Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
[adrotate group="5"]
I think Bae being Henry’s father will prevent Rumpel from harming the Charmings. I have a feeling that’s the writers are going to do. In order to lessen the threat Rumpel that poses to the Charmings, they’re going to connect them through Henry.
@TheDarkOne wrote:
^I thought the spoiler said that Regina stole something from Rumpel’s shop. He didn’t give it to her.
You beat me to it. I was just about to post that. 😆
I mostly agree, except I doubt Rumpel would give Regina any magic. I think their relationship is pretty dead in the water right now. Regina probably regains her powers from her mother’s old spell book.
I also agree that Regina will have trouble regaining her powers at first. The magic that Rumpel released into Storybrooke was created from true love, so she may end up being the only who isn’t able to use it. Regina’s true love is dead, and I don’t see Henry warming up to her anytime soon.
^Yeah, I think you’re right. It was definitely Maine. Unless, Emma managed to get into troube in another place. But as far as we know, it was Maine.
Yeah, I read about those spoilers too. I wouldn’t be surprised if the show turns that storyline into a love triangle either.
@Lil’Red wrote:
@slurpeez108 wrote:
Wow, not sure what I wrote to set off such a strong reaction or to garner such sarcasm. I was merely making a connection between the title for 2×6 and that line from 1×4. I had only a very vague memory of it and had to re-watch that scene again today to check exactly what Regina said. Not everyone would have remembered that line if they, like me, hadn’t watched that episode recently. I thought it was an interesting and relevant comment to make. I don’t see why I even have to make any sort of defence, but I just did. Good grief.
Guess I just read the comment as HIGHLY condescending – like this reply. I’m not sorry. If it had been phrased to be conversational or in anyway pleasant, I’m sure I would have replied in some amount of excitement about the episode. I’m here for discussion, Slurpeez. Not to be rude, unpleasant, condescending, or sarcastic (at least not at the expense of others). If you can say the same thing, I have absolutely no problems with you but apparently have a hard time deciphering tone in your posts.
I honestly don’t think she said anything offensive or sarcastic. There wasn’t a single thing in her original post that was rude or condescending. Like…nothing. Did you two have a misunderstanding in another thread and it’s spilling over into this one? 🙁
