Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
[adrotate group="5"]
– I could understand why killing Regina or Rumple would work for their respective total redemptions-
I really don’t get that Redemption Equals Death trope. I find it really disturbing to say the least. I hope Rumpel or Regina won’t have to die in order to being redeemed. If they must die I don’t want it to be for that reason. Please writers you can do better than that.
One of the best things about the episode is the developing relationship between Henry and Gold. It is the very lovely nature of their relationship, however, that haunts the end of the episode, however, and I anticipate that it will lead to much speculation on the Internet come Sunday night.
And Regina’s encounter with Belle may wind up being very costly to all the residents of Storybrooke.
Now I feel bad. Cora and Regina will get the dagger and control Rumpel. Cora will force him to do something grim to Henry, kidnap or… kill him. And Rumpel will be the real big bad they talked about. After all was said and done he will become totally evil. Dagger or not. This saddens me so much, I don’t know if I want to see the episode anymore. Or the rest of the show at all.
Oh boy what this show is doing to me 😥
By the way I have a theory on how Rumpel get his leg’s injury: what if, while he ran off the Ogre War to come back to his house, why if he stepped on a wold trap? I’m not if it is the right word, you know that jaw like metallic thing?
Oh ok, get it, sorry.
.I think the seer told him something about the saviors(Emma)’s child…that essentially if Rumple reconciled with Bae that the saviors child would face a grim fate (whatever that may be)…the follow up question that Rumple didn’t ask (one of the reviews said he should have asked a follow up question)…was who is the father of the child. He is going to find out he put his grandson in harms way to reconcile with his son. Or at least that’s my best guess for now.
If it’s the case, poor poor Rumpel. My heart will not survive that episode, I tell you that 😥
@jessista wrote:
As for Henry–perhaps he has magic like Emma? Oooh–since the Queen had to kill “the thing she loved most”=Henry Sr., to enact the curse, perhaps young Henry must be sacrificed to undo it? After all, if the curse had never happened, Henry never would have come into existence. Then again, I can’t see Disney killing off a kid–so maybe he’s the “key” in some other way?.
Wait, you’ve lost me here, doesn’t Emma already broke the curse? So why Henry should be sacrificed to undo it?
@Phee wrote:
It would be quite fitting, I mean, the guy picked up spinning as a hobby from somewhere.
Wow I didn’t thought of that, well done. About the spinning, It wasn’t solely a hobby but his job as well.
Don’t want to sound too harsh here but please, can we let that “which one is more evil” thing out of that great forum?
I mean it is really annoying now. That question have been asked again and again and debated with passion all over the net.
To answer you, neither of them as more evil nore good than the other
Thank you very much Surayya. That’s reassuring now, it means that Emma will not lie to Gold about Neal being his son (if Neal is really Rumpel son that it) if Neal accept to talk to him (even if only for 3 minutes.
@Phee wrote:
We know that Nealfire stipulates that the conversation with Rumple only last for 3 minutes, which means that he isn’t keen to talk to him at all.
What? WHAT?? Where? How that? Where it is? Where it is? Tell me! Where?
Here you go my mental health, bye bye… 😕
