Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yeah keeping it until the season finale (or 520…521) makes the most sense to keep the timeline not…stupid.
[adrotate group="5"]"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Also, if they’re announcing this early, I’d wager he’s in episode 1 or 2 along with the rest of the Camelot-crew
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"One of my favorite things about Wonderland was that Will and Alice had a significant friendship–and one of my least favorite things about his turn on OUAT is that the writers didn’t find a way to use Will ‘s story but just went for Soap Opera 101, put him in a love triangle.
I’ve decided that Will was never on OUAT. It just never happened.
the way this show is written, well, sometimes its best not to think so hard when the writers don’t even bother to explain some of the apparent contradictions in how characters behave.
The show would really like for to not think at all. It just wants us to be buzzy and tweet (with hashtags of course!) and to keep watching. It wants us to be so caught up in the shiny of it all that we don’t stop to ponder what they’re actually saying, doing, and showing
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Either flashback or he was never dead–though I rather hope it’s flashback and not present day.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"The only way that works is if there is another time jump. A rather big one.
ETA: wait do they mean S5 (the whole thing) or S5A?
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Morning. I’ll be out of the house most of today, but hope everyone has a good Friday 🙂
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Technically JMo just clarified that Emma’s sacrifice was for the entire town, not just Regina. Something SwanQueens weren’t exactly too thrilled about having their grand moment taken away
And THAT is the biggest problem with OUAT. What is said vs what is shown. They often are completly out of line. Show don’t tell. The showed Emma sacrificing herself for Regina because Regina worked too hard to get her happy ending taken away. They showed Emma and Regina trading very long looks while the blackness took Emma. They showed Emma in Charming’s clothes and Regina in Snow’s. They showed all season long that Emma considers her and Regina to be alike in many way. That’s what they keep doing. So yeah, I’d have some Swen questions too after a whole season of bait.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Whether or not it’s canon shouldn’t matter. They are a part of this fanbase. A HUGE part of it–probably the biggest part. If YNB wants to ignore the questions, she is well within her rights to do so. But bashing them as a whole–because lo and behold not all SQers are BA’s, just like all CSers are not BAs nor all SFers–was wrong and immature.
And whether or not it’s canon doesn’t matter since its the story that is being played on screen. After an entire season in which they were baited to the hilt, I’d have questions too. I’d want to know some stuff. I’d want some answers as well. It will never be romantic on screen but that doesn’t mean that the SQ ship–friendship or otherwise–can be so blatantly ignored after it was played to so heavily for an entire year.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Dark Emma will be interesting for CS as TLK should theoretically break the curse since Emma would retain her memories and feelings (since Rumple did), however, Dark Emma can’t be solved too soon otherwise where’s the show which means a CS TLK likely won’t work so where would that leave CS?
It will work and it’ll happen in 511, which (unless they do a weird number thing) will be the 100th episode, a very big episode. Then the second half of S5 is something new–like it has been for two years now.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"
