Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
[adrotate group="5"]"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
More MAP almost certainly means more present-day EF and more Neal.
I think my comment got lost in the page turn, but I think they might be getting ready to shoot for 304. We know its a Rumple episode which might mean Neal centric as well.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"No desire to watch this at all.
The SyFy one will be excellent because it’s SyFy so it will either be genuinally excellent or so terrible that it automatically becomes excellent. Those are the only possible options for anything on SyFy.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Don’t really like that PP idea either, lol. Seems wrong, especially after August’s deaging was met with such hostility and anger.
Lancelot: nope. Adam has confirmed on Twitter that Lance is not retuning, that the rumors that he might be were just rumors. They do not intend to bring him back for the first half.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Alrighty then! My guess is 304 which we know is Rumple based, so it’s not stretching it too far to think that it might also be Neal.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Ok, see this is what happens when I don’t read the entire article because my brain is exploding with firework-esque confusion.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"The fact it pulled into harbor is what bothers me. If they were shooting boat scenes in NL, they could do it out in the open water. I don’t know why it would be docked unless 1) OUATinWL (which makes the timeline go to heck in a handbasket) or 2) the JR6 came home early? Which makes no sense. There has to be another option.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Ben Linus was my favorite character as well and I fought anybody who tried to write him off as a cliche black-hat bad guy. And I think we all know how I feel about Rumple. The thing with LOST and OUAT is that they’ve made the “bad guys” incredibly complex. Ben comes off as a bad guy but then you learn about his tragic (very very tragic) past and that He was never that special to the point where Jacob didn’t even really know that he exited. Ben’s confrontation with Jacob at the statue and his “what about me?” speech broke my heart Good guys are expected to be good and that gets old because they set impossible standards–though OUAT and LOST both show how the good guys can also have darker hearts with Snow and Jack, respectively. In our age in TV we humanize the bad guys and make them the most relatable. Look at some of the most popular TV character currently: Rumple, Sherlock (a high functioning sociopath), Loki (from the Avengers movies), Tyrion Lanister from GoT (somewhat immoral but oh so smart), and the list goes on. All of them are somehow “damaged” and that’s how we relate to them.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
