ]The french have 3 different words for the same adjective “my”: mon, ma, mes. All are a possessive adjective of the 1st person. Mon is used when it’s singular masculine; ma is used when it’s singular feminine; and mes is used when it’s plural either masculine or feminine. The use of any of the three possessive adjectives will never change the definition of a word, it will only reflect the sing/plural & masc/fem. of the word it is attributed to. .
I love how you say that as if I wasn’t french myself 😉 I’m a montreal all the way, through and through. born and raised on Le Plateau. (si tu vien pas de mon coin de pays, la derniere phrase a perdue toute sa valeur…)
as I was trying to make the matter simpler for our english speaking friend I think I made it worst… something got lost in translation I guess (badum tssss!!!)
and I have to disagree in some context, some words are always plural… Like “voeux de mariage”
anyhoot, we’ll find out for sure only when the episode airs.!
EDIT: btw… I don’t know if I read that right in your previous post, if I didn’t, please ignore the following few sentences.
there is no such thing as masculine/plural with a possessive adjective! mon chevaux – mon jouets – mon livres
@Beauty & the Beast wrote:
@MagicKingdomღ wrote:
@Beauty & the Beast wrote:
I wonder if we’ll ever see another Dark One on the show? Either past or present? I’d prefer to see the ones from the past. If we were to get a new Dark One, that would mean that Rumpel was killed…and…I just…*Wipes Tears from Eye* 😥
I’m anxious to learn more about Zoso. I mean…the man was suicdal for God’s sake. 😯 I hope that isn’t foreshadowing for what will happen to Rumpel’s character.
Possibly. But I’m not exactly sure how that would play out. Killing Rumpel would kill a large portion of the plot, so that’s not an option. But I am interested in exploring the mythology behind the Dark One. Who was the original Dark One? Why can’t he be truly destroyed?
I hate to burst your bubble guys but I have my doubts that it’s gonna happen. The show already has a large mythology going on and we don’t want another LOST- type disaster would we? (people kept asking about the island before the crash and when the writers finally gave that story to the viewer it only raised more questions and frustration for everyone involved.) it’s a vicious circle.
@TheGoldenKey wrote:
@AntBee wrote:
I just saw that Mark Isham put this on his Instagram,
1. Cora does Hook a favor? Probably related to Belle I’m guessing.
2. Cora and Hook hit the town.
3. Main Title (The Cricket Game?)
4. Sore Loser (Present day or could be flashback with Regina being the sore loser in the flashback?)
5. Regina Is Captured (Also could be present day or flashback or perhaps both?)
6. My Wishes (Whose wishes?)
7. Regina parties… (Maybe Archie doesn’t die if Regina is partying. I think Josephine might be hanging around me too much because I read a theory that she wrote at Fan Forums using the impostor idea. It might be too much like what happened with Kathryn, but if they’re going for another murder mystery already after Gus Gus’s murder just happened, then I think it’s possible that they could do another fake out by having someone seem like he/she was murdered but not really. This time Cora makes everyone think that Regina killed Archie only to have him pop again but really be Cora in disguise. Whether the real Archie is dead or not would be something that fans would have to wait and see about.)
8. Trying t…Some messed up french there for #6. Voeux can also mean “vows”. Someone perhaps made a vow to get even with someone? Just to note that the adjective my in french is different based on singular or plural. It should have been either “Mon” Voeu (singular) or “Mes” Voeux (plural) but not “Mon” Voeux.
with “mon”, which is a possessive adjective, voeux means wishes, not vows. For it to mean vow it would have to be put with mes, les… etc. but there is a grammatical mistake that could throw the whole thing off anyway. See, mon is a singular possessive adjective, so technically, the noun would be also singular “voeu” without the x at the end (x signifying plural). (I sorta just re-read your post and just realized you had already written everything I just said but SCREW IT! I’m posting anyway!)
so lets just assume that the scene was originally called “My Wishes” since when you run “my vows” through a generic translator it gives you mes voeux (for once google translate did not fail at grammar).
so we have actual wishes, like the ones that are granted by genies (maybe sydney is back… maybe he’s is the one dying and not archie) it would make sense since I heard he was busy with another show anyway… let’s trim the fat!
