Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
spinninggoldParticipant
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Sorry, forgot what else I was gonna say…. 😥
[adrotate group="5"]spinninggoldParticipantI get breaking the season in two or something like that. But the airing of Once is so erratic that nobody knows when the next episode will be, unless you are a very dedicated viewer. And that is gonna lose the show viewers. People that automatically tune in each week, and then find their show isn’t there will be disappointed. I mean we are the fanatics, and will put Once night with big bold letters in our diary ( and put a pretty border of hearts and flowers around it) But if I weren’t this inversted in the show, just kinda liked it, I think the erratic schedule would mean I would miss at least half of it, and then you miss part of the story and because everything is linked in Once, the series gets less interesting, My mom watches too and she will be like: Who’s that? during an episode …and she saw all the episodes, only in double tempo, which was a bit too much sometimes.
spinninggoldParticipant@ItachiIshtar wrote:
Sunday, March 31st – Episode 209 – “Queen of Hearts” (Rebroadcast, but interestingly listed as “Specially Enhanced”. Wonder what that could mean?)
Well that’s Easter, so with Queen of Hearts… Alice in Wonderland, does that mean we will have the White Rabbit hiding easter eggs?… That would be fun! Eddie & Adam, make it happen!
And yes Phee, hiatus is a dirty dirty word.
spinninggoldParticipantIt’s their own fault for hiding so many spoilers that we go and play Sleuth. And we all want to be the first to discover something.
spinninggoldParticipantThank you, all I was worried about is Bailee looking online what we say, coming across a post like this, and getting insecure. Just think about what your actions might achieve. and that goes for all of us. I wasn’t try to attack you, but to warn you. So I am sorry too if you feel attacked
spinninggoldParticipantNo easy answers indeed, and that is what creates the problem, because OuaT seems to take a position that murder is bad and changes people, but forget that their character already killed and made a conscious choice in this.
Snow CHOSE to attack king Henry’s castle and so she chose the death of the soldiers she attacked. Anyways, Regina constantly attacks Snow so she has every right to kill her, and it might even be the smart thing to do.
Fact is killing changes people but Snow has already done so. It IS a moral question whether to kill someone or not, but I think the death Snow already caused is sweeped under the carpet too lightly. I’m glad I’m not the only one who feels this way.
I think the moral question Adam & Eddie want to raise is about redemption and what it means to take someone’s life, but they easily stepped around the concept what it means to kill in a war situation, which is just as traumatizing and changes people. I hope they will show later that they have thought about it, but right now it doesn’t look like it.
And that’s why at least I am a bit upset. Because there should not be a difference in killing Cora or a soldier. It’s a human life, and one is just as important as the other. That is the ONLY answer, as far as I am concerned. And I get the feeling it is overlooked, to create a storyline.
I sure hope I am wrong.spinninggoldParticipantPlan a trip to Stevenson? I’m sure there are forums (fora?) that keep an eye on when they are there… Might be a spur of the moment thing though.
spinninggoldParticipantI’m so with you on this one, I actually mentioned it in Ponderings & Wonderings in the general forum. As she tries to free Charming from the castle I see her slash her sword to an innocent soldier (well, sorta…point is, they are people too, with families…well, fictional people).. And that is not murder, but killing Regina or Cora is?
Double standards if you ask me.spinninggoldParticipantI stand by what I say, dude… Yes you toned it down in your post, but your openingsline still stands. Personally, I don’t think you should have even mentioned it in the first place. And I think we need to protect these child actors, they are still kids. The grown-ups can fend for themselves, but when it comes to the kids, let them be, don’t critize them. How would you feel if a stranger out of no where started judging your behaviour? We are talking about impressionable young children, and they should be stimulated, so they feel sure of themselves… Not become insecure and full of self-doubt, because someone on the internet is of the opinion they gave a lousy performance. I don’t want Bailee Madison to be wondering “Am I overdoing this”, next time she is on set, I wanna see her act her heart out, because she does it so wonderfully.
We should leave it up to the director to guide them in that, and after that, that’s it, it’s done.Appreciate the performance given, don’t pick the actors apart. And think twice before you critize them, they are people too, and they have feelings. Else we are nothing more than bullies.
spinninggoldParticipantobisgirl that’s a great find!
-
AuthorPosts