Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@slurpeez108 wrote:
I love the guy eating the carrot. He didn’t have any dialogue at all but just his expression during that scene, 😆 😆 made his appearance my favorite moment of the whole episode.
[adrotate group="5"]@Lissy wrote:
I could just picture him limping in a rage to Regina to beat her with his cane.
I hope Gold reacts that way, now that you mention it. 😆 But I don’t want to see him locked up again 🙁
I wish I could go to these fan events too. Sadly, RL keeps me busy. 🙁 I’d love to go to SDCC one day.
@hjbau wrote:
We see Regina fixing the phone records in Ep 14 so maybe she plants some more evidence in this episode as well to either accuse David or Mary about Kathryn’s disappearance.
Was that what that scene was? 😮 I guess, I shouldn’t be surprised. But wow 😯 Regina is truly 😈
@slurpeez108 wrote:
The last we saw of Snow White in the fairytale world, she had erased her own memories. When will you pick up that story again?
Kitsis: [This Sunday’s episode] takes place right after the Huntsman released her, so before she’s attained all her banditry skills. In fact, there’s a scene you’ll see, where Red (Meghan Ory) teaches her how to track. Episode 16 [picks] up directly after the episode where she drank the poison.That’s I figured because Snow's cape in the preview is the same one she wore in the woods with the huntsman in 'The Heart is a Lonely Hunter.'
@hjbau wrote:
That was gruesome. That is crazy that she picked Mary Margaret. I wonder why she picked those names? Like are they her mother’s name or what? That makes me wonder about their names in the real world.
Actually,
The name “Mary Margaret” is from a real-life woman believed to be the inspiration of the Snow White character named “Maria Sophia Margaretha Catharina Freifräulein von Erthal” (born on June 15, 1729 in Germany.)
and Blanchard obviously means ‘White’ in French.
I actually read the official description of the episode awhile back.
What caught my attention is the mention of a 'Peter.' It didn't click right away about who this 'Peter' might be and then I connected, Peter+Wolf, and OMG! Is it Peter from the opera, Peter and the Wolf? If it is, that is a brilliant connection!
@weedith wrote:
Maybe no magical creature is allowed to have love. Maybe that’s a strictly human thing. There were certainly going to be major consequences for Rumple if he allowed himself to love — he would have lost his magic altogether. I might be mistaken but I seem to recall somebody saying that love is the most powerful magic of all. (Did I dream that?) Maybe you can either have one or the other, but not both. EQ had magic but no love. And didn’t Maleficent lose her love? I don’t know. Just shows there is a lot more to this show than it seems at first glance. (Which is why I love it!)
I wish I could remember who said that. but good observation. 😀
😀