Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Crystal Princess
ParticipantThere’s a Live Action little Mermaid though but I don’t think it’s Disney
[adrotate group="5"]I don't cause commotions, I am one.
Crystal Princess
ParticipantCompletely recommend Alethea Kontis. Enchanted did go a little crazy towards the end but Hero was fantastic from start to finish.
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
Crystal Princess
ParticipantRuby/Elsa
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
Crystal Princess
ParticipantLike I’m a bit confused tbh… does this mean I can write ReditGo? lol
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
Crystal Princess
ParticipantDo the ship rules apply to characters that aren’t currently in popular ships?
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
Crystal Princess
ParticipantNot a fan of having a mopey/angry Regina for most of the next season. Some tension between Emma/Regina again might be good but… urgh I feel like they’re throwing away so much development. Like I totally understand that they need to show how she deals with loss now to show that she’s changed but they could at least show it not destroying her so much.
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
Crystal Princess
ParticipantElsa could be another one of Will’s angry exes 🙂
It’s possible that Will’s backstory ties in with Elsa in a way we haven’t seen yet. Perhaps Elsa was accidentally responsible for the death of his sister, or failed to save her somehow. Maybe Anastasia was named after Elsa’s Anna like we have Neal junior. Who knows.
It is going to be confusing having two Annas on the show tho.
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
May 16, 2014 at 12:16 pm in reply to: Out in Storybrooke: Who should have a Queery Tale romance? #270119Crystal Princess
ParticipantI pretty much agree with most everything Myril has said.
I feel like between stepping up the Swanqueen subtext in recent eps(a ship they won’t let sail but won’t let die either – “keep watching”, bugger off A&E) and the Mulan stuff OUAT has already very much done things the “wrong” way. I feel being 3 seasons in and dealing with the themes OUAT does not having a single unambiguously queer character is actually pretty shameful.
One thing I DO want to add is that it is absolutely wrong and offensive to treat queer romance as something that you have to spend 3+ seasons figuring out, that you have to “get around to” that has to be done “the right way”, whereas we can have problematic relationships like Rumbelle as of the finale until the Unicorns come home. Queer people are not aliens. While it is certainly true that straight people are not going to fully understand the subtleties of being queer and doing queer romance, just about anyone can have two dudes or two women have a romantic relationship just like a man and a dude and have it be passable. If you’re not trying to do commentary on LGBT issues, just be inclusive, it’s absolutely not that difficult to do. While I dislike when it’s glossed over – having a character just randomly mention having or looking for a partner of the same sex/gender, or hell drop that they’re trans, is not hard to do. And you can just continue on then – having a queer character you can take your time expanding on.
The concept of the “Checklist” too – again this is insanely heteronormative. We need no excuse for yet another straight cis white couple. As far as I’m concerned, EVERYTHING EVER with a sizeable cast of characters should contain at least one queer character. There is centuries of exclusion to make up for in fiction, even if you had nothing but queer romances in all fiction for a year it would barely make a dent. Straight people have so much more to draw on. The talk of putting in a queer character “just for the sake of it” being wrong is really horrible to me, because first off you should be able to include queer characters without even thinking about it, if you’re not then something’s up and frankly it’s better to go to a conscience effort to fix that than not.
So that’s the thing that offends me most about the attitudes in this show and that I find in fandoms in general.
Uhara, a character some people regard as Tokenism, made a HUGE difference to empowering young black women.
Of course I don’t want a “token” character, I want an actual well fleshed out character and there is zero reason why A&E can’t hire a queer writer(or even have Jane Espensen write).
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
May 15, 2014 at 10:33 pm in reply to: Out in Storybrooke: Who should have a Queery Tale romance? #269998Crystal Princess
ParticipantNo one!!!! These are Fairy Tales not Glee if you want that kind of stuff what Glee they have several on that show and others this doesn’t need to be in in Fairy Tales.
So in other words, queer people don’t deserve a happy ending?
That’s probably one of the most hateful and depressing things I’ve read on here, I already get that feeling a lot but to see it said outright is just :/
I’m going to cry now. I just found out about a transgirl in my extended circle who killed herself a few days ago.
Feeling pretty sad and angry about everything and how people like me are treated.
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
May 15, 2014 at 10:31 pm in reply to: Out in Storybrooke: Who should have a Queery Tale romance? #269997Crystal Princess
ParticipantI Really think it’s important to remember that there is no one way to be queer and that “Loud” queers do exist and shouldn’t be shamed. Some overly camp gay guys do grate on me a bit, but so do lots of other sorts of people.
I don't cause commotions, I am one.
-
AuthorPosts