Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Morning!!!!
They didn’t even have to retain MRJ, they could have written him a life off-screen.
Yeah, especially bc they have all this curses and lost of memories, they could like have Neal going to pick his things, then have an acident and lose his memories, that would explain, why not going back to SB after and start a life somewhere.
Or they could do like the people from The vampire diaries did to Elena, when Nina left the show, they did a mix of Philip soul storyline with harry potter and voldemort storyline, that was: Bonnie was dead and in order to save her, to bring her back, Elena did a spell in which she linked her life to bonnie, and therefore falling into a deep dead spleep( that could not be broke with TLK by the way), so in doing so the spell says that while Bonnie lives Elena cant wake up( and bonnie cant kill herself, she had to die on natural causes or be killed), so elena is like dead. So they put her on a coffin on a cript and will look for a way to save her without bonnie dying, that was the solution TVD did in order to let go Nina and on the last season of the show in the last episodes they may bring her back to be saved. See this is not that dificult to do on ouat, putting like while rumple is alive neal cant live, this is possible to have been used, especially with the amount of curses, they even had excuse to simply not remenber to save neal, or not mention him, bc there was nothing that at the moment they could not do.
On a side note about MRJ tweet to Sean, he still didnt answer MRJ even tho he faved and tweeted several things, if this is not a proof of a no MRJ talk rule in OUAT cast, i dont know what it is, especially bc Sean appears to be such “Friend” of MRJ and especially if we take into account what MRJ told sean, in a normal no speaking with or about mRJ rule, Sean would answer this like right away, especially bc he was tweeting to fans and people and fav stuff all day.
https://twitter.com/MRaymondJames/status/655091698473828353
Are moments like this i get more angry with the cast, crew, and everyone involved in the show. And even with MRJ, bc he must learn by now, that he should simply let ouat people go, and start by unfollowing them all, still not sure what interest he has in them, i mean he unfollowed ouat twiter account, means no interrest in ouat at all, so cut the ties and move on and start following more people from his new show.Sorry the rant, like i said the show doesnt bother me, are the people involve on it that upsets me.
[adrotate group="5"]"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
I’m quite positive Sean Maguire is the only OUAT Cast Member who hasn’t forgotten MRJ!
It maybe brief but at least he’s mentioned.
Saw that at least until the MRJ part, but must say that MRJ tweeted Sean and so far he didn’t said anything back, I say he may not be allowed, even tho Sean already faved tweets after that and even fav a tweet from a fan that was an answer to the tweet MRJ tweeted Sean.
Is my opinion, but I do believe there is not only a anti nealfire, but also a anti MRJ rule imposed by ABC , where they can’t talk with MRJ in public unless they allowed( they don’t want to remember the fans that MRJ was in the show and that he was Neal and maybe they think Neal is hated so is better not to mention MRJ, bc in their mind with Neal being hated is better not associate the show with him and Neal )is not normal that they all praise ex cast members projects in public, some even live tweeting the ex cast members shows,yet with MRJ they pretend he was never on the show and not even congrat him on his projects and when they talk about him, is bc of PR that involves ouat, is not with feeling, ok with the other cast menbers may also be PR, but they talk about cast menbers that are actually loved or at least not so much in ship wars like MRJ is, even tho Jamie dornan could be involved on it, but then again he is hot according to the fans, so he doesnt get hate.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
Morning!!!
I sent this to @Josephine, bc she is my Minion !!
But also thought in @RG, for her baby sheldon
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
[quote=310029]Okay, I know we’ve discussed this many, many times, but do you think this absolute ban on any mention of Nealfire comes from the Trolls, ABC, and/or Disney??? It’s extremely obvious now what they’re doing. It’s become a bit of a joke about how can they pretend Bae never existed. The sad thing is that most of us we’re not angry at this because of SwanFire. Neal had importance, significant importance, outside of Emma. So you erase Neal, you screw up Rumple’s story, too. If they do go the Underword to save Hook, it will anger many Neal fans, but they really don’t care. They think we’re such a small portion of the viewing public. I’m at the point it’s not even Hook I hate, but the show runners and writers. They don’t care enough to craft a consistent story so why should I care enough to be invested in it.
[/quote]
That is my problem now, is not the show, but how the fandom, the writers and cast simply erased Neal from the story and in doing that they pretend MRJ was never there, is not normal that they congrat and support ex cast menbers projects and after MRJ left the show they never had a word of congrats on your new job, or how most of the cast didnt even rt the PSA.
The show at this point is mockable and the people that say the show is great, is only saying it bc they are being fan pandering, the biggest problem for me is the people involved in the ouat simply treat MRJ bad, when that is the case, certain types of fans, think that is good that they do the same, even now that MRj is no longer in the show, has better things and thank god simply moved on.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
Have to post this here, Me, @Ranisha and @heather( since she knows more about fireman, LOL) will save you all!!!!!
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
Just went to Tumblr and saw that crap spoilers bc someone didnt tag the spoilers as spoilers and because of that my block program didnt blocked ouat spoilers.
My 1st reaction
My 2nd reaction:
I dont even know what to say, well besides if this is meant to show Emma and Hook as fate and always meant to meet, or that somehow Hook is a hero and maybe even heir to camelot, not sure how , but hey is OUAT comes with no sense, No one cant tell me this is not last season, let be real many people wont be happy, many are already saying they wont see and i dont see the GA coming back to see 11 or 12 epis on S5B to see all characters being happy, or at least knowing they will all be happy, even if they go to underworld,bc really is boring, that u know no one will die for real, they will all be happy, etc, etc, etc.
How i imagine GA on S5B:
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
I totally agree with @ Ranisha, in everything she said, even on the fever, lol.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
Carter and June bts pic
https://instagram.com/p/8yr-92GZTA/
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
@Rainbow – That just sounds like another CS attempt to explain away the obvious: CS =/= true love.
Truth, but even if all clues point to something, again we are talking about OUAT, and like @RG said before, they came a long way on CS, to not make them TL now, they will make some explanation about how TLK didnt worked before and works now, bc they wont ent with Emma single, they wont do SQ, they wont make SF or bring back Neal, MRJ moved on, they wont bring another love interest and they wont kill Emma for good, so Cs is the only option left. They dont even have to explain things, bc media and fans love CS, so as long they end together fans and media will make their own headcanon that the writers will go along.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
Now that I think about it, one really bizarre bit of dialogue was Head!Rumple’s reaction to Emma and Hook’s conversation, where he says something about Emma crushing Hook’s heart. Head!Rumple’s interpretation of how that encounter went seems totally off to me — if anything, Hook was the one doing the crushing (whether Dark Emma cares is another question). So either the writers have just lost all grip on reality — which I wouldn’t be too surprised about, considering how many people are cheering Hook’s “resistance” to Emma’s “advances” (cue eye roll) — or they are applying a mass production approach to episode writing, where different people are ghostwriting different parts of the episode. Either way, it’s weird.
Have to say that the quote from Rumple is already part of some theory from Cs fans where they say that means emma crushed hook heart to cast the curse to take them to SB and he is sharing her heart bc they are TL. Even tho makes no sense, bc in that case TLK would have worked, but hey is OUAT, doesnt have to make sense.
"I offended you with my opinion? Ha, you should hear the ones I keep to myself".
