Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
[adrotate group="5"]
Maybe we’ll actually get a proper “origin” story for Robin Hood this season…..after he’s dead. Sigh.
I assumed he was the boy with the straw hat in Snow’s class, but could be wrong?
Yes, that must have been him – good catch. They must be planning on showing his backstory later this season, right? That would be the first time we got the backstory of a child in present-day since Hansel and Gretel in Season 1.
<iframe id=”twitter-widget-0″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ allowtransparency=”true” allowfullscreen=”true” class=”twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered” style=”position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: block; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none;”></iframe>
<p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>@ordinarycollege different fathers. If you watch, should be clear. OUATWL remains canon.
— Adam Horowitz (@AdamHorowitzLA) October 17, 2016
<script async=”” src=”//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>
<iframe id=”twitter-widget-1″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ allowtransparency=”true” allowfullscreen=”true” class=”twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered” style=”position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: block; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none;”></iframe>
<p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>@ordinarycollege not quite. #nospoilers
— Adam Horowitz (@AdamHorowitzLA) October 17, 2016
<script async=”” src=”//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>
Wondering what he’s hinting at?
What were the questions asked of Adam for these answers? I can’t seem to find them.
Person under the hood is Robin. Calling it now.
But what would be the reason for Robin to kill Emma? Further character assassination?
With just a little tweaking this entire story could have still been told along with what we were lead to elieve with wonderland.
They could have just had the flashbacks take place after the ball, after Cinderella had married the prince and after Anastatia had run off with will. We would never have to see Ana, Will, or Wonderland, and the story would still only have required one stepsister (in this case, it would have been Drizella) and it could have been the exact same story about her finding her happy ending after both her sisters had found theirs. Tremaine could have tried to stop her since she expresses resentment over not getting her happy ending ad it would have went the exact same route only with a few minor adjustments.Guys. Seriously. I can write circles around this show.
They definitely could have told Clorinda’s story while keepin Ana’s established, but not exactly the way they wanted to with Ella With Ella already married, they’d need to have Lady Tremaine get the secret from Cinderella some other more creative way, since the glass slippers would no longer be important. Perhaps Ella could still betray her stepsister, but in exchange for information on Thomas’wherabouts from Lady Tremaine, provided all this was happening after the final flashback scene in 1×04.
– I didn’t realize Violet was showing up before 6×09. Did we know this?
– I like the idea of American folklore in the show – We’ve now had a Rip Van Winkle shout out in 4A and deleted scene in 3A, the Paul Bunyan storybook page from 5×23, and now this. Color me intrigued.
There was also the fancy horse drawn carriage featured in the “Heart of Stone” title card – something that never actually appeared in the episode if I recall correctly, so it couldn’t have been referring to something else like a generic carriage in my opinion.
So disappointing they’re not following through with the Cinderella hints with Ana. I wish A & E would just level with us and admit that was their original intent and plan and that they just changed their minds. I still wouldn’t like it, but at least I wouldn’t feel like they’re insulting their audience’s intelligence. The tiny, tiny bone they threw us was naming the stepsisters something else. There’s at least a sliver of hope they’ll still bring back Ana at some point.
