- This topic has 25,813 replies, 124 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
At least they’re actually showing the fallout of Robin’s death and how it’s affecting Regina. It seems that they’ve learnt their lesson unlike what they did with Neal. Here’s hoping that the “heroes” recognise that Regina has every right to be angry and upset instead of thinking she’s over-reacting. Quote
Well, they don’t have another fanservicy guy that they want Regina to end up with no matter how rushed it would have been.
<p style=”text-align: right;”>
</p>
<p style=”text-align: left;”>If this fandom can be trusted to do one thing it is to start shipping. No matter how irrational, ill-matched, or momentary. I guarantee you the next passably attractive dude Regina is in a scene with and isn’t genetically related to her will probably be incorporated into a new ship.</p>[adrotate group="5"]I’m actually bracing myself for Henry’s death…
His death would further the CS agenda, by getting rid of the last reminder of SF.
Then, Belle would name her baby Henry, making him the third Henry on the show.
I’m scared.
I’m actually bracing myself for Henry’s death…
His death would further the CS agenda, by getting rid of the last reminder of SF.
Then, Belle would name her baby Henry, making him the third Henry on the show.
I’m scared.
That would certainly be unexpected and brave. Question is, would A&E have the balls to actually do it?
All magic comes with a price!
Keeper of FelixIf this fandom can be trusted to do one thing it is to start shipping. No matter how irrational, ill-matched, or momentary. I guarantee you the next passably attractive dude Regina is in a scene with and isn’t genetically related to her will probably be incorporated into a new ship
People are already doing it with Hyde
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"His death would further the CS agenda, by getting rid of the last reminder of SF.
But wouldn’t it also leave Regina utterly alone? I mean, I see what you mean by CS, but Emma’s role in Henry’s life has mostly been secondary to Regina’s. It’s not like Emma is the primary caretaker — pragmatically speaking, Henry shouldn’t be that much of an obstacle to CS, no matter who the baby daddy is.
People are already doing it
#headdesk
On a related but different note — the more I think about Emma’s evolution (involution) this season, the more I think she is becoming similar to… Rumple. At least the Rumple of the last few seasons. Both are single-mindedly obsessed with something to the point of being entirely indifferent to the moral or practical consequences of their actions and pursuits. In Rumple’s case, it’s his loved ones — like Bae and Belle, and now his unborn child — and also, presumably, power. In Emma’s case, it’s CS. To me it almost feels like Emma’s never fully gotten rid of the darkness, which seems to, among other things, ramp up the obsessive, selfish, and “addiction-prone” sides of a character’s personality. From the fact that she was still hearing the dagger, to the way they are doing her make-up, to her utter obsessiveness with Hook, there’s something a little… odd about Emma. And the whole “prophetic” dreams thing. What if it’s not just a MacGuffin? Is it possible that she’s still harboring some sort of DO left-overs?
I’m actually bracing myself for Henry’s death… His death would further the CS agenda, by getting rid of the last reminder of SF. Then, Belle would name her baby Henry, making him the third Henry on the show. I’m scared.
Henry’s death would destroy SF legacy, it will drive Regina further into villain mode and Emma will be broken (because suddenly she will remember she has a son) and Hook will come out good by hugging her or whatever.
"All your questions are pointless"
I see where people are coming from with regards to Henry, but I very much doubt A and E would cross that line. They might think it’s bold, but ABC/ad buyers/Disney would probably cringe at the idea of their “family centered” drama killing off someone under the age of 18.
"He was a lot of things to me" "The only conclusion was love"Did the test even say Emma had to be in True Love? Or did it say she had to have a heart filled with true love?
Because i agree, you could replace Hook with anyone and it would have had the same outcome. And plus with Emma being True Love incarnate, it really doesnr prove anything.
Doea anyone feel like the writers are avoiding an actual TLK?
"I could have the giant duck as my steed!" --Daniel Radcliffe
Keeper Of Tamara's Taser , Jafar's Staff, Kitsis’s Glasses , Ariel’s Tail, Dopey's Hat , Peter Pan’s Shadow, Outfit, & Pied Cloak,Red Queen's Castle, White Rabbit's Power To World Hop, Zelena's BroomStick, & ALL MAGIC
The topic ‘Emma + Baelfire = Swanfire’ is closed to new replies.